Tuesday News: Amazon’s retail vision, Nielsen Survey results, gaming the Hugo Awards, and #VeryRealisticYA
We May Have Just Uncovered Amazon’s Vision for a New Kind of Retail Store – So Amazon is apparently still thinking about a move into retail spaces, with the added bonus that customers won’t have to engage in any kind of traditional checking out process. The convenience and likely efficiency sound appealing, but the potential privacy breaches with cameras and other scanning technology doesn’t sound so swell to me.
A recently filed patent application by Amazon reveals details about a new kind of retail establishment that would allow shoppers to pick items and leave without stopping at a cashier station or kiosk.
Based around the idea of complete convenience, such a store would work using a system of cameras, sensors or RFID readers that would be able to identify shoppers and the items they’ve chosen, according to the application, which was filed in September and published in January. The technology would also potentially give Amazon a more cost-effective way to compete with traditional retailers by operating a store that doesn’t require cashiers and could similarly serve as a place to pick up online orders. –Re/code
E-books Gained, Online Retailers Slipped in 2014 – So the new Nielsen Survey results have dropped, and they’re pretty interesting. Both print and digital seem to be winning and losing, and, as widely anticipated, dedicated e-reading devices are on the decline, both Kindle and Nook. Android phones experienced a huge jump, though, from 9 to 33%, even though iPhones still dominate.
E-books accounted for 15% of the spending on all new books (backlist and frontlist titles) last year, up from 12% in 2013. The format’s share of units rose at a slightly slower rate, rising by one percentage point in the year, to 21%, an indication that though e-books remain lower priced than print titles, prices have increased. Print accounted for 70% of new-book spending in 2014, a drop of seven percentage points from 2013. The print declines came in trade paperback and hardcover, while mass market paperbacks had a slight increase in their share of spending. Consumers still spent the most money on hardcovers in 2014, with the format accounting for 32% of spending in the year, followed by trade paperback. Trade paperbacks accounted for the most units sold, though their share fell from 30% in 2013 to 27% last year; hardcovers held a 26% share of units in 2014, down from 27%. The audiobook category, led by digital downloadable works, had a solid year with its share of spending rising to 3% in 2014 from 1%. –Publishers Weekly
Yes, the Sad Puppies campaign swept the Hugo Awards – For those of you who are not too familiar with the inner workings of the Hugo Award (like me), it seems that a particular slate of nominees is going to sweep the award, namely the “Sad Puppies,” which are described by Brad Torgersen (via donotlink) as
entirely deserving works, writers, and editors — all of whom would not otherwise find themselves on the Hugo ballot without some extra oomph received from beyond the rarefied, insular halls of 21st century Worldcon “fandom.”
According to Jason Sanford, this is not going over well with the Worldcon folks, who are already looking at future rule changes. But in the meantime, the legitimacy, purpose, and meaning of the awards all appear to be in flux.
While the fact that the Hugo Awards can be gamed may shock some people, it’s actually somewhat easy to do in the categories with lower voter participation, such as the short fiction categories. For example, if a few dozen people organize to vote for the same short story they can land that story on the final ballot. The reason this hasn’t been a major issue before is no one organized a large enough voting campaign like Sad Puppies 3. Basically, people had too much respect for the Hugo Awards to try and land only particular stories on the final ballot for political reasons. Most Hugo voters also took their nominating ability serious and voted for what they considered to be the best stories — and not for certain slates of stories and authors merely to make a larger cultural point. –Jason Sanford
The Plot of YA Novels If They Actually Reflected Real Teenagers’ Lives – On the origins of the #VeryRealisticYA hashtag and some of the more stellar tweets.
While many are fighting against this lack of representation, teen author John Hansen — who identifies as a feminist, queer and an ally — is addressing the representation of teenage life in a clever new Twitter hashtag, #VeryRealisticYA.
The conversation began with Hansen’s observation that, despite being geared towards young adults, this genre generally doesn’t reflect the reality of being a teenager. Hansen’s observations quickly evolved into #VeryRealisticYA — a widespread exploration of the many sexist, heterosexist and overall problematic social norms young adult fiction often perpetuates. –Identities.Mic
Wow, I sure don’t like the idea of being physically stalked by any store I go into. I don’t like them keeping my credit card on file, and I don’t like them tracking who comes into their store. If companies start tracking us physically like they do when we search things out online, I might start wearing a burka when I’m out in public. With anti-RFID lining.
The act of having to physically check out causes me to think about my purchases, and cuts down on impulse buys. Making impulse purchases easier is in the store’s best interest, but it’s sure not in the customer’s. Especially if you don’t even see the price tally until you look at your credit card statement. Ugh. Blech. Do not like.
@Wahoo Suze: Agreed! This whole idea gives me the creeps.
The Amazon thing means that you’d have to sign in, in some way. I think a barrier to entry would be far more off-putting than a line before you exit.
Further, how are they going to make sure that someone closely following you doesn’t get their purchases scanned on your credit card? In a pre-Christmas rush, with crowds coming in and out of the store, it’s quite possible for someone’s books to be closer to another person’s purse than her own.