JOINT REVIEW: Spinning Silver by Naomi Novik
I believe this is our first four-person review here at DA. Sirius, Jennie, Jayne and myself review Naomi Novik’s Spinning Silver with reactions that run the gamut from “Loved it!” to “Couldn’t finish it.” We hope you’ll enjoy our review. –Janine
Janine: Spinning Silver, Naomi Novik’s standalone follow-up to the Nebula-winning Uprooted, is a fantasy novel set in a Lithuania/Latvia/Russia-based world, a land called Lithvas.
Miryem Mandelstam, a Jewish girl from an impoverished money-lending family (her father is a terrible moneylender), lives in a small village. Eventually, when her mother sickens and the family can’t even afford a doctor, Miryem goes to collect on the villagers’ debts. Miryem has to harden her heart to do this, because the winters in Lithvas are harsh and have been growing harsher. But she is successful.
There is a road that runs near Miryem’s village, called the Staryk road, which belongs to the Staryk, an elven-like people who live in a parallel land unreachable by mortals. The Staryk road is icy and it moves, sometimes running very close to the village, other times more distant from it.
One day, while riding in an open sleigh with her mother on her way home from her grandfather’s house in the city of Vysnia, Miryem boasts to her mother that she can turn silver into gold. Only then does she notice that the Staryk road is close by. Soon after, Miryem’s house is visited by the Staryk, and she finds a bag of silver on her doorstep.
The Staryk have been known to turn people to ice, so a frightened Miryem takes the magical silver to the city of Vysnia, to Isaac, a jeweler, and Isaac, like a man possessed, makes the silver into a ring, which he then sells to the Duke of Vysnia.
Miryem gives half the gold she earns to the jeweler. The rest, she gives back to the King of the Staryk. But because she cannot bear not to profit from her labor—after all, her father’s propensity to do this brought her mother to death’s doorstep—she demands to know what the Staryk king will give her in return.
Furious, the Staryk king replies that he’ll require her to turn his silver to gold twice more. If she fails, she dies, but it she succeeds, he’ll make her his queen. Of course, Miryem desperately fears either outcome.
Besides Miryem, there are two other major POV characters. The first is Wanda, an impoverished girl with an abusive father. Wanda’s mother and the children her mother carried, only to lose them, are buried under a tree at the edge of the Staryk forest—a tree with magical properties, which Wanda believes contains her mother’s spirit.
When her father decides to marry off Wanda, she prays to her mother under the tree, and her mother tells her to wait. Two days later, Miryem, trying to collect on a debt that Wanda’s father owes, demands that if he can’t pay, Wanda come to work for her.
At Miryem’s house, Wanda is warmer and better-fed, and she also learns math and how to help Miryem with debt-collecting. Then Wanda’s sixteen-year-old brother, Sergey, nearly dies after hunting in the forbidden forest of the Staryk. Together with Stepon, her ten-year-old brother, Wanda saves Sergey. With that act, an alliance if formed between Wanda and her brothers, against their abusive father.
The third major character in the book is Irina, the duke’s daughter, who eventually acquires the ring made of the Staryk silver, as well as a necklace and a crown made of the same material. Irina is a quarter Staryk herself (raiding Staryk have been known to rape mortal women), and with the jewelry, the very plain Irina begins to look beautiful to others.
The jewelry also gives Irina a magical ability to cross from Lithvas to the Staryk realm through mirrors, something no other mortal can do. But Irina’s father is determined to marry her to the cruel tsar, who is rumored to be possessed by a demon.
Miryem, Wanda and Irina must all parlay their bad situations into better ones.
Miryem’s storyline was the one I loved best, but I thought Wanda and Irina were also great characters. All three were not only strong, but at times, cold in different ways.
Miryem’s coldness came from her opposition to her father’s overgenerosity, but it was also a reflection of the antisemitism that her family had encountered.
Wanda’s coldness was rooted in the loss of her mother, and portrayed through her initial resentment of her brothers. She was also initially suspicious of the Mandelstams’ faith, but this was mostly due to ignorance, not malice.
