REVIEW: The Sins of Lord Lockwood by Meredith Duran
Dear Meredith Duran:
When I realized that The Sins of Lord Lockwood, book six in the Rules for the Reckless series, was coming out soon, I was excited. Not only were the glimpses of the hero in previous books intriguing, but the blurb indicated that this was a “hero returned from the dead after (apparently) deserting the heroine on their wedding night” story. (Only in romance could *that* be considered a subgenre.) It’s a trope that I’ve enjoyed before, as it tends to play with the characters’ assumptions about who exactly is the injured party in an estrangement (in this version, the heroine thinks she’s been wronged but hasn’t; the gender-switch corollary I’ve liked in the past is “couple is estranged because the hero thinks the heroine cheated but she didn’t” which I enjoy even more because I’m shamefully drawn to mistreated heroines).
Anyway, our story: Liam Devaliant, Lord Lockwood, is kidnapped on his wedding night and thrown on a transport ship to Australia. Predictably, no one onboard believes that he’s not a lowly convict, but an actual British lord. His new wife, Anna, assumes he’s run off now that he has her money; they quarreled before he stormed off to get kidnapped (I don’t think it’s ever explained how his assailants knew he’d be where he was when they abducted him, but whatever). She retreats to her remote Scottish island and tries to move on.
Four years later, Liam is back in London, looking for revenge. There’s never any doubt (at least not in this book; it’s addressed in previous books, if I recall correctly) about who had him kidnapped, or why: his cousin Stephen had long coveted Liam’s title. Liam is living in his London townhouse, with a Lost Boys-style staff of fellow Australian convicts, toying with Stephen (his plan is to run him into the ground financially, essentially ruining his life, then kill him). Liam’s actually doing just that, toying with Stephen, at a party (full of disreputable types) he’s holding in his lavish London townhouse, right before Anna shows up unexpectedly on Liam’s doorstep.
Liam has been avoiding Anna since his return from the dead. His reasons are complicated, though of course she thinks they’re quite simple: he’s back in England, spending her money outfitting his townhouse luxuriously, and holding debauched entertainments like the one she walks in on the night she comes back into Liam’s life. She decides, for her own reasons, to move in with him; Liam is not pleased.
The Sins of Lord Lockwood is not told in an entirely linear fashion – it eventually skips back to Liam and Anna’s first meeting, and then intersperses scenes from their unconventional courtship and eventual wedding with the present day storyline. I know some readers don’t like this style, but it works for me. Particularly in a story like this, where many of Liam and Anna’s present day encounters are tense, dark and fraught with conflict, it’s a relief to occasionally revert to simpler, happier days.
Anna’s upbringing is unconventional and somewhat lonely. Her mother dies when she is young, and after that her father foists her off on a variety of aunts, before settling her on Rawsey, her beloved island, with her grandmother. She’s a heiress but needs a husband to come into her inheritance – her main concern always being the island and the well-being of its inhabitants. Anna’s a little bit of a “type” – red-headed Scot, feisty and independent, and a bluestocking to boot. She doesn’t expect to marry for love, and her engagement to Liam is a matter of convenience for both of them. But she’s attracted to him and as she gets to know him she views Liam as someone who has enough respect for women (and for Anna specifically) not to interfere with her business dealings.
Young Liam is handsome and happy-go-lucky. He is reputed to be a bit of a rogue (he’s rumored to have been sent down from Oxford for setting a fire in the Bodleian Library), but his reputation is exaggerated. He needs to marry for money in order to counteract his late father’s poor financial decisions. When he meets and is attracted to Anna, he decides to pursue her, first for practical reasons (though he likes her from the beginning and finds her fascinating – he likes that she’s not impressed by him). In the period between their initial meeting and their wedding day, Liam finds himself drawn even more to Anna, and by their wedding day he’s practically ready to declare his feelings. But the moment passes, and when they quarrel after their wedding (about money, brought on by insecurities on both sides) he storms away and doesn’t see Anna again for four years.
In some ways, this could be considered a Big Mis story, but the reality is a lot more complex. Anna is under the misapprehension that Liam checks every box on the Dissolute British Lord Checklist: money-grubbing, feckless, philandering, check, check, check. None of those things are true but Liam is so damaged by his transportation and the abuse he suffered in Australia that he feels incapable of being the man Anna once married. Further, he is angry at *her*, feeling that she should have looked for him, raised a hue and cry over his mysterious disappearance, rather than simply believing he’d left her and going on with her life. The conflict is especially poignant because he’s not wrong, but on the other hand Anna’s position is understandable as well – she didn’t want to be seen as a fool chasing after a husband that she genuinely believed deserted her.
The writing in The Sins of Lord Lockwood is excellent, as one would expect of this author. But what really makes the story is the complexity of the conflict and the characterization; both Anna and Liam are so sympathetic but there is no easy path to resolution for them – time and a rebuilding of trust is needed.
