Comments on: REVIEW: A Rake’s Guide to Seduction by Caroline Linden

By: June Recommended Reads | Dear Author: Romance Novel Reviews, Industry News, and Commentary

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:59:30 +0000

[...] and specific for that time frame — or why bother to set it then — then let it happen. Read more here. Jane would also recommend this [...]

By: GrowlyCub

GrowlyCub — Fri, 09 May 2008 22:40:37 +0000

Jayne, I’ve posted my review at http://growlycub.livejournal.com and invite comments, if anybody is so inclined.

Thanks again for sending me the ARC. I really enjoyed reading the book.

By: Kimbelina

Kimbelina — Fri, 09 May 2008 02:32:39 +0000

Happy to sign up for a second chance! Thanks!

By: AndreaS

AndreaS — Thu, 08 May 2008 18:30:16 +0000

oh man. I was so behind but thankfully I did not miss it completely!

I am a big fan of slow developments. And this one sounds wonderful. I’m always in favor of the silly heroine finding her sense (or just growing up a bit).

My TBR pile just keeps growing!

By: Sandy (strlady)

Sandy (strlady) — Wed, 07 May 2008 22:20:45 +0000

I missed this one before but not again!!

By: Dear Author Giveaway You Won’t Want to Miss | Dear Author: Romance Book Reviews, Author Interviews, and Commentary

Wed, 07 May 2008 18:58:20 +0000

[...] remind the readers that there were two outstanding Caroline Linden ARC’s for her June book, A Rake’s Guide to Seduction. Two readers didn’t come forward so I am re-opening the opportunity. Caroline Linden writes [...]

By: limecello

limecello — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:52:19 +0000

Oh, sad, I don’t know how I missed this – but I will add the book to my list!

By: Winners of the Caroline Linden ARC Giveaway | Dear Author: Romance Book Reviews, Author Interviews, and Commentary

Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:24 +0000

[...] You are getting an early peek at Caroline Linden’s lovely June historical, A Rake’s Guide to Seduction. Please send us your snail mail address within the next 48 hours. [...]

By: Amy S.

Amy S. — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:00:20 +0000

Sounds great!

By: Caffey

Caffey — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:11:02 +0000

Would be a joy to read and review this on my blog and Amazon. I’ve been so looking forward to this release. I love re-united stories, where they come back together, and thats what this one sounds like. A regency! They can be great comfort reads. Enjoyed reading your review.

By: Laela

Laela — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:15:45 +0000

I loved Linden’s What a Gentleman Wants, although a bit indifferent about her last book. I am looking forward to this new book to see if she can bounce back. Count me in for this contest!

By: sistergolden

sistergolden — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:17:03 +0000

I’m interested in trying this author (new to me) –please sign me up for the contest!

By: Dani

Dani — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:50:35 +0000

Me too please!

By: Jody W.

Jody W. — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:24:48 +0000

Count me in! I like Regencies and would be willing to post a review/reaction to the ARC somewhere public.

By: senetra

senetra — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:38:17 +0000

I read one of the books in the series, but didn’t like it that much. The review interested me enough to get the other book and the one reviewed.

By: Nohely

Nohely — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:57:11 +0000

I’m intrigued by this book. This might be the cure to my Regency blues, since the last one I read left me flat.

By: CrystalGB

CrystalGB — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:39:02 +0000

This book sounds great. I would love to read it.

By: Gladys Paradowski

Gladys Paradowski — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:57:44 +0000

I just finished reading a romance book that had so much “excess baggage” that I kept thinking about skipping much of it. I definitely agree that just sticking to the love plot makes a book more readable and far more interesting.

By: Jess

Jess — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:08:17 +0000

I have enjoyed the previous Linden books and have been waiting for this new one with Celia. After reading the review (skimming, actually, to not find out too much), I can’t wait for June.

By: Jayne

Jayne — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:12:38 +0000

Mary, I think it stands just fine on its own.