Irina’s coldness was fascinating to me because it stemmed from the position she didn’t want but was thrust into. Once she was put on the path of leadership, she started to think like a leader, prioritizing the good of all Lithvas, even if that meant sacrificing individuals.
Jennie: I really liked all three characters’ toughness, and indeed coldness. It made them perversely more sympathetic to me than if they’d just accepted their fates. Instead each tried to better their situation, and at times doing so required a certain hard-heartedness. Irina was probably the one of the three I felt the most distance from emotionally, but at the same time I, like you, was moved by how well she stepped into a role she didn’t want.
Sirius: I think I *understood* all three characters’ toughness and in a lot of situations I found it necessary and understandable; but I did not like it, no. In fact, I appreciated very much that part of Miryem’s journey seemed to be not only taking charge of her destiny and doing things that needed to be done, but also learning how to care. And I ended up hating Irina. Unfortunately, I cannot explain why without giving out very big spoilers, but to me at least, one of her actions crossed the line bigtime.
Jayne: One then two then (suddenly) three young women who are … disappointed in their fathers. To put it mildly. So Miryem, Wanda and Irina decide, one way or another, to take charge of as much of their lives as possible. Miryem by taking over the business from a father she sees as ineffectual (though we begin to see hints of why he doesn’t press too hard against his non-Jewish neighbors in the pogroms that have happened), Wanda in taking the job at Miryem’s, secreting money and manipulating her father’s belief in how long she needs to work to pay off his debt. Then comes Irina who escapes her father through marriage.
Janine: The novel has six POV characters—Miryem, Wanda, Irina and three side characters. Of the latter three, I liked the childlike perspective of Stepon the best—his fear and relief were palpable, and his innocence made him a wonderful mix of (moral) clarity and confusion (about what to do).
Jennie: Stepon got on my nerves a bit. I thought he was realistically portrayed as a child, with a child’s mind, but I think I might have preferred just getting the three main perspectives (I found it occasionally confusing as to whose POV we were getting, which didn’t help).
Sirius: I kind of agree with both of you. I liked Stepon’s POV because to me it felt the most distinct one, but I would rather have just three main characters’ narrating.
Jayne: Yeah, I didn’t care for that many first-person narrators especially as there were no indications at the beginning of each chapter as to who the perspective would be coming from. I had to determine who was taking over this time thus jerking me out of the spell the story was trying to weave. I did like Stepon just because he seemed to be the most distinct for me. I wondered why Novik ended up with this then realized that after certain characters got moved to different locations, a new narrator was the only way to keep an eye on what was happening back at the farm – so to speak.
Janine: I actually liked that I had to figure out who was speaking, though it was a bit jarring. I was impressed with Novik for being able to establish who the character was within the first paragraph without giving us the names.
Re. the last two POV characters—the tsar’s cynical sarcasm made me laugh and start to like him despite his villainy, and Magreta (Irina’s maid / motherly figure) had the frailty of the old, and nicely balanced a story that was mostly told from the perspective of the young. Her past feelings toward the child Irina had a nice complexity to their evolution.
Jayne: Magreta was one of my favorite characters. She initially seems so frail and silly but her backstory reveals someone who has faced danger and survived then forged a place for herself.
Jennie: The interesting thing about the tsar’s viewpoint was that he came off slightly smarter and more self-aware in his POV compared to how Irina saw him. I thought that was interesting.
Sirius: And once again I cannot explain why I feel the way I feel about the tsar without spoilers, but I really disliked him. However, I disliked what happened between him and Irina even more.
Spoiler: Show
Jayne: I agree with you about the squirrels and I never warmed up to him before the point where I stopped reading.
Janine: His killing the squirrels as a boy disturbed me a lot too.
Spoiler: Show
Janine: The Staryk king, Miryem’s parents, and Wanda’s brother Sergey are also important characters, but we don’t get their POVs. I really liked Sergey, the Staryk king fascinated me, Miryem’s parents were heartwarming, and I found even some of the minor characters really interesting.