I had a minor quibble with the hero’s behavior near the end, when he makes a choice not to be forthright with the heroine, seemingly just for the plot contrivance of having her run after him. But the denouement was otherwise very smartly done, so I can’t complain too much.
My grade for The Sins of Lord Lockwood is an A-.
Best,
Jennie
I loved this book. Not knowing each other very well before the marriage (despite their powerful attraction) made it all the easier for both of them to believe the worst of each other. On Anna’s part there was also the ‘what else is new, I’ve been abandoned’ feeling that was familiar to her due to her father’s pawing her off to relatives constantly.
And yes, Anna is a bit ‘type’ but I was glad to be reading about a Scottish lady for a change!!
Triple bonus points for ‘seeing’ Julian and Emma from The Duke of Shadows again.
If I had to pick a favorite Duran that would be it. Glad I don’t have to, though. She’s the best IMO.
Thanks for this review, Jennie!
This sounds very promising. Would it be preferable to read the first five books in the series before reading this one or is it enough of a standalone that I can get away with it?
I thought the author did a good job of contrasting the Liam pre & post-kidnapping. Young Liam was such a nice person and the author does a good job in writing about the trauma he experienced. The PTSD scenes are especially effective.
The review states who the villain is, but I don’t think the earlier books alluded to it, so this might be a slight spoiler. I know the identity isn’t given in The Duke of Shadows & I don’t think it was answered in A Lady’s Code of Misconduct.
I have a question: How did Liam’s cousin know the exact details of Liam’s experience? Someone would have to have been at Elland to know the information and I doubt any of Liam’s fellow prisoners would have betrayed him. I also didn’t get the feeling that the kidnappers gave updates to the people who paid for the kidnappings.
I noticed one other thing. What was a throwaway line by Liam in TDoS (“This is my sis -“) didn’t make sense in this book. Liam had no reason to introduce Anna as his sister, but the author wrote that line before she knew there would be a sequel.
@Little Red: Although it’s a stand-alone book, it’s good idea to read The Duke of Shadows & A Lady’s Code of Misconduct. The former book describes two secondary characters from Liam’s story and the latter book explains the background on the kidnapping plot.
@Kim I think it’s plausible that the villain would request to know a bit of what transpired at Elland if he wanted to be satisfied Liam was well on his way to dying? But I understand how this could come across as a small plot hole. It didn’t jump at me — you have keener eyes.
As for the sister line… Yes, it is true MD had no clue when she wrote DoS 10 years ago that later on she’d write a book about Liam so that line doesn’t make much sense now, unless we, knowing there is a Lockwood story, wanted to view it as one more repudiation on Liam’s part of Anna’s return and effort toward their marriage.
@Claudia:
These are excellent points – the best conflict always arises organically from the characters’ flaws and weaknesses.
@Little Red: I’m not a purist about reading in order so I think this would be fine as a stand-alone.
@Kim: The review states who the villain is, but I don’t think the earlier books alluded to it, so this might be a slight spoiler. I know the identity isn’t given in The Duke of Shadows & I don’t think it was answered in A Lady’s Code of Misconduct.
Interesting – I really didn’t remember the details from previous books that well; I mostly remember the weird guy and his trick room of mirrors and traps. FWIW, he’s revealed very early in this book.
The plot hole I keep coming back to is Liam’s abduction, which presumably wouldn’t have happened if he and Anna hadn’t fought and he hadn’t stormed away. I feel like I’m missing something (I might be, again, from previous books; I have a terrible memory these days).
@Claudia Thanks for the input. I guess the reader has to assume some things. :)
@Jennie I wondered about that, too. The cousin instigated the argument between Liam & Anna, but he had no way of knowing Liam would storm out of the cabin. It was definitely a plot hole.
I just presumed Liam was being followed and would-be captors told ‘whenever he’s alone, nab ‘im.’
The cousin instigated the argument to poison the marriage and make it less likely Anna would raise the alarm whenever the abduction occurred… which is exactly what happens, she just presumes he abandoned her after gaining access to her money. There were no love declarations, despite Liam’s almost spilling the beans before the ceremony, making it all the easier for her to believe he just sauntered off.
It turns out that I have the second book , “Fool Me Twice”, in the series already and just finished reading it. I’ll keep this one in mind as well.
For those of you who are concerned about ‘series order’–Duran’s publishers have done her a disservice.
Duke of Shadows, A Lady’s Code of Misconduct and The Sins of Lord Lockwood all tie together and take place in 1857-1861 or so.
The first four books in ‘Rules for the Reckless’ do tie together and take place in the 1880s. The main character in #1 “That Scandalous Summer’ was a minor character in Duran’s earlier books “Bound by You Touch’ and ‘Written on Your Skin’, in case you are interested.