<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malle Vallik, Harlequin&#8217;s Digital Director, Answers Questions on Harlequin Horizons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader&#039;s point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harlequin&#8217;s Self-Publishing Venture &#8211; A Blog Surfer&#8217;s Journal &#171; Tia Nevitt</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-224094</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlequin&#8217;s Self-Publishing Venture &#8211; A Blog Surfer&#8217;s Journal &#171; Tia Nevitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-224094</guid>
		<description>[...] However, it had a linkstravaganza upon the subject, so I found myself following a link to Dear Author that summarizes many of the arguments that authors have against this venture. They also have a response from Harlequin. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, it had a linkstravaganza upon the subject, so I found myself following a link to Dear Author that summarizes many of the arguments that authors have against this venture. They also have a response from Harlequin. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Harlequin hubbub &#171; Collection Developments @ Sno-Isle</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-224066</link>
		<dc:creator>the Harlequin hubbub &#171; Collection Developments @ Sno-Isle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-224066</guid>
		<description>[...] immediately, criticism emerged.  a Harlequin rep tried to reassure readers and authors by explaining that it wasn&#8217;t a case of brand dilution, that it would be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] immediately, criticism emerged.  a Harlequin rep tried to reassure readers and authors by explaining that it wasn&#8217;t a case of brand dilution, that it would be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FiledBy &#124; Blog &#187; Google Settlement Dates + Harlequin Horizons</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223934</link>
		<dc:creator>FiledBy &#124; Blog &#187; Google Settlement Dates + Harlequin Horizons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223934</guid>
		<description>[...] Vallik, Digital Director for Harlequin, responded to similar concerns raised by the Dear Author blog: &#8220;There are a number of reasons to select [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vallik, Digital Director for Harlequin, responded to similar concerns raised by the Dear Author blog: &#8220;There are a number of reasons to select [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Harlequin Fiasco &#171; Embrace the Shadows</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223902</link>
		<dc:creator>The Harlequin Fiasco &#171; Embrace the Shadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223902</guid>
		<description>[...] led to a firestorm of opinions all over the blog-o-sphere. The most widely read, IMHO, where at Dear Author and Smart Bitches, Trashy Books.  It was like watching a train wreck. Some speculated that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] led to a firestorm of opinions all over the blog-o-sphere. The most widely read, IMHO, where at Dear Author and Smart Bitches, Trashy Books.  It was like watching a train wreck. Some speculated that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radiant Curses &#38; Bound Sorceresses &#124; Literary Escapism</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223861</link>
		<dc:creator>Radiant Curses &#38; Bound Sorceresses &#124; Literary Escapism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223861</guid>
		<description>[...] Dear Author – Malle Vallik, Harlequin’s Digital Director, Answers Questions on Harlequin Horizons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear Author – Malle Vallik, Harlequin’s Digital Director, Answers Questions on Harlequin Horizons [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not a Haiku Sunday &#171; Teresa Bodwell Writes</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223671</link>
		<dc:creator>Not a Haiku Sunday &#171; Teresa Bodwell Writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223671</guid>
		<description>[...] uninspired. Not sure whether it&#8217;s the incredible amount of space my brain is devoting to the Harlequin Horizon fiasco. You want more links? More? Well, you get the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uninspired. Not sure whether it&#8217;s the incredible amount of space my brain is devoting to the Harlequin Horizon fiasco. You want more links? More? Well, you get the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;esprit d&#8217;escalier &#187; Harlequin Horizons and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Deal</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223540</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;esprit d&#8217;escalier &#187; Harlequin Horizons and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223540</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t earn anywhere near that.  They earn royalties at 50% of the net price, according to Harlequin&#8217;s Digital Director Malle Vallik&#8217;s response to that question at Dear Author (comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t earn anywhere near that.  They earn royalties at 50% of the net price, according to Harlequin&#8217;s Digital Director Malle Vallik&#8217;s response to that question at Dear Author (comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My take on self-pub/Harlequin Horizons/vanity presses, etc &#171; Trivial Pursuits</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223476</link>
		<dc:creator>My take on self-pub/Harlequin Horizons/vanity presses, etc &#171; Trivial Pursuits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223476</guid>
		<description>[...] It will be almost impossible for a writer to make a profit there, because they take 50% of net.  What&#8217;s net?  Net is what is left AFTER cost.  From the questions answered over at the Dear Author blog&#8230; Malle: The content is completely owned by the author. Royalties are 50% net from both eBooks and pri... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It will be almost impossible for a writer to make a profit there, because they take 50% of net.  What&#8217;s net?  Net is what is left AFTER cost.  From the questions answered over at the Dear Author blog&#8230; Malle: The content is completely owned by the author. Royalties are 50% net from both eBooks and pri&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlequin broadens its Horizons by adding vanity publishing &#171; Romance Writers of Australia</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223469</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlequin broadens its Horizons by adding vanity publishing &#171; Romance Writers of Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223469</guid>
		<description>[...] Dear Author [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear Author [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223427</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223427</guid>
		<description>This really worries me. I do look at the E-harlequin writing section from time to time. I do have some thoughts that I might want to try to write a book at some point,though most of my ideas are really outside the box in regards to time period and setting, when I have some time though I am in Graduate School at the moment. I was looking last week and saw that Harlequin was starting an e-publishing site. I thought that it was not a bad idea because a lot of people my age like digial books and if the book is a big hit than everybody wins. But the pay to publish one stinks and I really wondering what the pubisher is thinking at this point. I know times are tough and the industry is suffering because of the recession but this is NOT the way to solve the problem. 
 
