<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publisher Alert:  New Concepts Publishing Releasing Unauthorized Material</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/06/25/publisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pam Payne</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-166586</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-166586</guid>
		<description>I'm confused. Did she actually sign a contract with NCP, or did they just take her submission and use it without her permission as the foundation for an anthology? I've heard of this happening with other epubs. Either way, it's totally outrageous for them to even consider doing something like this. It's unethical business practices at their very lowest. Can RWA do something to help shut this publisher down?

And Nora, to answer your question about agents and epubs, some agents do take on e-published writers, but not many. You have to have a really good track record before they'll sign you. I've tried to get an agent and though I've come close, it's like the print pubs--really like the book, don't want to take it on... Maybe once my book comes out, if the sales are good, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. Did she actually sign a contract with NCP, or did they just take her submission and use it without her permission as the foundation for an anthology? I&#8217;ve heard of this happening with other epubs. Either way, it&#8217;s totally outrageous for them to even consider doing something like this. It&#8217;s unethical business practices at their very lowest. Can RWA do something to help shut this publisher down?</p>
<p>And Nora, to answer your question about agents and epubs, some agents do take on e-published writers, but not many. You have to have a really good track record before they&#8217;ll sign you. I&#8217;ve tried to get an agent and though I&#8217;ve come close, it&#8217;s like the print pubs&#8211;really like the book, don&#8217;t want to take it on&#8230; Maybe once my book comes out, if the sales are good, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Wright</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-166573</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-166573</guid>
		<description>My gut feeling is this: when you sign a contract, know what/who you're getting into. Period.  I don't care if you're self pubbing, just know it up front.  Second, I tend to believe the writers in this case and I'll tell you why.  I see the public notice, whether legal or not, as a way of saying to their authors, "This is what happens when you mess with us." US of course, being this publisher.  Third, and I promise to stop after this: Regardless of legal or not, to put that notice out there should warn other authors to beward.  Oh, and btw, I checked P&#38;E and they were only listed as a publisher, no other info.  HOWEVER YOU MAY FIND THIS INTERESTING, or you may already know.  P&#38;E is being sued.  They didn't say by whom, only that they are collecting money to mount their defense.  All in all, this is extremly intersting info for my day off!  I appreciate all the comments and have vowed to return to this blog a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My gut feeling is this: when you sign a contract, know what/who you&#8217;re getting into. Period.  I don&#8217;t care if you&#8217;re self pubbing, just know it up front.  Second, I tend to believe the writers in this case and I&#8217;ll tell you why.  I see the public notice, whether legal or not, as a way of saying to their authors, &#8220;This is what happens when you mess with us.&#8221; US of course, being this publisher.  Third, and I promise to stop after this: Regardless of legal or not, to put that notice out there should warn other authors to beward.  Oh, and btw, I checked P&amp;E and they were only listed as a publisher, no other info.  HOWEVER YOU MAY FIND THIS INTERESTING, or you may already know.  P&amp;E is being sued.  They didn&#8217;t say by whom, only that they are collecting money to mount their defense.  All in all, this is extremly intersting info for my day off!  I appreciate all the comments and have vowed to return to this blog a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonquil</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-166275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonquil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-166275</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;First Warranties is misspelled.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;This&lt;/i&gt;, right here, demonstrates why you can't trust yourself to read legal prose.

"Warrantees" is a legal "term of art".  IANAL, but the meaning is something in the neighborhood of "promises" or "guarantees"* .  "Warranties" is not the same word, and therefore doesn't have the same meaning in a contract.

I'm not picking on the original poster, so much as showing why a writer really, really doesn't have enough background information to interpret a contract correctly.

