Comments on: REVIEW: A Most Unconventional Match by Julia Justiss

By: azteclady

azteclady — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:42:50 +0000

My covetous soul thanks you, my pocket cries and whimpers.

By: Jayne

Jayne — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:17:20 +0000

Even though Harlequin lists it as a July release, it’s already in stock at Amazon or available as an ebook for download now from eharlequin. I love immediate gratifitation.

By: azteclady

azteclady — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:08:02 +0000

I want this book, and your review makes me want it even more, Jayne.

By: kristenmary

kristenmary — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:37:13 +0000

I’m all for that Jane. I’ve been reading nothing but historicals lately. I’m going through Loretta Chase’s backlist now. This one looks pretty good. I’ll add it to the list.

By: Jane

Jane — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:03:44 +0000

I think we should have a Tuesday in which we can only comment in Regency-speak, including insults.

By: Jayne

Jayne — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:58:43 +0000

Oh yes, I’d forgotten that reference! The next time some asshole cuts me off in traffic, I can yell this.

By: Robin

Robin — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:55:37 +0000

Well, according to the Regency Lexicon, “bacon-brained” would be appropriate.

By: Marianne McA

Marianne McA — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:53:04 +0000

Wanker?

Too recent a term.

Remembering my Heyer, how about ‘nodcock’?

By: Jane

Jane — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:50:06 +0000

Wanker?

By: Jayne

Jayne — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:39:54 +0000

Hmmm, I wonder what slang term Regency era people would have used in place of putz? Anybody know? Guesses?