<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romance&#8217;s Trivialization of Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:36:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-3/#comment-192076</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-192076</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-192045&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Davia&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;ve never heard of it, but we have reviewed a book from Lethe publishers before.  Dr. S reads much of our m/m romance.  I&#039;ll have to check with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-192045" rel="nofollow">Davia</a> I&#8217;ve never heard of it, but we have reviewed a book from Lethe publishers before.  Dr. S reads much of our m/m romance.  I&#8217;ll have to check with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davia</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-3/#comment-192045</link>
		<dc:creator>Davia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-192045</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post and so true. I stopped reading romance, for the most part, because it seemed there wasn&#039;t much to what put out today besides grunts and thrusts and boiling love juices. Ugh. Then I was given a m/m romance for my birthday last week and, honestly, I started it with reluctance. But it started out with a two young boy in poverty and an abusive home in late Victorian London and before it&#039;s over with there is murder, vengeance, insanity and cruel choices. Beautifully written and vivid to the point of pain, I was hooked and read the darn thing in two days, and it&#039;s not a short book. The title is The Phoenix and the author is Ruth Sims, put out by a press I never heard of, Lethe. Maybe it&#039;s self-published, I don&#039;t know. I just know it&#039;s an A#1 story and I&#039;ve looked in vain for something else by the author. I&#039;ve also hunted DA for a review of it. Can&#039;t believe a great review site like this one has missed such a terrific read. Will you be reviewing it???

Anyway, I love books like this that really have something to say and say it well. I have to read older books to find what I really want. There aren&#039;t enough new writers doing it. I want flesh on my literary bones!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post and so true. I stopped reading romance, for the most part, because it seemed there wasn&#8217;t much to what put out today besides grunts and thrusts and boiling love juices. Ugh. Then I was given a m/m romance for my birthday last week and, honestly, I started it with reluctance. But it started out with a two young boy in poverty and an abusive home in late Victorian London and before it&#8217;s over with there is murder, vengeance, insanity and cruel choices. Beautifully written and vivid to the point of pain, I was hooked and read the darn thing in two days, and it&#8217;s not a short book. The title is The Phoenix and the author is Ruth Sims, put out by a press I never heard of, Lethe. Maybe it&#8217;s self-published, I don&#8217;t know. I just know it&#8217;s an A#1 story and I&#8217;ve looked in vain for something else by the author. I&#8217;ve also hunted DA for a review of it. Can&#8217;t believe a great review site like this one has missed such a terrific read. Will you be reviewing it???</p>
<p>Anyway, I love books like this that really have something to say and say it well. I have to read older books to find what I really want. There aren&#8217;t enough new writers doing it. I want flesh on my literary bones!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seriously Romantic&#8230;or Not &#171; Jenyfer Matthews</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-3/#comment-163250</link>
		<dc:creator>Seriously Romantic&#8230;or Not &#171; Jenyfer Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 12:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-163250</guid>
		<description>[...] Romantic&#8230;or&#160;Not  Last week Dear Author posted a blog topic that got me to thinking. Basically Jane was wondering why it was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Romantic&#8230;or&nbsp;Not  Last week Dear Author posted a blog topic that got me to thinking. Basically Jane was wondering why it was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Romance Genre &#38; Serious Issues &#124; Literary Escapism</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-161391</link>
		<dc:creator>The Romance Genre &#38; Serious Issues &#124; Literary Escapism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-161391</guid>
		<description>[...] was reading the Dear Author site and one of the Janes posted an editorial on how the romance genre trivializes certain serious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reading the Dear Author site and one of the Janes posted an editorial on how the romance genre trivializes certain serious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev(BB)</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-156837</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev(BB)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-156837</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Isn´t that tragic?
Well, to those who hear it, it is, to me it´s my life.
Which brings me to another version of poorly handled issues.
Writing it to death. I´ve been told I´m not normal by several people, they can´t seem to understand that you don´t nessecarily need to have severe problems, just because you´re life wasn´t all fun.
That´s called pop-psychology and sadly that is all, many authors rely upon. 

I think that is, what Nora calls a book evolving solely around the issue.
Oh, misery, oh misery, oh woe is me, oh misery.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was thinking about this point the other day when this topic was hot and then I had to go to the doctor and it sort of slipped away into the ether. I think it&#039;s largely a matter of perception and point of view. 

