REVIEW: 6:40 to Montreal by Eva Jurczyk

No WiFi, no distractions. No way out…
Agatha’s husband has bought her a first-class ticket on the scenic six-hour train from Toronto to Montreal as a gift?a one-day writing retreat so she can get some serious work done on her new book, a highly-anticipated follow-up to Agatha’s runaway bestseller debut novel. The first-class car is the perfect place to be productive, with only a handful of other passengers, plenty of snacks and drinks, and beautiful views flying by outside the window.
But Agatha has other plans for her day out… plans that are unexpectedly derailed when the train breaks down in the middle of the frigid Canadian woods and one of Agatha’s fellow passengers dies quietly in his seat. Soon, a pleasant morning in transit turns into a fight for survival against an unknown and unseen enemy. Will Agatha? or any of the passengers? make it out alive?
I found the above blurb really intriguing – snowbound passengers trapped on a train car and a cheekily named author protagonist – and so I went into this with high hopes. While those high hopes were let down, by what I consider bad plotting, this book did hold my attention and kept me turning the pages.
Agatha has a lot going on – she is a former bank manager who hit it big with her first novel, a mystery featuring a murderous yoga instructor. She’s also a cancer patient whose form of cancer – melanoma – is expected to kill her, sooner or later. This has sent Agatha into a despair that makes connecting with her husband and young son difficult, and working on her follow up novel impossible. For Christmas, her husband has bought her a ticket on the scenic train from Toronto to Montreal; the idea is that she will write on the train (six hours each way), and have a break in the middle to visit an old friend for lunch while she’s in Montreal. Agatha actually has other plans for her time in Montreal, though what those plans are is unclear at first.
The first class car is sparsely populated: an arrogant older businessman who gets on the train ranting into a phone, apparently about his contentious divorce; a mother and her college-age son, returning home for the winter holiday; an older gentleman that Agatha identifies as a “gentle giant.”
Then there’s the conductor, Dorcas, who when we meet her is walking Vivienne, the mother of the mother-son pair, through emergency procedures (I’m not a train traveler but I guess Vivienne is sitting in the equivalent of the airplane emergecy row). Dorcas has a silent trainee with her, one who mysteriously disappears before the train departs.
Then there is Cyanne. Cyanne doesn’t reveal herself until the train has taken off, and Agatha is immediately suspicious that she’s been followed. Cyanne is a former friend and co-worker from earlier in Agatha’s life; their relationship deteriorated long before Agatha’s book came out. But when it did come out, and unexpectedly hit it big, Cyanne emerged from the past, loudly proclaiming that Agatha had clearly based her murderous yoga instructor on her, Cyanne, a presumably not-murderous yoga instructor. She’s been a thorn in Agatha’s side ever since, and now Agatha’s trapped on a train with her.
Agatha is seated next to Finch, the ferociously unlikable businessman, and ends up giving up her seat and moving across the aisle, since 1) Finch apparently covets her seat 2) she doesn’t want to sit next to him and 3) the train car, with only six passengers and one conductor, clearly is roomy enough for everyone to spread out as they wish. There are events that make the seat switch more important to the plot than it would otherwise be, though.
Things start to go wrong when the train abruptly stops on a snowy, desolate stretch of wilderness with no wifi or chance of going for help. Dorcas reassures the passengers that the train will start again momentarily, but that claim is tested as the hours begin to stretch out. Eventually it is discovered that one of the passengers has died, and then, a bit later, it becomes clear that the death was not natural. Add in a medical emergency for another passenger and the increasing hostility Cyanne directs at Agatha, and things devolve quickly.
I thought the writing and characterization in 6:40 to Montreal were both well done. Early on, Agatha isn’t quite likable – she’s a little too cynical and angry (with reason, to be sure!) for that. But she’s an engaging and mostly smart protagonist. The other folks on the train car are brought to life through Agatha’s incisive author’s eye. Cyanne is particularly entertaining – she’s amusing in her single-minded anger towards Agatha (which, it turns out, is more justified than it first seems) and it takes a while to realize that she is not bright nor emotionally mature. Vivienne is particularly sympathetic as an overprotective mother who really starts to lose it when her son’s wellbeing is threatened.
The good parts of the book make it all the more disappointing that the plotting was beyond-acceptably-absurd. When I’m really engrossed in a story I can accept a LOT of absurdity, but this wasn’t quite THAT good, and the absurdity was really, really absurd.
Start with a murder committed in such an inefficient and chancy way (a murder in which Agatha improbably immediately identifies the murder weapon, in a way that’s never explained). Much later on when Agatha figures everything out, one realizes that the killer was standing in plain sight early on and Agatha could have identified them at any time. This is the type of thing that happens sometimes in suspense that really takes me out of the story – like I guess there is supposed to be tension in the possibility of discovery (though in this case the tension is non-existent since you don’t find out about the killer’s presence until much later). I can accept some fantastic elements in suspense but I still like people to act like…people, more or less. In this case, the killer’s choices made no sense to me.
I was also confused about how isolated the people in the railway car were from the other cars, where presumably there are people who could help when things start to go south. Dorcas tells everyone that the doors lock automatically in a power outage, which….say it with me…made no sense. Why would that be feature of the train security? What if there were a fire?