Jennie: I thought the secondary characters had a lot of complexity; even the villains weren’t entirely one-dimensional.
Spoiler: Show
Janine: There’s also a lot of thematic richness here – the book is an exploration of literal and figurative coldness and warmth, poverty and wealth, debt and reciprocation. Other themes are commitments both ironclad and escapable, stinginess vs. generosity, and thefts.
It is fascinating to see these themes in a book where Judaism looms large, because qualities like wealth, cold-hearted debt-collecting, thieving and stinginess are ascribed to Jewish people in stereotypes. Novik is not only examining these qualities in the book, but unraveling the stereotypes and the dehumanization that attends them.
Sirius: This was my favorite part of the book because off the top of my head, I’ve never ever read the story with a Jewish heroine playing such an important role and where, as you say, Judaism looms large.
Janine: I loved that too. Parallel to the mortal world is the Staryk society, which operates very differently.
Spoiler: Show
Jayne: I started to get annoyed with the Staryk. There are hints and vague but menacing descriptions of them. Who are they? What are they? But it went on too long for me before we finally started to get some answers.
Jennie: Honestly, it took me a bit to even understand how the Staryk worked! Their portrayal was well-done but their value system felt so foreign that it took me a while to understand that they weren’t one-dimensional villains (though there was still the pillaging and the raping, which is brushed aside a bit in the end).
Janine: I was fascinated by them.
Spoiler: Show
Although I found the book romantic, I would not call it a romance. Rather, it is a book about young women thrust into difficult circumstances by men, and who learn to acquire agency and free themselves.
Jayne: Too bad that each woman is forced into worse circumstances just as she has gained some degree of control over her life.
Janine: The Act I turning point is where things go bad for the protagonist(s) in any novel, so I expected it.
Sirius: I would not call the book a romance, but where Irina is concerned I do not find the ending romantic either, I found it contrived and did not buy a potential future for them at all.
Jennie: I actually very much liked the ambiguity of the ending with Irina and the tsar.
Janine: All three women face difficult moral dilemmas.
Spoiler: Show
The characters have a nice multidimensionality. Miryem starts the book feeling cold and ungenerous, but paradoxically, the more time she spends with in the cold, wintry Staryk world, the more she discovers warmth and generosity in herself.
Miryem’s father, Panov Mandelstam, is so generous, warm, and forgiving of others’ debts that his own family goes hungry and cold while those he lends to fare better. At first, this seems like weakness, but by the end of the book, it’s reframed somewhat.
Jennie: I still felt Panov Mandelstam, while a good person, failed in his responsibilities and let Miryem and his wife down. I liked him but I wouldn’t want to have to depend on him.
Sirius: I agree with Jennie. I thought Miryem’s father was quite useless in providing for his family. And I even got annoyed at Miryem’s mom in the beginning when she dared to complain that Miryem was becoming cold. Of course they both loved her very much, but dear god, she was providing for you people. Shut up or help her if you ask me.
Jayne: Hahahahaha. My thoughts exactly. Though I did begin to slowly understand why he didn’t bust down doors for repayments I still felt that he needed to get his act together and at least knock. Especially as he seemed to be watching his beloved wife slipping towards death’s door and reaching out for the doorknob.
Janine: Yes! My sympathy was and remains with Miryem there. However, as the story progressed her father’s kindness to Wanda and her brothers made me like him better. His softheartedness was never mitigated, but the upside of it got to shine a bit more.
Miryem’s grandfather, a much better moneylender, initially seems tightfisted, and doesn’t want Miryem’s grandmother to buy young Miryem pretty dresses because he won’t throw good money after bad. But he is actually the most helpful person to Miryem in terms of his advice to her.
Spoiler: Show
Spinning Silver has terrific worldbuilding and a lovely fairytale feel. Among its influences are the Rumpelstiltskin fairy tale, Cinderella, and the Hades and Persephone myth, but much of it read as original and fresh to me.
