Gawker noticed a legitimate ad on Craigslist seeking 14 people to forge the autographs of a two person bestselling writing team.
Requirements: You must be able to demonstrate your ability to precisely copy the authors’ signatures.
I’m sure that there are few people in prison who could help you out on that and you’d only have to pay them $0.40 per day. I can’t decide if the authors are that horribly lazy. Whether the publisher is opening itself up to legal ramifications from paying people to learn to forge other’s signatures. Or whether the authors hate their readers so much that they can’t bear to be within a table’s width of them. Or whether that many people really, really want a signed book that in order to save the authors’ from repetitive stress injury, these ghost signers are necessary.
Via the Guardian.
Loading ...
Open Threads at Dear Author. Want to know what new releases are out this month and what readers are excited about reading? Check out the threads below. 
We don’t like to censor comments nor do we endorse the comments of any poster. We do reserve the right to moderate comments but most of the time will not, believing, as Justice Brandeis did, that the greater good is in “more speech, not enforced silence.”
I am not sure that wielding a digipan or stamp is really akin to forging. The use of these devices is already pretty commonplace and has little to do with personalised ‘appearance’ signings.
I’m wondering whether the publisher is doing some sort of promotion and needs thousands of signed books? One year when I chaired an SF convention, I had to sign about three books of checks all at once, so the artists from the art show could be paid. That one evening changed my signature forever, even aside from the horribly painful hand and wrist I had to deal with afterward. And that wasn’t really all that many signatures, relatively speaking. :/
Angie
Aye, if they’re going to resort to having someone else sign autographs for them the least they could do is be less tacky and not advertise the fact
I would like to see the ad that has sold/is going to sell these books. Cannot say signed by the author. Might just be going to get an autographed sticker but there’s an air of fraud about this. If nothing else they are defrauding people who are their biggest fans.
There’s a current trend in collecting to preferring books with personalized inscriptions– “To Michael”, rather than just the name and date, whereas the name and date books used to command higher prices.
If this is a common practice in the industry (even if they don’t advertise on CL)then I can see why this shift has occurred.
Heavens, lets go the whole Heinlein way and hire doubles to appear for the authors at book signings.
Reads almost like a sting for paperhangers.
When I saw William Gibson at the Philly public library, for non-personalized autographs, he only allowed one book. For personalized autographs, you can bring as many as you wanted. I see this as a workable solution for both authors and collectors.
This doesn’t surprise me that much. Autographs are always more valuable if you have a picture of the object being signed, particularly if by a celebrity or similar. Many signatures are done by stamps, secretaries, and other similar strategies.