REVIEW: My Season of Scandal by Julie Ann Long

Dear Julie Ann Long:
This is the latest (the seventh) installment in the Palace of Rogues series; I believe I’ve read every book except book three, though I started out of order. I began with book four, After Dark with the Duke, which is still by far my favorite in the series.
Anyway, on to My Season of Scandal. Catherine Keating is a young country miss in London for the Season, courtesy of an acquaintance named Lady Wisterberg. There’s not room for Cat at the crowded London townhouse that Lady Wisterberg and her goddaughter are staying at. So Cat is staying at the Grand Palace on the Thames, where the proprietresses will serve as chaperones when she’s not in the care of Lady Wisterberg. Cat is the sensible daughter of a widowed country doctor; at 22, this is likely her only chance to come to London, experience some adventure, and perhaps meet a husband.
Lord Dominic Kirke is also staying at the GPotT; his home is unlivable currently due to his mistress having set it on fire. Dominic is 35 (I side-eye such age differences, especially coupled with life-experience differences, in a way I never used to) and a notorious member of the House of Commons. I’m a tiny bit confused, in retrospect, about him being a lord and being a member of the House of Commons, though to be fair I don’t really know how that all works, and Dominic’s title is definitely not inherited, so perhaps it makes sense.
Cat and Dominic first encounter each other after he visits her room late at night to complain about the noise Cat is making; freshly arrived in London, and unused to her new surroundings and relative freedom, Cat is belting out a naughty song she learned in the GPotT’s drawing room, and dancing around, inadvertently knocking over furniture. The encounter is brief but Kirke makes an impression.
They meet again the next evening, at a ball. Catherine, overwhelmed by the crowds, is hiding among ferns when she overhears an encounter between Kirke and an obnoxious aristocrat, Farquar. That meeting ends with Farquar trying to punch Kirke, and Cat hurries away, only to run into him again minutes later in a secluded location (of course). They engage in banter and she confesses to him that she was made to feel bad about the age of her dress and not having the most in-fashion sleeves. There’s an attraction; hesitant on Cat’s part due to Kirke’s infamy and dangerous air, and somewhat detached on Kirke’s part, because he knows they aren’t suited (I’ll give him a bit of credit there). Still, after they part he does her a service – pays a footman to make sure that Lady Wisterberg, apparently a gambling fiend, leaves on time with Cat in order to get Cat home before the GPotT’s curfew.
The two continue to be thrown together at balls and at the mandatory GPotT’s dinners and evenings spent in the sitting room. There’s a slow-ish build up to admiration and attraction, which I appreciated, and as mentioned above Kirke is pretty sure that it can’t go anywhere, and Cat is probably a bit too dazzled and unworldly to imagine that it could, either. Kirke does go out of his way to do something unusual for him – he dances with Cat publicly at a ball, thus setting her up as the Next Big Thing in the minds of the ton.
Cat is happy with her newfound social success but she is still very drawn to Kirke. Kirke is nursing a secret (though some in the ton know, so I guess it’s not entirely a secret) and eventually he shares it with Cat.
Spoiler: Show
Eventually Cat and Kirke’s relationship progresses to doing naughty things in the garden of balls, which…no, I am just over that at this stage in my life. Maybe once it seemed daring and sexy, now it just seems dumb and I wonder what the h/h think they are doing.
I felt like there was perhaps a bit less time spent at the GPotT than in previous books. I had mixed feelings about that; on the one hand I really like the cozy “found family” conceit of the setting, however twee and unrealistic it may be. On the other hand there is just so much lore and insider information that gets repeated in every book, and it can get tedious.
To borrow a phrase from today’s youth, My Season of Scandal was very mid for me. I think I would have gotten a lot more out of it at another time in my romance reading. It has good writing, a nice, simple plot without a lot of extraneous nonsense, and sympathetic characters. But it’s a plot and characters that, with minor variation, I have seen a thousand times. And that just doesn’t do much for me anymore – maybe it never will again. I just know that when I dip my toes back into historical romance, nine of ten (or more) books just aren’t moving me because they aren’t unusual enough. After Dark with the Duke might actually be the last one that qualifies.
