Review: The Empty Throne by Megan Derr

The Kingdom of Cremisio is in turmoil—the royal family dead by assassination, a secret heir no one can find, and three enemy kingdoms fighting bitterly to each take control of Cremisio for themselves. If the missing heir cannot be identified and located, Cremisio will fall once and for all, and thousands of people will die with it. Only one person knows the identity of the missing Lord Cohea Szelis, the Duke of Lindquist, also known as the Fox of Cremisio. Notoriously honorable, impossible to break, leaving those who have captured him frustrated and helpless. Until one of his captors notices the ring he wears, a ring that marks him Bound, an old, illegal spell that binds two people together, body and soul. If one dies, so does the other. If they can locate the person Cohea loves enough to Bind himself to, they might finally get the Fox to break…The task of finding that Bonded falls to Jethue Bittersea, notorious exiled traitor to the throne, and an assassin who has never failed. It will also give him a chance to do some hunting of his own for this mysterious heir who is the key to everything…
Review:
Dear Megan Derr,
I have read many of your books by now. The description for this one sounded like one of your themes I enjoy the most – politics, fights and love stories (often but not always exploring from friends to enemies tropes) mixed up with suspense and adventure. In many ways this is exactly what this book ended up to be and I liked that but I also wanted to give sort of a warning. It is not exactly a warning – I am sure many readers will enjoy this part of the plot and characterization more than I did – but I still need to share: Jethue Bittersea one of the main characters in the story is an assassin as the blurb tells you.
I don’t often pick up a story featuring an assassin no matter how non graphic the descriptions of his killings are, however at times here we have graphic descriptions of blood spilled and some torture involved as well. In fact the book begins with some torture too (not done by Lord Bittersea but torture nevertheless). The violence and torture are not done *just because*. It is very much a necessary part of the story and Bittersea does have his own moral code but I won’t deny that at times his *enjoyment* of killings was too much for me as a reader no matter how much a lot of people he did in deserved it.
Mind you I didn’t blink an eye at the killings that characters including Lord Bittersea engaged in during the war when they have to protect their home and their king. Although Lord Bittersea’s motivations even at that time included some enjoyment I have to say. I’m going to sound contradictory and say that he is a fascinating character. Some book assassins are actually way too noble and fluffy bunnies deep inside. The book actually seems to acknowledge that he has serial killer tendencies no matter if he often does kill bad people but he certainly didn’t shy away from killing for hire in more grey circumstances.
And even the person who loves him seems to acknowledge that Bittersea won’t ever love him the way he does and he is okay with it. Bittersea may change a lot for one person whom he fell in love with it but his love of killing doesn’t go away and he seems to decide to exercise it *solely* on horrible people only now. I thought the characterization here was fascinating.
Also Bittersea and his love were very hot together I thought – obviously opinions differ.
There are two more love stories developing along with this one. I think I liked them all.
I also very much appreciated how the story here sent a message – this is actually the kind of message I love in the fictional books. I said the war finally breaks in the last third (I think ?) of the book and one paragraph, one paragraph of the musings that one of the characters engaged in suddenly made me think that the author may have wanted to show her disgust over the war in Ukraine.
“Cohea looked at him, at Oskia, in silent conversation. It was stupid. It was pointless. Cremisio was a small kingdom that bothered nobody, and all they’d ever asked in return was the same courtesy. They didn’t restrict travel, they didn’t levy heavy tariffs, they didn’t do anything to impede their neighbors from working with each other. They’d more than compensated everyone over the years for the damage caused by the dead sea.So many people dead, so many families ruined, because Terek and their—cronies weren’t content with the power they already had. The citizens of three whole countries would be suffering now, from the deaths caused, the property destroyed, the livelihoods lost… for what?”
I have not been in author’s head. I have no idea if this was what she had in mind, but because this is something that had been on my mind that paragraph invoked these thoughts in my head. Maybe somebody else will read that passage and think about other terrible wars where a big aggressive state decided to attack a small neighbor who did not attack anyone first. I don’t know but I liked how it was done. I think I like when the message can be more universal I guess and invoke different thoughts from different readers and still be clear enough.
B+
This sounds interesting — I’ll see if my library has a copy.