* I just looked it up, and I was SO wrong. "A warrantee (accent on last syllable) is a person or party who is guaranteed something. "  Which is why I can't be trusted to read this, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>First Warranties is misspelled.</i></p>
<p><i>This</i>, right here, demonstrates why you can&#8217;t trust yourself to read legal prose.</p>
<p>&#8220;Warrantees&#8221; is a legal &#8220;term of art&#8221;.  IANAL, but the meaning is something in the neighborhood of &#8220;promises&#8221; or &#8220;guarantees&#8221;* .  &#8220;Warranties&#8221; is not the same word, and therefore doesn&#8217;t have the same meaning in a contract.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not picking on the original poster, so much as showing why a writer really, really doesn&#8217;t have enough background information to interpret a contract correctly.</p>
<p>* I just looked it up, and I was SO wrong. &#8220;A warrantee (accent on last syllable) is a person or party who is guaranteed something. &#8221;  Which is why I can&#8217;t be trusted to read this, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heeding the Warning Signals in ePublishing &#124; Dear Author: Romance Book Reviews, Author Interviews, and Commentary</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-165950</link>
		<dc:creator>Heeding the Warning Signals in ePublishing &#124; Dear Author: Romance Book Reviews, Author Interviews, and Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165950</guid>
		<description>[...] light of the recent occurrences at NCP in which the publisher took a partial from an author and inserted it into an anthology without her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] light of the recent occurrences at NCP in which the publisher took a partial from an author and inserted it into an anthology without her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaoscat aka Samantha Storm</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-165921</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaoscat aka Samantha Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165921</guid>
		<description>I guess my comment would be yes it might be legal but have you seen any other publishing houses do it? No because they respect the privacy of their authors. And if NCP is going to do this in future what author is going to want to submit to a house which at some point will make their private names public. And even if you don’t terminate your contract when it’s up, the management can decide to make you one of the last chance books and terminate the contract for you. So right now every author in the NCP stable has the possibility of having their real name come out publically. Some of these authors may have morality clauses in their jobs. They may have been keeping the fact they are writing erotica from their family or maybe they live in a small town.

It’s another example of NCP making a vindictive move that damages their authors and their own house.

Chaoscat AKA Samahtha Storm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my comment would be yes it might be legal but have you seen any other publishing houses do it? No because they respect the privacy of their authors. And if NCP is going to do this in future what author is going to want to submit to a house which at some point will make their private names public. And even if you don’t terminate your contract when it’s up, the management can decide to make you one of the last chance books and terminate the contract for you. So right now every author in the NCP stable has the possibility of having their real name come out publically. Some of these authors may have morality clauses in their jobs. They may have been keeping the fact they are writing erotica from their family or maybe they live in a small town.</p>
<p>It’s another example of NCP making a vindictive move that damages their authors and their own house.</p>
<p>Chaoscat AKA Samahtha Storm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Rainey</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-165914</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Rainey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165914</guid>
		<description>I usually don't comment on publishers behaving badly. Mostly because someone else says about the same thing I'm thinking so my comment becomes redundant, but I do want to address the 'why don't e-authors have agents' issue. It's SOOOO not a simple matter to find representation as an ebook author. I don't think it's a case of authors not bothering to find an agent so much as finding an agent willing to take a chance on a new author. 

However, having someone look over your contract before you sign is mega important. I think one mistake a newbie makes is thinking that they don't want to rock the boat. In my experience, most reputable publishers are more than willing to answer contract questions and work with the author. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually don&#8217;t comment on publishers behaving badly. Mostly because someone else says about the same thing I&#8217;m thinking so my comment becomes redundant, but I do want to address the &#8216;why don&#8217;t e-authors have agents&#8217; issue. It&#8217;s SOOOO not a simple matter to find representation as an ebook author. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a case of authors not bothering to find an agent so much as finding an agent willing to take a chance on a new author. </p>
<p>However, having someone look over your contract before you sign is mega important. I think one mistake a newbie makes is thinking that they don&#8217;t want to rock the boat. In my experience, most reputable publishers are more than willing to answer contract questions and work with the author. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poppi Flowers</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-4/#comment-165912</link>
		<dc:creator>Poppi Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165912</guid>
		<description>I don't know about your contracts or the NCP contracts but mine says if I contract a book with my NY pub and I don't finish that book on time or to their satisfaction, it can be taken from me and finished by a 'staff' writer and released without my name attached.