So, my grade for My Season of Scandal is a C+, with the qualification (one I seem to be making almost every time I review historical romance these days) – I think a lot of other historical romance fans might like this more than I did.
Best,
Jennie
The more I look at this cover, the less I like it. She looks like she’s in the throws of … something while he just appears to be (somewhat) smugly mugging for the camera – or painter, I guess.
Many thanks for the review, Jennie. I’ve really enjoyed Long’s prose and storylines in the past.
I’m wondering if it’s just me, but, based on your description of the plot, I can’t help thinking that this is – more or less – a retelling of “After Dark with the Duke”. Is this just my impression? There seem to be so many similarities between the two storylines…
In any case, I’m having a bit of trouble with the 5 years gap between the lead’s *son* and his love interest. Long does the same thing in “After Dark with the Duke”. I just don’t understand the necessity or purpose of this additional drama – especially since it severely increases the “yuck” factor of an already large age gap.
I may give this one a try, only for Long’s prose and rich level of introspection. However, as you wrote, I too very much long for something new…
This is kind of how I feel about “sweet” romances without much conflict. I’m bored of them and have kind of gone off romances lately.
@Jayne: I hadn’t noticed, but you’re right! She’s into it and he’s staring into the distance thinking about how good-looking he is.
@Aoeife: It bugged me less in “After Dark with the Duke” because the heroine there was a bit more street-smart. It’s not necessary for a h/h to have such a large age gap, I agree – maybe it also worked for me there because it was just another way in which the h/h were a study in contrasts. Here…I feel like you can make the heroine a lot younger or a lot more sheltered but doing both just doesn’t work for me these days. I felt differently about it when *I* was younger, but I guess my attitude changed!
@Jennifer: I appreciate a really well done romance without h/h conflict, but it needs to be really well written and characterized. The characterization just wasn’t there for me, here.
@Jennie and @Aoeife: The heroine in After Dark with a Duke was a 26-year-old opera singer, so definitely not naive. Maybe you mean What I Did for a Duke?
I read this a while back and it was totally forgettable but I remember thinking the heroine is milquetoast boring and the hero was interesting only because I see so few politicians as heroes. And I liked the way she wrote him— his sexy voice his oratory skills etc ( I like reading about someone intelligent and whose charisma is from that and not just looks). Having said that it did read very cliche and honestly she’s not doing anything interesting with her series anymore. She remains a solid writer though
@Layla: If I had to pick one, I’d agree that the hero was more interesting than the heroine. But both of them really kind of bored me. I do like politician heroes! Of course they are always on the “right” side, which…I guess I want them to be against child labor and slums, but at the same time it feels a bit trite. Maybe it’s time for a conservative hero that (hopefully) learns the errors of his ways?
@Jennie: My critique partner Meredith Duran’s book A Lady’s Code of Misconduct has a politician hero who learns the error of his political ways (with help from a case of amnesia and from the heroine). I think you read it though.
@Janine:Is that the one where the heroine pretends they’re married when he has amnesia?
@Jennie: Yes!
@Jennie: I just thought of something. One of my favorite politician hero romances is Confessions from an Arranged Marriage by Miranda Neville. And I don’t think you ever read that one. I recommend reading The Dangerous Viscount first though because it sets up Confessions in a big way. The Dangerous Viscount is also pretty fresh (bookworm hero,. fashion plate widowed heroine) though the hero does something pretty awful to the heroine at one point. Not much politics in it though.
@Janine:Thanks for the recs – I can’t even remember if I ever read Neville. I think so? But maybe not.
I think we did review one of her books together and you liked it. The heroine was a widow who liked to throw parties and the hero was a stuffy duke. They actually had a conflict over money spending, not something you see often in romance. I don’t recall the title but it was the first book in her other series, The Wild Quartet.
I found the review! The book was The Importance of Being Wicked.
https://dearauthor.com/book-reviews/overall-b-reviews/b-plus-reviews/review-the-importance-of-being-wicked-by-miranda-neville-3/
@Janine: Thank you! I can’t say I remember it, except maybe vaguely, but rereading the review I can see why I liked it!
@Jennie: I liked that book a lot but some of her others are more memorable. I think Confessions from an Arranged Marriage (the first one I mentioned) might be my favorite but I’m feeling the urge to read the entire Burgundy Club series now.