 I know the Harlequin gets a lot of bad submissions the reason is that they are the last major publishing house in the industry to take unagented manscripts and this means that you get people that have no idea how much their own book stinks so it can painful to read these books. This does not mean that the solutiion is to allow these messes to be published if the author has enough money to do so. I have a big worry that this action is going to bring down the entire company and this sadden me very much. The reason is that it has been the only place that publishes books that are outside the norm of light happy Regencies, a trend that needs to die right now, so with this action reader may lose their only publisher that seems to care what their readers think and this may be the biggest loss of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really worries me. I do look at the E-harlequin writing section from time to time. I do have some thoughts that I might want to try to write a book at some point,though most of my ideas are really outside the box in regards to time period and setting, when I have some time though I am in Graduate School at the moment. I was looking last week and saw that Harlequin was starting an e-publishing site. I thought that it was not a bad idea because a lot of people my age like digial books and if the book is a big hit than everybody wins. But the pay to publish one stinks and I really wondering what the pubisher is thinking at this point. I know times are tough and the industry is suffering because of the recession but this is NOT the way to solve the problem. </p>
<p> I know the Harlequin gets a lot of bad submissions the reason is that they are the last major publishing house in the industry to take unagented manscripts and this means that you get people that have no idea how much their own book stinks so it can painful to read these books. This does not mean that the solutiion is to allow these messes to be published if the author has enough money to do so. I have a big worry that this action is going to bring down the entire company and this sadden me very much. The reason is that it has been the only place that publishes books that are outside the norm of light happy Regencies, a trend that needs to die right now, so with this action reader may lose their only publisher that seems to care what their readers think and this may be the biggest loss of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poison Ivy</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223410</link>
		<dc:creator>Poison Ivy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223410</guid>
		<description>No one reads slush a &lt;em&gt;first&lt;/em&gt; time unless they&#039;re getting paid to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one reads slush a <em>first</em> time unless they&#8217;re getting paid to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223406</link>
		<dc:creator>James Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223406</guid>
		<description>.@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-223233&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Julia Sullivan&lt;/a&gt;: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Some lovely, well-meaning soul cobbles together a not-ready-for-publication manuscript and pays her $600 and gets her Harlequin Horizons books.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So far we&#039;ve mostly been considering the book that&#039;s been rejected because it ... isn&#039;t very good.  That&#039;s the great majority of them, true.

