Comments on: Should DearAuthor Allow Its Blog to be Resold on Kindle?

By: MaryK

MaryK — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:37:14 +0000

Heck, if they want to pay you to propagandize against them, go for it. Take it down from within! :D

One day this week, the Kindle ad on Amazon had a photo of the Kindle with changing pictures of content. One of the blogs it showed was Boing Boing. I got a real kick out of that. You think Cory Doctorow is a Kindle fan?

By: veinglory

veinglory — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:30:32 +0000

WWND?

By: Karen Scott

Karen Scott — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:35:23 +0000

I voted for WWND. If you’re getting paid, why the hell not?

By: DS

DS — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:51:41 +0000

Go for it. It would be a great addition to the whole big conversation that is Amazon. And I’m sure there are readers who don’t even know they need Dear Author yet. How could you deprive them?

By: Jules Jones

Jules Jones — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:07:56 +0000

If they take a full feed, no censoring, then it might be entertaining.

Hypocritical? Maybe a little, but I think the real problem would be that if you’re getting revenue from Amazon, it creates the perception of bias. Are you nudging the reviews in the direction of selling more books for Amazon? I very much doubt you would (short of being kidnapped by Amazon representatives at the next RWA Nationals and force-fed mind-altering drugs subjecting you to their will), but it’s going to be an easy thing for someone to say if they don’t agree with one of your reviews.

That doesn’t stop me using an affiliate link when I review a book on my blog, and I think syndicating Dear Author through the Kindle falls into the same category, but it’s an issue to be aware of.

By: whey

whey — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:26:21 +0000

*compromised

By: whey

whey — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:15:04 +0000

I chose “Yes, we shouldn’t be the only ones tormented by your blog.” because I think it fits the personality (and I mean that in the good way) of this blog so well.

However, that’s only because you’ve been critical of the Kindle, which makes my reasoning seem hypocritical. (Meaning, if someone had been touting the “revolutionary” wonders of the Kindle, and I found out they were affiliated with Amazon.com that resulted in a financial gain, they would lose credibility with me.)

At the same time, I strongly support the potential increased exposure being listed on Amazon.com would bring. I want MORE people to read Dear Author.

Can I ride the fence and support the idea but recognize the cost (perceptions of compromed integrity) may not be worth it?

By: LinM

LinM — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:29:37 +0000

Can’d decide (true libra). But DA will look good even on a fugly device.

By: lisabea

lisabea — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:17:18 +0000

Go for it.

By: Michele Lee

Michele Lee — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:13:22 +0000

If you’re getting a cut I don’t see why not. Get paid to tell them why they suck? Why not?

By: Julie Leto

Julie Leto — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:42:00 +0000

I agree, if they’re going to pay you, why not?

By: Shiloh Walker

Shiloh Walker — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:35:01 +0000

gggrrrr… my post disappeared.

I had this great analogy about me saying no-never to Daddy/Daughter fetish fiction being romance

Anyway, Angie, I’ve been reading Karen’s blog and that comment almost confused me lol

Oye. Long day.

My thoughts in general on the Kindle/DA deal… well, as appealing as the idea would be to make a profit, if I were in your shoes, I’d be thinking that the Kindle deal would be feeding the beast, encouraging him. I really don’t want Kindle to get any encouragement. I’d probably pass, although money always tempts me.

By: Shiloh Walker

Shiloh Walker — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:29:04 +0000

Geez, Angie. I’ve been reading Karen’s blog and that almost confused me… lol.

As to the original question, I’m thinking, If I was in your shoes and had the opportunity, the thought of the money might be appealing, but it’s also kind of supporting the beast. I don’t much like the idea of supporting the beast.

By: Ann Bruce

Ann Bruce — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:12:53 +0000

If they’re going to pay you even if you bash the Kindle, then go for it!

By: Keishon

Keishon — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:03:45 +0000

Go for it.

By: Darlene Marshall

Darlene Marshall — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:51:56 +0000

If they’re paying you, why not? I would object if they’re using your work free of charge, but I have no objection to you getting a percentage. If someone wants to use Kindle for the ease of accessing information, and is willing to pay for that when it’s free elsewhere, that’s their choice.

By: Teddypig

Teddypig — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:08:51 +0000

Well Jane if they want to pay for it do not stop them. They want to PAY FOR IT!

By: Jane

Jane — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:04:42 +0000

Yes, DA would get a small percentage of the 99cents or 1.99 although it makes the most sense to me that the owners of Kindle use the web browser and read DA for free through that.

By: Teddypig

Teddypig — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:00:34 +0000

The Evil Overlord of Amazon does not call them Kindle Prisoners we call them Kindle Kind.

By: Betsy

Betsy — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:52:49 +0000

OK, I voted “no” before I read this:

> Would DA get a cut of the revenue? (I’m a die-hard capitalist.)

But, hey, if they’re willing to pay you, then go for it. Just make sure you keep telling it like it is.