I get the feeling that was the case with the supposed release of unauthorized material. If you contracted the book, in my opinion that makes it authorized and my IP lawyer brother-in-law agrees. 

And this was on the NCP authors' list this morning..............


Ok, this was posted at my rwa group and this writer talked to the lawyers she worked with. This is what they said  ****

Showed the New Concepts "PUBLIC NOTICES" to a publishing attorney in my
office - it is just a legal formality, and done in other arenas
(although he said he hasn't seen it used in publishing before, but said
it would actually be a good idea to avoid confusion about who is holding
the rights on the properties in question). For the purposes (most
likely, he says, since he has no knowledge of New Concepts) of
clarifying for public information who the rights holders in these
properties now are and they they no longer have anything to do with the
stuff. It is not to inform the authors - it is to inform the public.

My take may be that they also want to divest themselves of any
responsibility should a third party suddenly start selling or excerpting
the works somehow.

Not an attempt to embarrass, really. And they have to use the names and
pseudonyms to avoid confusion over the same or similar titled books by
different authors.

And those instances in which the author has been accused or deemed to
have breached their contract and the notice indicates that the publisher
will attempt to recoup costs by not paying royalties, the publisher (if
they can prove breach) can recoup costs incurred if they so choose. If
it had been a traditional paper publisher, they could have demanded
their advance back, for example.

Not playing Devil's advocate here, since I don't really know anything
about the New Concepts issues. Just throwing in my legal 2 cents since
I can't swing a dead cat without hitting an IP lawyer here ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about your contracts or the NCP contracts but mine says if I contract a book with my NY pub and I don&#8217;t finish that book on time or to their satisfaction, it can be taken from me and finished by a &#8217;staff&#8217; writer and released without my name attached.</p>
<p>I get the feeling that was the case with the supposed release of unauthorized material. If you contracted the book, in my opinion that makes it authorized and my IP lawyer brother-in-law agrees. </p>
<p>And this was on the NCP authors&#8217; list this morning&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Ok, this was posted at my rwa group and this writer talked to the lawyers she worked with. This is what they said  ****</p>
<p>Showed the New Concepts &#8220;PUBLIC NOTICES&#8221; to a publishing attorney in my<br />
office - it is just a legal formality, and done in other arenas<br />
(although he said he hasn&#8217;t seen it used in publishing before, but said<br />
it would actually be a good idea to avoid confusion about who is holding<br />
the rights on the properties in question). For the purposes (most<br />
likely, he says, since he has no knowledge of New Concepts) of<br />
clarifying for public information who the rights holders in these<br />
properties now are and they they no longer have anything to do with the<br />
stuff. It is not to inform the authors - it is to inform the public.</p>
<p>My take may be that they also want to divest themselves of any<br />
responsibility should a third party suddenly start selling or excerpting<br />
the works somehow.</p>
<p>Not an attempt to embarrass, really. And they have to use the names and<br />
pseudonyms to avoid confusion over the same or similar titled books by<br />
different authors.</p>
<p>And those instances in which the author has been accused or deemed to<br />
have breached their contract and the notice indicates that the publisher<br />
will attempt to recoup costs by not paying royalties, the publisher (if<br />
they can prove breach) can recoup costs incurred if they so choose. If<br />
it had been a traditional paper publisher, they could have demanded<br />
their advance back, for example.</p>
<p>Not playing Devil&#8217;s advocate here, since I don&#8217;t really know anything<br />
about the New Concepts issues. Just throwing in my legal 2 cents since<br />
I can&#8217;t swing a dead cat without hitting an IP lawyer here &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-3/#comment-165894</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165894</guid>
		<description>I agree, Kirsten. I would definitely do that kind of checking, too. But even if a small press or epub comes off as reasonably professional online, they still need to have their financial and legal house in order to be a viable business. The one small press I mentioned had a lot of "rah, rah" online, and you'd have to go far and wide to hear a negative word about them.