But consider the case of the book that&#039;s rejected by Harlequin for some other reason than &quot;stinks on ice.&quot; There are other reasons that books get rejected, after all, ranging from &quot;Doesn&#039;t quite fit our line,&quot; to &quot;We&#039;ve already bagged our limit.&quot;  Suppose there&#039;s an author whose manuscript could have gone to Pocket for a nice advance, garnering sales, gaining fans, and launching a career?  Suppose that author takes the bait, plunks down a few grand, and gets seventy-five sales out of it.

Where&#039;s the upside for &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; in that scenario?

Also, and this is real-world, I see it every day: The authors who, instead of sitting home and working on their next books instead spend all their free time, energy, and loose cash on promotion and marketing that&#039;s pre-doomed to failure (they still get the same seventy-five sales).  Where&#039;s their professional growth and career going to come from?

Readers won&#039;t notice or care about the vanity-published books.  They aren&#039;t in the stream of commerce right now.  They aren&#039;t going to be, either.  Unless and until the reading public develops a taste for raw slush.  When that happens, within two weeks the bookstores will  have their Unedited Slush sections right down front.

But I don&#039;t see it happening.  No one reads slush for fun.  No one reads slush a second time unless they&#039;re getting paid to do it.  Not even if they&#039;re told that one or two out of every hundred will be a gem.

What we need to concentrate on here are the authors.  RWA and MWA, as author-advocate organizations, are on top of this.  And we need to think about the corrosive effect on the publishers who follow this path.  No good can come of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.@<a href="#comment-223233" rel="nofollow">Julia Sullivan</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p><em>Some lovely, well-meaning soul cobbles together a not-ready-for-publication manuscript and pays her $600 and gets her Harlequin Horizons books.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>So far we&#8217;ve mostly been considering the book that&#8217;s been rejected because it &#8230; isn&#8217;t very good.  That&#8217;s the great majority of them, true.</p>
<p>But consider the case of the book that&#8217;s rejected by Harlequin for some other reason than &#8220;stinks on ice.&#8221; There are other reasons that books get rejected, after all, ranging from &#8220;Doesn&#8217;t quite fit our line,&#8221; to &#8220;We&#8217;ve already bagged our limit.&#8221;  Suppose there&#8217;s an author whose manuscript could have gone to Pocket for a nice advance, garnering sales, gaining fans, and launching a career?  Suppose that author takes the bait, plunks down a few grand, and gets seventy-five sales out of it.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the upside for <em>anyone</em> in that scenario?</p>
<p>Also, and this is real-world, I see it every day: The authors who, instead of sitting home and working on their next books instead spend all their free time, energy, and loose cash on promotion and marketing that&#8217;s pre-doomed to failure (they still get the same seventy-five sales).  Where&#8217;s their professional growth and career going to come from?</p>
<p>Readers won&#8217;t notice or care about the vanity-published books.  They aren&#8217;t in the stream of commerce right now.  They aren&#8217;t going to be, either.  Unless and until the reading public develops a taste for raw slush.  When that happens, within two weeks the bookstores will  have their Unedited Slush sections right down front.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t see it happening.  No one reads slush for fun.  No one reads slush a second time unless they&#8217;re getting paid to do it.  Not even if they&#8217;re told that one or two out of every hundred will be a gem.</p>
<p>What we need to concentrate on here are the authors.  RWA and MWA, as author-advocate organizations, are on top of this.  And we need to think about the corrosive effect on the publishers who follow this path.  No good can come of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Leeland</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Leeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223388</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-223382&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jane&lt;/a&gt;: Oh sorry if I missed that Jane.  I was asking thinking you had an inside line to the story.  (And thought I missed something).  You usually have great insight.  
Primarily my questions were aimed toward Miss Vallik.  
And word is that HQN has told its authors it&#039;s going to try and get the Harlequin name off of Harlequin Horizon.  (According to a &quot;secret source&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-223382" rel="nofollow">Jane</a>: Oh sorry if I missed that Jane.  I was asking thinking you had an inside line to the story.  (And thought I missed something).  You usually have great insight.<br />
Primarily my questions were aimed toward Miss Vallik.<br />
And word is that HQN has told its authors it&#8217;s going to try and get the Harlequin name off of Harlequin Horizon.  (According to a &#8220;secret source&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223382</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-223347&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Jennifer Leeland&lt;/a&gt;  Have you read all my comments upthread Ms. Leeland? Because if you had, you would have seen where I said that this is not a good value for authors.  I&#039;m not sure why you are asking &lt;em&gt;me&lt;/em&gt; these questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-223347" rel="nofollow">@Jennifer Leeland</a>  Have you read all my comments upthread Ms. Leeland? Because if you had, you would have seen where I said that this is not a good value for authors.  I&#8217;m not sure why you are asking <em>me</em> these questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O-Anon</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223379</link>
		<dc:creator>O-Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223379</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;HQN Ho&lt;/strong&gt; must go viral now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>HQN Ho</strong> must go viral now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News on the Horizon &#124; Literary Escapism</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223367</link>
		<dc:creator>News on the Horizon &#124; Literary Escapism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223367</guid>
		<description>[...] Dear Author &#8211; Malle Vallik, Harlequin’s Digital Director, Answers Questions on Harlequin Horizons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dear Author &#8211; Malle Vallik, Harlequin’s Digital Director, Answers Questions on Harlequin Horizons [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlequin Uproar&#8230; &#124; Keri Arthur</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223363</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlequin Uproar&#8230; &#124; Keri Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223363</guid>
		<description>[...] real WTF moment for me came from an answer Malle Vallik gave to this following question over on the Dear Author [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] real WTF moment for me came from an answer Malle Vallik gave to this following question over on the Dear Author [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivia</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223356</link>
		<dc:creator>olivia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223356</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This reeks of top-down, of a “study” maybe done by a management consultancy. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know or much care about the source and system of the decision-making, and won&#039;t speculate about that.  I don&#039;t think the truth will--or can--ever be known.

