Jan
31
A Columbia University sociologist Duncan Watts a long-time opponent of Malcolm Gladwell’s “Tipping Point” theory, has published a piece showing with empirical and computer simulated tests that the Gladwell’s hypothesis is inaccurate.
The ‘Tipping Point’ phenomenon has been used by marketers and advertisers to target individual influencers of opinion. Watts says that “Almost all of the action is away from the center.” Essentially, the sphere of influence of any one individual is small compared to the greater population base and it is word of mouth that creates and spurs virality.
Via Ars Technica.
Loading ...
Open Threads at Dear Author. Want to know what new releases are out this month and what readers are excited about reading? Check out the threads below. 
We don’t like to censor comments nor do we endorse the comments of any poster. We do reserve the right to moderate comments but most of the time will not, believing, as Justice Brandeis did, that the greater good is in “more speech, not enforced silence.”
This does not surprise me at all. I remember reading The Tipping Point (one of the partners at my old job swore by Gladwell’s Tipping Point book, to the point where he made everyone in the office read it) and thinking that it didn’t really seem empirically based. Of course, at this point, the only thing I remember clearly is the intro about Paul Revere and the Other Rider who has faded into history.
I’m so glad to know this. Very interesting stuff.
Now Gladwell should write The Point of Tipping.
Har.