Literary Segregation or Market Specialization?

Borders, who financially might be on its last legs, is not going down without a fight. It opened a new store a few weeks ago and is now launching a new Latina book club (does the Latina instead Latino mean that the book club is just for women?)

Does this mean that there will be a Latina section in the Borders store like there is an African American section? Are Latina authors happy about the specialized market segmentation? Will Julie Leto’s great “Dirty” series be reprinted to be sold to the new Latina book club? So many questions.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • co.mments
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • SphereIt
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Blogsvine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Mixx
  • Sphinn
JaneJane is a long time romance reader whose passion is, you guessed it, reading. She's currently loving contemporary authors like Sarah Mayberry and Kristan Higgins but her first love will always be the historical. Some of her old time favorites are Amanda Quick and Johanna Lindsey and some of the new favorites are Sherry Thomas, Joanna Bourne and Claudia Dain. Email this author | All posts by Jane

3 comments to “Literary Segregation or Market Specialization?”

  1. 1

    For those involved in the RWA, the most recent Romance Writers Reports had an interesting article about the segregation of fiction. It’s worth a read if you can get your hands on a copy.

    Working in library services, I know of several large libraries nationwide that separate African American fiction from general fiction, so it’s not just booksellers that are doing this.

  2. 2

    I work in libraries too, and at a recent workshop we had a discussion about this topic. We don’t separate based on race at our library, but apparently many libraries do feel pressure from their patrons to do just that. I understand the desire to find items that are of interest quickly and easily, but I think segregating books based on race is a step in the wrong direction. I would fight very strongly against doing it in our library. One of our core goals (as a library) is to help people broaden their horizons. That can’t be done if we separate books out for such politically or socially expedient reasons.

  3. 3

    Warner tried a “Latina/Chicana” imprint a while back and it failed. The trouble I have with this is that “Latina” isn’t as concrete a label as “African-American” because “Latino/as” can come in all sort of shapes, shades and backgrounds, and popular American culture only associates that label with brown people. Not to mention the fact that many Latin American cultures have many more labels for the different ethnicities they possess within their culture, and American labeling is confining, restrictive and ignorant. Would a White Columbian, Japanese Brazilian, and Afro-Cuban be included in this book club, or any section of a book store or imprint publishers try to create? Or will they continue to associate Latina with Mexican or Puerto Rican women?

Say What's On Your mind

Subscribe without commenting