What one person may see as an issue, another may simply see as a normal part of their life. This is probably especially true when we&#039;re talking about various disabilities. Once someone enters a more advanced stages of coping with what&#039;s going on in their life it isn&#039;t an &quot;issue&quot; but simply who they are and yet to a reader it might seem like an author skimmed over important aspects of the story if those elements weren&#039;t given more importance. The author may actually be writing realistically and be penalized for it by some readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Isn´t that tragic?<br />
Well, to those who hear it, it is, to me it´s my life.<br />
Which brings me to another version of poorly handled issues.<br />
Writing it to death. I´ve been told I´m not normal by several people, they can´t seem to understand that you don´t nessecarily need to have severe problems, just because you´re life wasn´t all fun.<br />
That´s called pop-psychology and sadly that is all, many authors rely upon. </p>
<p>I think that is, what Nora calls a book evolving solely around the issue.<br />
Oh, misery, oh misery, oh woe is me, oh misery.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was thinking about this point the other day when this topic was hot and then I had to go to the doctor and it sort of slipped away into the ether. I think it&#8217;s largely a matter of perception and point of view. </p>
<p>What one person may see as an issue, another may simply see as a normal part of their life. This is probably especially true when we&#8217;re talking about various disabilities. Once someone enters a more advanced stages of coping with what&#8217;s going on in their life it isn&#8217;t an &#8220;issue&#8221; but simply who they are and yet to a reader it might seem like an author skimmed over important aspects of the story if those elements weren&#8217;t given more importance. The author may actually be writing realistically and be penalized for it by some readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissKitty</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-156826</link>
		<dc:creator>MissKitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-156826</guid>
		<description>Issues and Romance....
First of all, Romance is ALL about issues. C´mon, what fun is a book, where Hero and Heroine fall in love and then... yes.. well.... have sex.
What we call issues here, is usually called plot. And no matter how much I hate to admit that, some romances seriously lack this.

I´m German, English is not my native language. I started to write Romance, after reading a book, where the heroine beheads her (evil) mother and then shrugs it off with the words &quot;It´s sad, I loved her, but she was evil&quot;
HELLOOOOO?!
That was the point, where I decided, that if this kind of crap gets published, I can make it as well.

So, Romance evolves around two people, dealing with their issues ( no matter how serious they are) and find their HEA.
But and this is the major But here, often times it´s handled poorly.
And that´s a shame. 
Many authors could do it so much better. 
Not all of us are a Joey W. Hill (who I admire deeply, just for that reason), but having a Heroine raped and then happily humping her way around some super dominant guy, isn´t something I want to read.
Unless of course, it´s explained in a plausible manner, e.g. as part of a deeper psychological issue and not just some sex for the sake of sex.

I love so called Issue Romance, perhaps I´m strange here.
I´ve had my life trashed by a severe case of Rheumatoid Arthritis at age 23, I met and fell in love with an Ex- Special forces Soldier who had and has PTSD and I woke up one night to find his arm around my neck. ( oh and for those who say this isn´t Romance material, we got together because of it, but that´s an entirely different story) He´s dominant, obnoxious and an idiot sometimes, short he´s male, yet I love him still, 7 years later and with love and a good amount of tears and work even managed to get the PTSD managed. 
As a child I lived alone for several years with a severely alcoholic mother and suffered through some heavy neglect.  
I know all about issues. *smirks*

Isn´t that tragic? 
Well, to those who hear it, it is, to me it´s my life.
Which brings me to another version of poorly handled issues.
Writing it to death. I´ve been told I´m not normal by several people, they can´t seem to understand that you don´t nessecarily need to have severe problems, just because you´re life wasn´t all fun. 
That´s called pop-psychology and sadly that is all, many authors rely upon. 

I think that is, what Nora calls a book evolving solely around the issue. 
Oh, misery, oh misery, oh woe is me, oh misery. 

Life is about growth and developement, and that´s what made humanity what it is today, the ability to adapt, given the rigth support. 
It´s not about wallowing in self-pity.
And honestly, isn´t that what romance is about, too?

Heroes and Heroines with issues are fine and great, nobody´s supposed to be perfect. And there are alot of them out there. 
It´s not a question if we need more issues in the romance genre, what we need, is authors who can handle them. And that is, what we lack. 

There are some gems out there and sadly alot of simple dust.
It´s pretty easy. If you introduce an issue take it serious, do some good and hard thinking how your Hero/Heroine copes and why. But please, please don´t over use it. 
That shouldn´t be too hard.