I care deeply about the outcome and impacts, to be more fully revealed in the fullness of time.  The past 48 hours have been very interesting.  And painful for so many.

One thing you said is certain: This reeks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This reeks of top-down, of a “study” maybe done by a management consultancy. </p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know or much care about the source and system of the decision-making, and won&#8217;t speculate about that.  I don&#8217;t think the truth will&#8211;or can&#8211;ever be known.</p>
<p>I care deeply about the outcome and impacts, to be more fully revealed in the fullness of time.  The past 48 hours have been very interesting.  And painful for so many.</p>
<p>One thing you said is certain: This reeks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estara</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223350</link>
		<dc:creator>Estara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223350</guid>
		<description>Some suggestions for links to people who do &lt;em&gt;excellent self-published ebooks&lt;/em&gt; (not vanity published) - the problem is that only one of these authors I&#039;ve read in self-published form hasn&#039;t first appeared in print at one of the big houses (they&#039;re also mostly not romance authors), so I would expect that it&#039;s difficult to build up reader numbers if you aren&#039;t already somewhat known:

- Ann Somerville and her &lt;a href=&quot;http://stores.lulu.com/logophilos&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Darshian Tales&lt;/a&gt; (I&#039;m getting into her Samhain series now as well) at lulu.com (brilliant epic fantasy, with m/m that is simply part of the story and not used for cheap thrills). Actually, I think you can read all of the Darshian Tales for free on her website (where I Highly recommend reading A Fluffy Tale), but they&#039;re LONG! - and good.

- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookviewcafe.com/index.php/BVC-eBookstore/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Book View Café&lt;/a&gt;: loads of previously published sf&amp;f authors collectively offering backlist novels and newly written anthologies in ebook form (Sherwood Smith will join soon, yay!) - reads like a who&#039;s who of (mostly) female sf writing (they even have Ursula LeGuin in there - although only as a comic author/artist) ^^  - they&#039;ve just released a collective short story backlist anthology and in December there&#039;ll be a steampunk anthology with all new short stories. You can also read many of the novels in serial instalments free on their site.

- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cherryh.com/WaveWithoutAShore/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wave without a Shore&lt;/a&gt;, where C.J. Cherryh, Jane Fancher and Lynn Abbey are working on their own ebook press for their backlist. Haven&#039;t opened yet though.

- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inkalicious.com/inkstore.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inkalicious where Michele Jerott Albert&lt;/a&gt; is selling five of her out-of-print romance suspense novels as ebooks and you get the first one completely free (which is why I discovered her).

All these ebooks are drm-free. All great value for the money spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some suggestions for links to people who do <em>excellent self-published ebooks</em> (not vanity published) &#8211; the problem is that only one of these authors I&#8217;ve read in self-published form hasn&#8217;t first appeared in print at one of the big houses (they&#8217;re also mostly not romance authors), so I would expect that it&#8217;s difficult to build up reader numbers if you aren&#8217;t already somewhat known:</p>
<p>- Ann Somerville and her <a href="http://stores.lulu.com/logophilos" rel="nofollow">Darshian Tales</a> (I&#8217;m getting into her Samhain series now as well) at lulu.com (brilliant epic fantasy, with m/m that is simply part of the story and not used for cheap thrills). Actually, I think you can read all of the Darshian Tales for free on her website (where I Highly recommend reading A Fluffy Tale), but they&#8217;re LONG! &#8211; and good.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.bookviewcafe.com/index.php/BVC-eBookstore/" rel="nofollow">Book View Café</a>: loads of previously published sf&amp;f authors collectively offering backlist novels and newly written anthologies in ebook form (Sherwood Smith will join soon, yay!) &#8211; reads like a who&#8217;s who of (mostly) female sf writing (they even have Ursula LeGuin in there &#8211; although only as a comic author/artist) ^^  &#8211; they&#8217;ve just released a collective short story backlist anthology and in December there&#8217;ll be a steampunk anthology with all new short stories. You can also read many of the novels in serial instalments free on their site.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.cherryh.com/WaveWithoutAShore/" rel="nofollow">Wave without a Shore</a>, where C.J. Cherryh, Jane Fancher and Lynn Abbey are working on their own ebook press for their backlist. Haven&#8217;t opened yet though.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.inkalicious.com/inkstore.php" rel="nofollow">Inkalicious where Michele Jerott Albert</a> is selling five of her out-of-print romance suspense novels as ebooks and you get the first one completely free (which is why I discovered her).</p>
<p>All these ebooks are drm-free. All great value for the money spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Connolly</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/11/18/malle-vallik-harlequins-digital-director-answers-questions-on-harlequin-horizons/#comment-223349</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=15321#comment-223349</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d have loved to have been a fly-on-the-wall at the HQN meetings where HH was discussed. Here’s my guess, though. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think it was discussed at Harlequin at all. I think Torstar did a study - where can we squeeze more milk out of the cash cow, the only subsidiary we have that is doing well - and they came up with Carina and HQN Ho. (HH is Harlequin Historicals, not Horizon). 
They got the marketing people and accountants and financiers onboard, then they told the editing staff. By then it was a done deal and no amount of &quot;it won&#039;t work that way&quot; was going to work. You took it or you left. Period.
This reeks of top-down, of a &quot;study&quot; maybe done by a management consultancy. It sometimes stinks to be a management consultant. You&#039;re suggestion is supposed to be a starting point, then the company you did the study for takes it and runs with it, instead of doing more specific studies and consulting the people who work in the area. 
Just like HQN did with Ho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’d have loved to have been a fly-on-the-wall at the HQN meetings where HH was discussed. Here’s my guess, though. </p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it was discussed at Harlequin at all. I think Torstar did a study &#8211; where can we squeeze more milk out of the cash cow, the only subsidiary we have that is doing well &#8211; and they came up with Carina and HQN Ho. (HH is Harlequin Historicals, not Horizon).<br />
They got the marketing people and accountants and financiers onboard, then they told the editing staff. By then it was a done deal and no amount of &#8220;it won&#8217;t work that way&#8221; was going to work. You took it or you left. Period.<br />
This reeks of top-down, of a &#8220;study&#8221; maybe done by a management consultancy. It sometimes stinks to be a management consultant. You&#8217;re suggestion is supposed to be a starting point, then the company you did the study for takes it and runs with it, instead of doing more specific studies and consulting the people who work in the area.<br />
Just like HQN did with Ho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