Jennie:
Spoiler: Show
Janine: Novik’s prose style is pure joy to read; her metaphors can feel like flights of fancy but they never seem distracting or excessive. Lines like “I suppose it is only to be expected from people who didn’t take on debts and were used to entire chambers wandering off and having to be called like cats” tickled my funny bone, and there were also sentences that perfectly hit a darker emotional note, such as “And then he stepped forward and the heavy door swung shut in my face, leaving me with a casket full of silver coins and a belly full of dismay.”
Jennie: I loved the prose. I really enjoy Novik’s writing. This was not a quick read for me, but it wasn’t slow because it was boring; it was more that it was rich and I needed to savor it.
Jayne: Slow is the word I would use. Deadly slow. “Get on with it” slow.
Janine: I was dying to know what would happen next so it was a page turner for me.
The imagery in the book and the use of color are just lovely. The Staryk’s winter kingdom is described in colors like white, silver and blue.
Jayne: The land of the Staryk was described in such extensive detail and at such length that I began to get bored. Perhaps this was intended as a way to show how bored Miryem was there but to paraphrase the way she told off the Staryk lord, it’s not a good idea to bore the people reading the book if you want them to keep reading. The bored feeling I got in the endless descriptions of the Staryk world continued. Lots of dull, dull, dull before anything would happen. If you like fascination with mind numbing details about so much nothing – here you go. Me? I need a higher proportion of action to description.
Janine: Many of those details turned out to be relevant to the plot, though some of that wasn’t apparent until late in the book.
I appreciated the way in which Miryem’s faith mattered in the story. Plot points revolve around Miryem’s need to observe Shabbat and dance the hora at her cousin’s wedding and this is treated with normalcy and not othered by the book, only by the antisemitic characters.
I ended up liking this book much better than Uprooted, which I’d had problems with. Some of this is due to representation—this is the first fantasy novel I’ve read with a Jewish main character—but a lot of it was due to the loveliness of the book.
Sirius: See, it is shocking to me when you say that this was your first fantasy novel with a Jewish main heroine. I would have thought that in the United States there would be a lot of stories with Jewish leads.
Janine: There are a lot, but mostly in literary, mainstream and women’s fiction. In most genre fiction I’ve come across fewer, and in the fantasy genre, even less.
Jennie: I liked it a lot as well, and very much liked the Jewish aspects of the story, though I’m not Jewish. I also really liked the way the fairytale aspects came together at the end.
Spoiler: Show
Sirius: I loved the Jewish aspects of the book and appreciated Miryem’s journey, in fact the book often read to me as a historical (it is a compliment!). I mean I know that it has magic in it and the setting encompasses several of eastern European countries, so it is not really a historical, but the detailed writing made the narrative very realistic to me.
Jayne: Those were the aspects I did like: how religion was central to the characters backgrounds and to their actions and thoughts. I enjoyed the Eastern European setting though unfortunately, I’ve not loved either this book or another I read last year – “The Bear and the Nightingale” by Katherine Arden which was set in Russia.
Sirius: However, overall feeling I finished was guilt. I mean, I don’t mind hating a story which I do not find well-executed, but here of course I can see it is an extremely well-written book, with rich themes and characters, as you guys described it. But Irina spoiled the book for me and I cannot say that I will ever want to reread it again.
Jayne: Well, you finished it. I got to the 80% point and couldn’t take it anymore. It was like trying to slog uphill through deep mud in the pouring rain. I didn’t want to waste any more of my life trying. Thankfully I knew going into it that this is not a romance – or rather that romance isn’t the main theme of the book.
Spoiler: Show
Janine:
Spoiler: Show
Sirius: I will go with double grade: B/D. B for the whole story and D for Irina.
Jayne: My grade is DNF.
Janine: My grade is an A-/A. It’s the best book I’ve read this year so far.
Jennie: I’ll give it an A-/A as well.
Wow. What an interesting review! I skipped all the spoilers. I’m still on the fence about reading it.
Thank you Cleo .