I like assassin books when the assassin is written well, in shades of gray, but at the same time with a kernel of humanity.
Oh, Megan Derr. I love her plots, I love her characters, I love her world building, I love her dark DARK themes.
I do not love how terribly edited her books often are. Please tell me that this one is the exception, because it sounds like my jam.
@hapax: so I basically stopped mentioning the editing part in my reviews for two reasons : in the past when even I was picking up on some editing issues it meant that I likely missed a lot and I felt comfortable mentioning it because native speakers would find more editing issues . Now I notice very few ( that does not mean that there aren’t any mind you ) so I feel like that I can’t call it terrible . If that helps a buddy read one of her recent books and she is a native English speaker and she didn’t notice anything particularly horrible . Sorry I can’t help more .
And thank you for commenting have not seen your comments in a long time :)
Janine I will be super curious when you finally read one of her books .
@Sirius: I really want to. She has a TON of her books and I don’t know where to start! Maybe you and Hapax can help? Which series should I start with (hopefully one that’s good and doesn’t have as many editing issues)?
The Lost Gods
Tales of the High Court
Dance with the Devil
KRIA
Legacy of Charlet
The Infinitum Government
Four Families
Misfit Wick
Black Magic
Unbreakable Soldiers
The Neighborhood
Seven Brothers
No Man’s Land
Natures in Harmony
Anti-Heroes
Legendary Hearts
Heart of Fire
Tales of Tavamara
Princes of the Blood
Menagerie
Legends of the Masked
Trice City Lovers
Lost Shifters
Lifesworn
Deceived
Jewel Bonds
Paranormal Days
And here are some that seem to be standalones:
Ink & Paper
Fairytales Slashed
Locke & Key
Mismatch, Lovematch
Demonica
Wriggle & Sparkle
I’m probably leaving some out. Few authors are this prolific. It took a long time just to type these out, I can’t read that many blurbs. And no wonder the copy errors, if she writes her books fast.
If you and Hapax (and anyone else reading this) could each recommend me your top three or so, or something you think would be my thing, that would be really helpful.
@Janine: Oh yes she has tons of stuff, and normally it would make me suspicious, but a lot of her stuff is REALLY good IMO ( again editing notwithstanding unfortunately especially in the earlier works).
I mean just do not start with her shorts. I liked several of those too, but she does not go in much depth with those and in a lot of her longer stuff she does.
I think it may very well be your thing, I think just as I do you like well done enemies to lovers and it used to be a very prevalent trope in her books. And she plays with a lot of fantasy beings/ creatures, does all kinds of characters, she now writes more m/f too than before although m/m is still prevalent too. I really like how matter of fact she writes trans characters as well ( they just are, if that makes sense).
My first long work of hers was Prisoner which I really loved ( I think it is now KRIA duology, but I liked second book less if I remember correctly). But again that is her early work, so think of editing issues at your own risk.
I loved Unreakable soldiers series, loved the first two books of Tales of the High Court, I think Deceived is now a collection of shorter novellas, which may have been my first work of hers that I have read, period.
The last two books that i reviewed here including this one I definitely can recommend.
I mean I am a fan, I loved way more of her works than I did not you know?
Several of these that you mentioned feature zombies and vampires though and these I tend to skip, but it may be to your liking too.
Thanks, Sirius. Do you recall around what time you stopped noticing so many copy errors in her books? I want to start with one of the books where that wasn’t that noticeable.
Also, between this one and Hammer & Powder, which do you like most?
@Janine: No I do not, sorry. I do recall stopping once in Hammer and Powder and that was it, but again unfortunately that does not mean much.@Janine: I think I would recommend this one for you as this one was an edgier story I thought, but I loved Hammer and Powder too. Also, someone to whom I recommended Hammer and Powder pointed to me that while the characters and all the build up was wonderful, she felt that a quite significant storyline ended with a whimper rather than with a punch. I am not sure if I am hundred percent in agreement, but I can see my friend’s POV.
@Sirius: I just went and read some amazon reviews. Unfortunately, there is at least one three star review that once again says good story bad editing, so again proceed at your own caution. I was too engrossed to notice much, but I am sure you will notice it.
@Sirius: Was that about this book, or Hammer & Powder?
This one
@Sirius: Thanks.