Comments on: $200 E Ink Ebook Reader at IDPF Conference

By: Beth aka Scifibookcat

Beth aka Scifibookcat — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:05:50 +0000

MS Reader capability is a must for me, too. More than 90% of my approx 400 ebooks are .lit files. When I first made the jump to ebooks last July, I researched all of the formats that were readable on a PC (I read on my laptop) and I liked the appearance and features of MS Reader the best by far. I’d love to have something more portable to read on, but not enough to spend $300 unless it does a lot more than carry books.

By: Walt

Walt — Fri, 16 May 2008 05:08:22 +0000

BTW, the paparazzi snapped a pic of Jennifer Aniston relaxing in a bathing suit. What do the geek websites focus on? She was using a Kindle.

By: BevQB

BevQB — Thu, 15 May 2008 22:03:35 +0000

Ah, okay Angela, I understand what you meant now. However, if the Windows CE based versions DO have LIT, then I would view it as a definite advantage over the dedicated readers.

In fact, the more I think about it, if, other than the screen difference that Jane pointed out, these devices function basically as a UMPC, I just might be able to live with needing a booklight. Every single problem I have ever had with any of my PDAs involved connecting/synching them to a PC. So, a low priced device that would allow direct download (assuming I can also load MSReader), is sounding VERY attractive to me.

By: Angela James

Angela James — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:42:17 +0000

I understand what you’re saying, Bev, but my point is that there currently isn’t any dedicated reader that uses LIT, so this particular reader doesn’t have a “deficit” that any other dedicated reader doesn’t also have. So I don’t think its lack of use of the LIT format will work against it any more than it does any reader. In other words, equal playing field.

By: Shannon Stacey

Shannon Stacey — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:42:15 +0000

Never say never, but I’m extremely unlikely to ever buy an ebook reader that doesn’t read .prc because, after test driving several formats, that’s by far my favorite.

And I’ve had two different handhelds—the iPaq and the Palm—and could never get PDF to work properly on either, so I’m PDF shy. For somebody like me, who doesn’t have the technical know-how to “crack” a book, that would be a dealbreaker.

I also wouldn’t spend more than fifty bucks on any reader that isn’t backlit, but that might just be me.

By: Jane

Jane — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:10:17 +0000

No, these devices would not be backlit because e-ink technology does not allow for a back light. You’d have to get a book light.

The difference would be in the screen. The eink screen is flat in its visual aspect and does not flicker (except when you turn the page).

By: BevQB

BevQB — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:05:33 +0000

Angela, unless someone comes up with something better, I will never, ever buy an eReader that doesn’t let me use MSReader (lit) (I’m assuming the Windows CE Astak devices will allow download of MSReader). For one, I prefer the navigation in Reader, I like the bookmarks, I like how it keeps track of what pages I’ve read, and I REALLY love the “sticky notes”. Secondly, it’s a Microsoft product, so I’m pretty sure it has a better chance of being around 5 years from now than the Sony or Kindle formats do.

Jane, maybe I’m missing it, but do you know if these Astak devices are backlit? Honestly, I really wouldn’t have much use for a device that I couldn’t read in the dark.

The fact that Windows CE is available as an OS makes me think of them as more of a UMPC, but since they don’t refer to them that way, and the fact that the price is so low, has me wondering what the difference is between these devices and a Windows Mobile PDA or a Windows based UMPC.

By: Jane

Jane — Thu, 15 May 2008 20:20:03 +0000

Xandra – I am guessing cost. Linux is free and the Windows CE probably has a licensing cost. Maybe the size of the 5″ doesn’t allow for the hardware of a wifi/bluetooth (although I doubt it).

By: Angela James

Angela James — Thu, 15 May 2008 20:15:20 +0000

Some may not want to be forced to convert their purchased books into a TXT, PDF, RTF, HTML/CHM format so they can read them. In other words, ripping the copyright protection via a program of dubious legality (”crack”).

Although, a lot of people with readers currently do this anyway (for instance, people who own an Ebookwise).

If Sony can attract readers using the PDF format, I would think this reader could do similar, especially if it supports a straight RTF/HTML format with no conversion. But maybe I’m unique in not seeing the lack of LIT/PRC support as a drawback. Why do you think it would be, Walt?

By: XandraG

XandraG — Thu, 15 May 2008 20:12:54 +0000

I’d be interested to know why the 5″ comes with a Linux base, but the 6 and 9 come with WinCE–what motivated their design choices and the like. Also, why .PNG images don’t seem bo have support. And why the 5″ doesn’t have a wifi option. Just curious on the diff between the 5″ and the 6″ not seeming all that different, yet vastly different with their choices.