But I would never have sent anything to them because I could find no evidence they'd set up a business with a decent chance of making it. If there's no record that the publisher is incorporated to do business and has a federal tax ID to use for paying authors, people should run the hell away, no matter how many good things are said about the publisher on blogs and message boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Kirsten. I would definitely do that kind of checking, too. But even if a small press or epub comes off as reasonably professional online, they still need to have their financial and legal house in order to be a viable business. The one small press I mentioned had a lot of &#8220;rah, rah&#8221; online, and you&#8217;d have to go far and wide to hear a negative word about them.</p>
<p>But I would never have sent anything to them because I could find no evidence they&#8217;d set up a business with a decent chance of making it. If there&#8217;s no record that the publisher is incorporated to do business and has a federal tax ID to use for paying authors, people should run the hell away, no matter how many good things are said about the publisher on blogs and message boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirsten saell</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-3/#comment-165886</link>
		<dc:creator>kirsten saell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 06:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165886</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think authors should also do a quick background check on a company before signing a contract. Heck, I do it before I even submit anything, but I’m paranoid like that. :-)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

More than a quick one. I researched epublishers for months, pored over booklists and author websites and FAQs and submission guidelines, bought books so I could see the quality of their editing, googled like a madman trying to nose out every little speck of dirt I could regarding their level of professionalism in public, whether there were complaints from authors or customers. In the end, it came down to four I was willing to try. Samhain was my #1 and I feel very lucky to have them. Luckier still, whenever I read something like this comment thread. Holy crapweasels, who the fuck does Ms. De Pasture think she is?

Oh wait, she's Desiree Acuna. I bought one of her books--it was the second ebook I ever read. When I finished it (oh, why did I bother finishing it?) I decided then and there that I wouldn't be submitting my work to NCP--and that was before I realized Ms. Acuna and Ms. De Pasture were one and the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think authors should also do a quick background check on a company before signing a contract. Heck, I do it before I even submit anything, but I’m paranoid like that. :-)</p></blockquote>
<p>More than a quick one. I researched epublishers for months, pored over booklists and author websites and FAQs and submission guidelines, bought books so I could see the quality of their editing, googled like a madman trying to nose out every little speck of dirt I could regarding their level of professionalism in public, whether there were complaints from authors or customers. In the end, it came down to four I was willing to try. Samhain was my #1 and I feel very lucky to have them. Luckier still, whenever I read something like this comment thread. Holy crapweasels, who the fuck does Ms. De Pasture think she is?</p>
<p>Oh wait, she&#8217;s Desiree Acuna. I bought one of her books&#8211;it was the second ebook I ever read. When I finished it (oh, why did I bother finishing it?) I decided then and there that I wouldn&#8217;t be submitting my work to NCP&#8211;and that was before I realized Ms. Acuna and Ms. De Pasture were one and the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelli Stevens</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F06%2F25%2Fpublisher-alert-new-concepts-publishing-releasing-unauthorized-material%2F&amp;seed_title=Publisher+Alert%3A++New+Concepts+Publishing+Releasing+Unauthorized+Material/comment-page-3/#comment-165880</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelli Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/?p=5077#comment-165880</guid>
		<description>This is scary and sad! And some scary stuff in the comments I'm seeing.

I have an agent (after just selling to NY), but our agreement is I'll handle my own epub stuff with the two epubs I'm currently with (who I trust/have a relationship with). If I sell to an epub with some heavy contract stuff then she'll step in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is scary and sad! And some scary stuff in the comments I&#8217;m seeing.</p>
<p>I have an agent (after just selling to NY), but our agreement is I&#8217;ll handle my own epub stuff with the two epubs I&#8217;m currently with (who I trust/have a relationship with). If I sell to an epub with some heavy contract stuff then she&#8217;ll step in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