@cleo: LOL, I don’t blame you. It is certainly a review that pulls one in two directions.
@cleo: Did you read Uprooted? I know I liked it better than Janine, but I do see some similarities between the two books.
Jayne, I’m with you in that I did not finish Spinning Silver. I gave up far sooner than you though; I think I read about 80 pages or so. I was disappointed as I’d enjoyed Uprooted.
I fully expected to give up because of my intense dislike for the Tsar and the Staryk, but I persevered and am glad for it. There weren’t any nicely-wrapped endings here, which was kind of appealing; no telling what these characters will do when we’re not looking.
SPINNING SILVER is probably my favorite of all the books I’ve read this year–I loved everything about it. I loved the characters, the writing, the descriptions, and definitely the romances–I love romances involving cold and hostile heroes who fall in love despite themselves.
To me, the book mostly played with the idea of debt but like a chorus or a roundel, with each different story striking a different note. The debts Miryam contracted with her clients were only the beginning–all the familial relationships played on the idea of debt, too. Did Miryam’s grandfather owe her mother any support, when they were starving? Did Irina owe it to her father to marry the groom of his choice? Did Wanda owe it to her father to work off his debts and accept his beatings?
The fact that the book kept asking these questions is what made the Staryk so interesting to me–the trait that made them seem so ‘cruel’ was essentially their refusal to enter into debts. All exchanges were exact, complete, with nothing left over. You couldn’t say thank you. You couldn’t give more or less than you’d promised. You couldn’t give gifts at all–there’s a huge literature about the ‘economy’ of gift giving in various societies–which segues into economies of debt. It was a perfect and necessary contrast to a story about a debt-collector.
To me, the first lines of the story announced that this would be Rumpelstiltskin from the perspective of Rumpelstiltskin–and the book insists, from first to last, that *carrying debt* is one of the most essential and often *admirable* human behaviors. There’s the potential for abuse on either side, and examples in the story, often paired–Irina’s father makes an interesting contrast with the prince’s mother, for example.
I could go on and on. Really, I’ve hardly ever been so satisfied by a book because I hardly ever feel like a book has examined a single subject so thoroughly, from so many sides. While also being super fun for me to read.
Darlynne to me Tsar was a very jarring character – basically I disliked him too a lot , but when his circumstances were revealed I thought that I was supposed to only pity him ( and if I am supposed to do that then I would not like Irina even more than I did if it possible ), but nothing in his actions to me warranted pity . Only his circumstances in life I did . I do agree though that we cannot predict what the characters will do when we are not looking .
@Sirius: Can you describe in spoiler tags what Irina did that you disliked so much?
@Kareni: I haven’t read Uprooted – and at this point doubt that I will – but I loved the Temeraire books. I’d read such good reviews of Uprooted that I had high hopes for Spinning Silver but – ugh.
I fall into the ‘loved it’ camp… it did seem to start a bit slow for me, and I felt a little thrown out of the flow by the changing narrators. But I loved the depiction of Judaism and the setting and historical aspect of it, and I came to appreciate the way the three heroines complemented each other in actions and responsibilities. And the wedding scene from Stepon’s POV? I adored that and the way it pulled the crisscrossing actions into a new, alchemical tension. I read this right after finishing “The Calculating Stars” by Mary Robinette Kowal, so if you are looking for fantasy/sci fi romance?/romantic elements? (not primarily a romance) with a Jewish heroine, perhaps check that out? Both these books spoke to me, and seem timely (esp given the frightening rise of more overt and unabashed antiSemitism, the need for strong female agency (and, in Calculating Stars, looming environmental deadlines). I’m pushing both titles on my 13yo daughter (alongside Stacy Abrams’ Minority Leader) b/c I wish I had so many fabulous heroines centered and rooted in the heart of such great stories when I was growing up! (And even though I’m not in complete agreement with all 4 reviewers – it was fun to see all of your perspectives! Curious to know more about what stirred Sirius’ hate for Irina. This one was an immediate re-read (and I was curious to see where the story forked when she first released it as a short story in the anthology Starlit Wood) Thank you all for the review!