It never seems to occur to the group to try to get off the train to get the attention of people in other cars from the outside, if they can’t move through the cars. There is a raging blizzard, of course, but that doesn’t stop them from eventually leaving the train – it’s just that they do that thinking they will “go for help” – even though they know there are no houses or other buildings nearby. Still not considering the other passengers who are right there.
By the end, it’s quite clear that Agatha is not a good person. I didn’t mind her being cynical and angry, but her attitude toward another character’s death was chilling and just a bit too dark for me.
The motivation of the killer remained unclear to me. I am not sure if it was meant to be unclear? There were aspects of the story where it was hard to tell if it was just bad plotting or something intentional that I didn’t understand.
This is another “hard to grade” book because in spite of what I saw as big flaws, it was entertaining enough to read (this is kind of the story of my life with suspense novels). I think it’s a B- for me.
Best,
Jennie
I had thought about requesting this arc as the blurb sounded intriguing but I kept reading too many reviews which mentioned a whackadoodle ending and lots of repetition.
@Jayne: It’s too bad because it had good bones, I thought.
Please fix the author’s last name in the title so people can more easily find this review if they’re looking for it. Thanks.
@EmmeG: Done and thanks for pointing it out.
I’m curious (because the main character is an author named Agatha) if this is an homage to Murder on the Orient Express or another of Agatha Christie’s mysteries. Do you know?
@Janine: I’ve never read Murder on the Orient Express, so I can’t say for sure. i assumed “Agatha” and the train setting was at least a nod to it.
I want to read MotOE at some point; I am, however, semi-spoiled on the plot twist. That doesn’t happen in this book, FWIW.
Titillated by the title & the cover synopsis, and took it on my beach vacation with HIGH hopes. VERY let down & VERY surprised B&N chose it as their November pic.
Though there were a few instances where the writer truly captured the tension & suspense felt by the passengers trapped in the train, she was NEVER able to capitalize on those moments. They were fleeting & never swept the reader away. In fact, after a while the story became tedious, trite & redundant. Would not recommend.
Titillated by the title & the cover synopsis, and took it on my beach vacation with HIGH hopes. VERY let down & VERY surprised B&N chose it as their November pic.
Though there were a few instances where the writer truly captured the tension & suspense felt by the passengers trapped in the train, she was NEVER able to capitalize on those moments. They were fleeting & never swept the reader away. In fact, after a while the story became tedious, trite & redundant. Would not recommend.
@Patricia: @Patricia: I think I liked it a *bit* more than you did but I sympathize with your judgments. It was disappointing given that it had some momentum.
Very improbable. No plausible characters. No reasonable responses to the dilemmas on the train. Waste of time reading it and trying to figure it out.
I couldn’t put this book down until I finished it. Then I asked myself what I had just read.
I purchased the book in Montreal after burning through the book I had brought with me on the train (to Montreal). The reviews seemed interesting and the setting was fitting, so I grabbed it at Indigo Montreal Eaton’s Centre and immersed myself completely en route to Quebec City for NYE.
With my motive and the setting clearly established, let me explain how things went down: it’s a faced-paced read and I was deeply enthralled, comparing some of the characters to those around me. I was able to dismiss some basic issues that any train-traveller would notice. For example, on train staff are “service attendants” not “customer service agents.” And there are no conductors anymore, managers are called “Train Managers” or “service Managers.” I feel like basic research would have explained this, but perhaps the author was leaning into a broader audience by using generic titles.
As I read further, I found certain things to be bothersome. The main character, Agatha, was so completely unlikable, regardless of her circumstance. Her nemesis, Cyanne, was self-absorbed to the point it no longer made sense. No human being in those situations would react the way she did. I liked Vivien and her son, but like others said – it became way too repetitive and borderline ignorant. I refuse to believe that it took 11 hours to figure out an alternate exit strategy, and you really have to suspend your belief that VIA locks its doors between train cars during an emergency. Quite the opposite, they remain open so passengers can move away from danger. Also, the staff phone and intercoms are tied to battery backup so they would not go out in case of a power failure. I could go on forever, you know you can see through those windows, right? Like if someone on the other side was to use the bathroom at ANY point in 11 hours, they would have been able to potentially flag down help.
I found myself picking these annoying tidbits apart as the book went on and needed something redeeming. Trust me, the ridiculous ‘murder weapon’ was not it. And why a character would choose to mutilate himself while on board is another head-scratcher. Agatha became intolerable towards the end. I really wanted to be as shocked as others were as to who the culprit was, but I figured that out during the “black widow” conversation. The motive however, was insane and there should have been some major jail time involved. The fact that everything played out perfectly (who knew Kingston police were so dumb?) was like gift wrapping a pair of stinky socks.
And the final nail in the coffin was the last chapter. Can you say ewww?! The things that turn people on; I will take Sociopath for 200, Alex. Trying to make sex sound good in books makes me want to vomit to begin with, but this added a new layer of gross.
All in all, I will be giving it a 3.5 rounded to 4 because of sweet Dorcas and the fact that I ended up being stuck on VIA for 21 hours that day.