REVIEW: The Beast Takes a Bride (The Palace of Rogues, #8) by Julie Ann Long

This is book eight in a series – I’ve read all the books except book three (I’ll get to it at some point!) and don’t feel like reading them out of order has caused issues, though the first book obviously establishes the setting, a boardinghouse called The Grand Palace on the Thames.
The proprietresses and denizens of TGPotT (I have felt the need to acronymize the title over the course of reading seven books) are – sometimes exhaustively – introduced and their foibles detailed in each book in the series. I feel like perhaps this series rivals Janet Evanovich’s Stephanie Plum series for dragging out all the secondary characters and the lore associated with them in each and every book. (If it’s not clear, I’m ambivalent at best about this feature, but it does make jumping in at any time easier).
I’ll start with the blurb, because why not:
A blue-blooded beauty bartered to a Beast…
He would pay any price to possess her. But even though Alexandra Bellamy sacrifices herself to save her family’s fortunes, a shocking betrayal sunders her marriage to a taciturn brute of a war hero, Colonel Magnus Brightwall, before it even begins. Five years of icy separation later, a scandal—with Alexandra at the middle—reunites them, and Magnus issues an edict: they will confront the ton, rescue their reputations, then Magnus will banish her to another continent—forever.But alone in a suite at the Grand Palace on the Thames, a new battle begins—between pride and the unexpected volcanic passion stirring between them. The danger is real: Magnus rediscovers why Alexandra is the only woman who could ever break him. And even as she lays bare the beautiful heart beating beneath the battered hide of the near-stranger she married, Alexandra knows she may have already lost him—even as she finally falls fatally, irrevocably in love.
So, the scandal that reunites Alexandra and Magnus is…odd. Alexandra is inadvertently involved in her cousin’s theft of a carriage from a duke and she ends up in Newgate. At first this gave me the impression that Alexandra was living a different, more adventurous life than she actually was. I just wasn’t sure what the point of having Alexandra in Newgate threatened with hanging was. (I mean, the point was to bring Magnus running to save her and kick off their reunion, but it just felt like an unnecessarily dramatic and out-of-place setpiece.)
Anyway, Magnus shows up to get her out and takes her to TGPotT because he is selling her London house out from under her (rude). He then proposes (dictates) the plan detailed in the blurb – they have to go out in society and act normal before they can split forever, because…reasons? This did not make much sense to me either, alas. But it gave the two of them time to get reacquainted, as the story required.
When Alexandra and Magnus met, she was a young woman with looks, charm, and a standard-issue historical romance penurious and feckless father. He was an abandoned orphan turned war hero whose looks were more brutish than romantic. He falls pretty quickly and moves to essentially buy her from her father without much thought as to her feelings on the matter.
Spoiler: Show
Anyway, Magnus storms off to Spain to sulk and do diplomatic things, Alexandra retreats into a quiet life with her family, and that’s where things stand until they meet again at Newgate.
The middle part of the book, where they actually get to know each other while attending balls and doing silly activities with other residents of TGPotT (there is a donkey race at one point), is pleasant, if not groundbreaking. I liked both Magnus and Alexandra and I did understand their conflict; I just didn’t feel that it warranted such a long separation and quite so much sturm und drang. That was pretty much all Magnus’ fault, a fact which also made the story feel a bit unbalanced. (For all that Alexandra does feel some guilt about the reasons for the estrangement.)
In my romance heyday, I LOVED sturm und drang, but even then, I would’ve preferred that the story go deeper, so it felt like there was real hurt and real reasons for that hurt. But I find that today’s historical romances don’t want to take those risks – it’s important somehow that Alexandra being essentially blameless, and that Magnus’ culpability is reduced and explained away (I guess by his bad childhood and not being conventionally handsome, though even that I feel like is me connecting dots that were faint in the story).
I liked The Beast Takes a Bride well enough but it was one of those books that I wanted to be a little different, a little darker. The bones for that were there but it wasn’t the direction that Long chose to go in (and by my recollection she doesn’t really write dark books, generally). My grade for this is a B-.
Best,
Jennie
My grade for this one would be the same as yours, Jennie, or maybe a touch higher. I thought the premise was original — the falling out took place on the wedding day, so the couple were married but didn’t know each other. That aspect was similar to a marriage of convenience book but I’ve never seen that trope crossed with a forgiveness trope before.
I agree Long played it a bit safe by having neither one held as to blame but I actually liked the way the revealing of Magnus’s backstory made me understand and accept his overreaction. I felt though that his plan to send Alexandra away was harsh and that it was a touch contrived that she accepted it as she did.
I was sorry she didn’t have any friends. It may be that Long held back on that because requiring Alexandra to leave a friend / friends behind would have been even harsher of Magnus. But it didn’t ring true to me that she would have no one, given how quickly she befriended the women in prison (in the opening scene), and I really wanted her to have someone in her corner.
The sex scenes had a lot of power, I thought, because her position in the relationship was such a vulnerable one even late in the book.
Did you feel the book had a melancholy tinge, or was it just me? They were two lonely, isolated people who might not have been alone for all these years if this one little thing had not happened or had been understood better.
Nevertheless, for me this was one of the best books in the series thus far. Not stellar but pretty solid and I liked Alexandra much better than the lost lamb heroines in a couple of the other books.
@Janine: I really liked the set up and thought it had a lot of potential, which is part of the reason that I was disappointed by how it played out.
You make a good point about how alone and without friends or any kind of protection Alexandra was. I kind of wondered about how Magnus was just able to sell the house she was living in – I’m sure he had the right to do so but the way it happened felt sort of strange and abrupt.
I often find reunited couple stories melancholy. Even though this wasn’t the longest separation I’ve read of, just knowing that the characters lost that time makes me feel a bit sad.
I agree that it was one of the better books in the series – several of them have been really bland for me, and this at least had a little emotional heft (if not as much as I wanted).
@Jennie: Yes, the sale of the house was abrupt. Did you get the feeling that Magnus was doing that deliberately, as payback? Or that he was just unwilling to put what might be convenient or good for Alexandra on his agenda, even a little? I thought there was a motive for the abruptness there.
I get what you mean and that was a factor here for me. But I think the utter aloneness of both characters (before they found their way to reunion) made it feel more acute in my case.
@Janine: I can see that – he was afraid of falling in the trap of feeling.
I see your point about the aloneness of the h/h and I do have a soft spot for two lonely people coming together. You’re making me rethink my grade a bit – maybe a B/B- rather than a straight B-.
@Jennie: Oh, you are kinder to him than me! I thought it came out of anger. But I think you’re right, the “I don’t want to fall into the trap” was also there.
That was my grade also, B/B-.