Erin Satie and Jopdeloop sure
Buried Comment: Show
.
@Janine: A recent fantasy book that is centered around Jewish heroines (and heavily inspired by Christina Rossetti’s “Goblin Market”) is Sisters of the Winter Wood by Rena Rossner.
@Erin Satie: I love what you say here and I agree with you, it’s a book that plumbs its themes very deeply. BTW, Lila Garrott has a great review of Spinning Silver at Locus that is more articulate about the wonders of this book than anything I could say.
@Darlynne and @Sirius: I found the characters very consistent. They are only as unpredictable as people are in the real world, and one of the things I loved in the book is how many were reframed.
@Jayne: I think you might like Uprooted better than this book. I was talking to my husband, who also read both books, about how you felt Spinning Silver was slow, and I felt differently. And he said, “a lot of the the conflict and what happens is interior, so someone who likes external action won’t find it as satisfying.” And he pointed out that the action in Uprooted is more external. I don’t know if that’s why you disliked Spinning Silver, but if it is, then you might like Uprooted.
@Joopdeloop: The hora dancing scene was maybe my favorite in the book (unless it was the last scene, which I also loved). I had a paragraph which I cut out of the review where I said that I feel there’s a kind of magic to the hora in real life, because of how communal it is and the way it is danced at weddings. And in that scene, it felt like Novik captured that magic and enlarged it, so that the magic the Staryk performed felt like the magic of the hora, but expanded.
@Floating Lush: How did you like Sisters of the Winter Wood? I’m very tempted to check it out, not only for the Jewish heroines, but because I adore Goblin Market.
@Janine: I listened to it on audio, and I really liked the narrator. I think the plot could have used a little bit of tightening, and since I listened to it, I didn’t realize that the younger sister’s chapters (it’s told in alternating chapters between the two sisters) are in verse. Verseish? It doesn’t really adhere to any poetry rules, more just has creative line breaks, which can be annoying to read, but was unnoticable in audio. I’m not super familiar with Goblin Market, but I think the author hits the main points of the poem, while still making Sisters her own thing. And praise be, it’s not a Holocaust story!
So quite good, I liked it, but not AMAZING. The cover though is gorgeous.
@Floating Lush: Thanks! I’ll take a look at it.
Goblin Market is wonderful and the writing just gorgeous. I have this edition which is illustrated with pre-Raphaelite paintings by Rossetti’s brother, Dante Gabriel Rossetti:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/430788
I think it may be out of print now but it’s worth tracking down. The thing that surprised me about the poem was how sensuous it was—verging on sensual, really. All while maintains a Victorian sensibility.
I was turned on to Rossetti’s poetry after I read Possession by A.S. Byatt. If you’ve read it by chance, the shorter Christabel LaMotte poems are reminiscent of Rossetti’s work.
@Janine: I read Possession years and years ago, but never (I don’t think?) read any Rossetti. I know about them, and am passingly familiar with her brother’s work. I think they were characters in a book–no idea what one–that I read at some point.
Thanks so much for this most comprehensive review of Spinning Silver. I really appreciated the various reader viewpoints, and the exposition. I am very much in the “loved it” camp. I hope Naomi Novik writes more novels of this ilk, which really are like adult fairy tales which tackle real world issues, and make us think beyond the the scope of the tale itself. The alternating POVs were quite refreshing, and as a discerning reader, one rapidly realises that the first person narrator has changed from the previous section just from the tone of the narrative. I thought it was romantic although it would not be classified as a romance (unlike Uprooted which may be more a romance). I didn’t find the descriptions of the Staryk world boring at all – and I think the winter scenes were integrally part of the story and atmosphere – a bit like Gethen in Ursula Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness. All in all, I would recommend this book highly, and hope you do joint reviews more often!
@msaggie: I love doing the joint reviews but usually they are two-person. The logistics of doing a four-person review like this are complicated, and you can see how long this review ran, too.