REVIEW: Raising the Rent by J.L. Merrow
Dear J.L. Merrow:
It doesn’t bode well for a review when you get to the end of a story and exclaim, “that’s it?” This was originally published as a short story in an anthology called Sindustry, and I can’t help thinking that it might as well have stayed there. It’s likable enough, but even though supposedly expanded from the original story, there just wasn’t enough there to make a strong novella.
Nathan is looking forward to starting classes at the local college, working his way up to a university, and then waving his degree in the face of his stepfather, “who’d always told him he was as thick as pig shit and only good for one thing.” But in the meantime, he’s making the rent — almost — on the streets. Thank goodness for the regular he’d nicknamed Tall, Dark and Ugly — a nickname that makes him uncomfortable now, since he’s been starting to notice TD&U’s gorgeous blue eyes and compactly muscled thighs.
What happens on Nathan’s first day of classes is a considerable shock:
This… this wasn’t supposed to happen. College was his second chance. His fresh start. What he did on the streets to survive, that wasn’t supposed to even get in the door. Let alone stand up in front of the class in a posh sweater and start teaching him poetry.
But having his regular client turn out to be his English teacher is only the start of Nathan’s bad luck. When he’s badly beaten and winds up homeless, the man he now knows as Stephen offers him succor. It’s completely free of sexual obligation… which Nathan discovers he has mixed feelings about.
There’s an art to writing romance from only one point of view, and it’s nicely done here. Though one or two of Stephen’s reactions were inexplicable to me, for the most part it’s easy to see that he’s developing some complicated feelings for his “rent boy,” just as Nathan is developing some for him. Both characters are sympathetic, and the sheer awkwardness of their situation brings a sweetness to their relationship.
Part of why I didn’t love this is that I’m not fond of the downtrodden-rescuer dynamic, and that’s pretty much the whole story. Even with Stephen doing his level best not to pressure Nathan in any way, the power between them is heavily weighted on his side: Stephen is maybe twice Nathan’s age, he’s an intellectual and Nathan’s teacher, he’s a former client, he’s from a higher social class, and he’s comfortably off while Nathan has nothing. When Stephen asks for a sex act that Nathan doesn’t enjoy, Nathan naturally goes into accommodating mode:
‘Stephen? I want to, all right?’ It wasn’t much of a lie.
To be clear, I don’t think Nathan is agreeing because he feels obligated, but because he cares about Stephen and wants to please him. (And of course, this being a romance, he’s totally into it by the time it happens.) Still, that large a power imbalance complicates a relationship, and it’s not truly addressed — other than in writing Stephen as such a noble character — although Nathan does improve his circumstances somewhat. For me, it was an uncomfortable Cinderella story.
But mainly, I felt like I spent the entire book waiting for things to happen. I waited for Stephen to seem more like a real person and less like a stereotype of an erudite, prim professor. I waited for Nathan’s intellectual interests to really seem like part of his character. I waited for the plot and characters to feel less derivative of other, better, Merrow novellas. Mainly, I waited for Nathan’s original nickname for Stephen to come back and bite him on the ass — as a romance reader, it really seemed like a Chekov’s gun, to me!
I did appreciate a twist on what’s becoming a very annoying conversation in romance:
‘Um, I’ve never done drugs — and I’ve never shagged without a condom, or, you know, done anything else without one, so if you didn’t want to use one…’
Stephen leant over and kissed him. ‘I’m relieved to hear it. But I think now is not the time to get into bad habits.’
Way not to be an idiot, Stephen!
I read the book twice to be sure I was being fair to it, and I’m sticking with my grade of C.
Thanks for the review. JL Merrow is so hit or miss for me. I was already planning to pass on this one – as a former professor, professor / student romances don’t usually work for me at all. I can see the appeal of the fantasy (and I know a couple of people who made it work irl – as one friend says, marrying my professor is less scandalous now that we’ve been married 30 years) but it still icks me out.
@cleo: After a great honeymoon period of “omg, everything this writer does is awesome!” I’ve reluctantly come to the conclusion that she’s hit or miss for me too. :-(
Totally agree with your review. It was so disappointing. The nickname was a gun that didn’t go off, and there was another one (I thought) with the introduction of something valuable that seemed destined to give rise to a big misunderstanding of theft somewhere along the way. I was sort of relieved that neither happened because they seemed so obviously telegraphed, but it made the whole thing feel a little sloppy. It seemed less like undermining reader expectations and more like just letting threads drop, or weighting what turned out to be unimportant details too heavily. I also thought Stephen’s speech patterns were ridiculous. I got what the author was going for, but he didn’t sound like any human being I’ve ever heard speak. It wasn’t the word choice, it was the rhythms that just felt painfully off to me. I tried to give it a pass as British hyper-erudition as opposed to American hyper-erudition but it really did not work for me. (And I love pretentious people who speak precisely and with a love of uncommon words in books AND real life!)
I read the original short story in the Dreamspinner anthology. I think the new version is updated and a little longer. The original stood out in a collection of short stories to the point that I was actually able to remember that I read it all this time later. Maybe the author went wrong this time by trying to expand what was meant to be a short story into something that could stand alone.
@Willaful – I had a similar honeymoon period. I loved the first two Merrows that I read so, so much – it took me awhile to realize that none of her other stories have worked as well for me. I’ll keep reading her, but she’s not an auto buy.
Now I want to know what sex act Stephen asked for because yes, I am that shallow.
@Kaetrin: Nothing that exciting, just anal. (How jaded we are!)
@Willaful: LOL is that all? I was hoping for something exotic!! (so jaded)
This review intrigued me and I did love Merrow’s other books so I checked this out. I actually enjoyed it – it’s not as good as PRICKS AND PRAGMATISM and it does feel a bit derivative of that, but it was an undemanding fun short read. I wasn’t actually as bothered by the power divide and the age difference as I thought I would be – mostly because it was from Nathan’s point of view and he clearly had agency. On the other hand, unlike P&P, it felt quite slight and more or a HFN type of story, which is fine.
LOL! I’ve met people who speak like Stephen – they do exist: that special breed of English posh boy academics who, happily for the rest of us, generally tend not to venture out of their ivory towers. Just be glad that Stephen doesn’t sprinkle his conversation with Latin/Greek aphorisms… However, I can’t imagine any of them being able to do anything as useful/stressful as teach 6th form college in the real world.