Post Scriptum: What is it about the Navy Seals? Well, Alpha males and Uniforms, do I need to say more? 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issues and Romance&#8230;.<br />
First of all, Romance is ALL about issues. C´mon, what fun is a book, where Hero and Heroine fall in love and then&#8230; yes.. well&#8230;. have sex.<br />
What we call issues here, is usually called plot. And no matter how much I hate to admit that, some romances seriously lack this.</p>
<p>I´m German, English is not my native language. I started to write Romance, after reading a book, where the heroine beheads her (evil) mother and then shrugs it off with the words &#8220;It´s sad, I loved her, but she was evil&#8221;<br />
HELLOOOOO?!<br />
That was the point, where I decided, that if this kind of crap gets published, I can make it as well.</p>
<p>So, Romance evolves around two people, dealing with their issues ( no matter how serious they are) and find their HEA.<br />
But and this is the major But here, often times it´s handled poorly.<br />
And that´s a shame.<br />
Many authors could do it so much better.<br />
Not all of us are a Joey W. Hill (who I admire deeply, just for that reason), but having a Heroine raped and then happily humping her way around some super dominant guy, isn´t something I want to read.<br />
Unless of course, it´s explained in a plausible manner, e.g. as part of a deeper psychological issue and not just some sex for the sake of sex.</p>
<p>I love so called Issue Romance, perhaps I´m strange here.<br />
I´ve had my life trashed by a severe case of Rheumatoid Arthritis at age 23, I met and fell in love with an Ex- Special forces Soldier who had and has PTSD and I woke up one night to find his arm around my neck. ( oh and for those who say this isn´t Romance material, we got together because of it, but that´s an entirely different story) He´s dominant, obnoxious and an idiot sometimes, short he´s male, yet I love him still, 7 years later and with love and a good amount of tears and work even managed to get the PTSD managed.<br />
As a child I lived alone for several years with a severely alcoholic mother and suffered through some heavy neglect.<br />
I know all about issues. *smirks*</p>
<p>Isn´t that tragic?<br />
Well, to those who hear it, it is, to me it´s my life.<br />
Which brings me to another version of poorly handled issues.<br />
Writing it to death. I´ve been told I´m not normal by several people, they can´t seem to understand that you don´t nessecarily need to have severe problems, just because you´re life wasn´t all fun.<br />
That´s called pop-psychology and sadly that is all, many authors rely upon. </p>
<p>I think that is, what Nora calls a book evolving solely around the issue.<br />
Oh, misery, oh misery, oh woe is me, oh misery. </p>
<p>Life is about growth and developement, and that´s what made humanity what it is today, the ability to adapt, given the rigth support.<br />
It´s not about wallowing in self-pity.<br />
And honestly, isn´t that what romance is about, too?</p>
<p>Heroes and Heroines with issues are fine and great, nobody´s supposed to be perfect. And there are alot of them out there.<br />
It´s not a question if we need more issues in the romance genre, what we need, is authors who can handle them. And that is, what we lack. </p>
<p>There are some gems out there and sadly alot of simple dust.<br />
It´s pretty easy. If you introduce an issue take it serious, do some good and hard thinking how your Hero/Heroine copes and why. But please, please don´t over use it.<br />
That shouldn´t be too hard.</p>
<p>Post Scriptum: What is it about the Navy Seals? Well, Alpha males and Uniforms, do I need to say more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelie</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-155668</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-155668</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh well, we used to have those SEALS on board though and I must say they filled out those Navy swimsuits very nicely. Hairy legs and buns so tight they were bouncing off the bulk heads.

Anyway, tell me the books and maybe I will catch a few.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Teddy, the gay arc in Brockmann&#039;s books does not involve SEALS.  Jules is an FBI agent and Robin&#039;s a movie star.  Their story starts in Hot Target, continues through Force of Nature and wraps up in All Through The Night.  Both Hot Target and Force of Nature have a hetero lead couple but Jules and Robin are the main focus of ATTN.  

There have been hints of Jules&#039; ex hooking up with one of the newer SEALS though.  Character wise, Adam (the ex) needs to suffer some more but once that&#039;s done I&#039;m quite interested to see if Brockmann intends to follow through with the hinting and how she handles it if she does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh well, we used to have those SEALS on board though and I must say they filled out those Navy swimsuits very nicely. Hairy legs and buns so tight they were bouncing off the bulk heads.</p>
<p>Anyway, tell me the books and maybe I will catch a few.</p></blockquote>
<p>Teddy, the gay arc in Brockmann&#8217;s books does not involve SEALS.  Jules is an FBI agent and Robin&#8217;s a movie star.  Their story starts in Hot Target, continues through Force of Nature and wraps up in All Through The Night.  Both Hot Target and Force of Nature have a hetero lead couple but Jules and Robin are the main focus of ATTN.  </p>
<p>There have been hints of Jules&#8217; ex hooking up with one of the newer SEALS though.  Character wise, Adam (the ex) needs to suffer some more but once that&#8217;s done I&#8217;m quite interested to see if Brockmann intends to follow through with the hinting and how she handles it if she does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisabea</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-155583</link>
		<dc:creator>lisabea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-155583</guid>
		<description>Josh&#039;s books are never trivial and always romantic. Good call, TP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh&#8217;s books are never trivial and always romantic. Good call, TP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddypig</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-155582</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddypig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-155582</guid>
		<description>Sailors not gay? That&#039;s like Marines not liking beer or raising their legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sailors not gay? That&#8217;s like Marines not liking beer or raising their legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Z. Snow</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Fromances-trivialization-of-issues%2F&amp;seed_title=Romance%26%238217%3Bs+Trivialization+of+Issues/comment-page-2/#comment-155581</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Z. Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2008/03/25/romances-trivialization-of-issues/#comment-155581</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I actually qualified for Navy Seal Training in bootcamp in Great Mistakes (that is Great Lakes to all you civies).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ever take a daytrip up to Milwaukee and cruise the Avenue?  Ooo, you sailor boys were everywhere.  It&#039;s  unfortunate there were no bulkheads from which to bounce those buns.  (Then again, it never occurred to me some of you might be gay!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I actually qualified for Navy Seal Training in bootcamp in Great Mistakes (that is Great Lakes to all you civies).</p></blockquote>
<p>Ever take a daytrip up to Milwaukee and cruise the Avenue?  Ooo, you sailor boys were everywhere.  It&#8217;s  unfortunate there were no bulkheads from which to bounce those buns.  (Then again, it never occurred to me some of you might be gay!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
