<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supernatural Boys and the Reason Readers Love Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:36:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: francois</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-98124</link>
		<dc:creator>francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-98124</guid>
		<description>These books don&#039;t work for me. Mostly. Perhaps because I too can&#039;t believe it when these supposedly Big Bad guys turn into pussycats overnight. I&#039;ve just finished &lt;strong&gt;Dark Lover &lt;/strong&gt;and while there was the odd thing I liked, the pussycat thing ruined it for me. The vampires were too much like stereotypical humans from old school historical romance. Which is alright if thats what you like.

Plus it is obviously part of a series and setting up the other men to be saved by love in later books. I can&#039;t stand that! I&#039;ve just started &lt;strong&gt;&quot;Twilight&quot; by Stephenie Meyer &lt;/strong&gt;and IT IS A THING OF BEAUTY. So its not that I hate vampires...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These books don&#8217;t work for me. Mostly. Perhaps because I too can&#8217;t believe it when these supposedly Big Bad guys turn into pussycats overnight. I&#8217;ve just finished <strong>Dark Lover </strong>and while there was the odd thing I liked, the pussycat thing ruined it for me. The vampires were too much like stereotypical humans from old school historical romance. Which is alright if thats what you like.</p>
<p>Plus it is obviously part of a series and setting up the other men to be saved by love in later books. I can&#8217;t stand that! I&#8217;ve just started <strong>&#8220;Twilight&#8221; by Stephenie Meyer </strong>and IT IS A THING OF BEAUTY. So its not that I hate vampires&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrice Michelle</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96378</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrice Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96378</guid>
		<description>Kalen said, &lt;i&gt;I’d really LOVE to see a paranormal that wasn’t about the hero being “saved by love”, but was about there heroine being seduced and converted to the dark side (and loving every minute of it). When that book comes out (and no, I have no desire to write it myself) I may well become a convert.&lt;/i&gt;

There&#039;s a movie that touches on this theme...except it&#039;s the flipside...the hero changes.  See Original Sin with Angelina Jolie and Antonio Banderas.  Verra sexy.

K, I thought the same thing when I saw the title at first.  I lurve those Supernatural Winchesters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kalen said, <i>I’d really LOVE to see a paranormal that wasn’t about the hero being “saved by love”, but was about there heroine being seduced and converted to the dark side (and loving every minute of it). When that book comes out (and no, I have no desire to write it myself) I may well become a convert.</i></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a movie that touches on this theme&#8230;except it&#8217;s the flipside&#8230;the hero changes.  See Original Sin with Angelina Jolie and Antonio Banderas.  Verra sexy.</p>
<p>K, I thought the same thing when I saw the title at first.  I lurve those Supernatural Winchesters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96373</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 04:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96373</guid>
		<description>I read the headline, then started reading the article, but I was confused. &quot;Where are Jared and Jensen? This isn&#039;t about my Supernatural boys,&quot; my brain said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the headline, then started reading the article, but I was confused. &#8220;Where are Jared and Jensen? This isn&#8217;t about my Supernatural boys,&#8221; my brain said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96300</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96300</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe I mean something more like: I’m looking for a hero with balls (as Stephen Colbert would say). One who doesn’t spend half the book whining about how unworthy his is, how damaged he is, or how he’s unsalvageable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well then in paranormals I would definitely recommend &lt;em&gt;Dream of Me &lt;/em&gt;(the hero is an incubus, and the book is both funny and dark).  And I think &lt;em&gt;The Smoke Thief&lt;/em&gt; might work for you as well.  



&lt;blockquote&gt;For me, the PERFECT paranormal romance is Anne Rice’s THE MUMMY (even though it’s not published as a paranormal romance). I have yet to find anything else in the market that hits the same sweet spot as that novel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmm.  I read that book when it came out and was disappointed in it at the time.  I wonder if I would appreciate it more now?  I was a huge fan of Rice&#039;s early vampire novels, and &lt;em&gt;The Mummy &lt;/em&gt;seemed positively tame compare with something like &lt;em&gt;The Vampire Lestat&lt;/em&gt;, or even Rice&#039;s emotional BDSM romance &lt;em&gt;Exit to Eden&lt;/em&gt;.  

Now if Lestat were a romance hero, I would totally agree with you.  Lestat knows he is bad, but he doesn&#039;t angst over it like Louis does.  To the contrary, he embraces his bad side and thrills in it.  I think at the end of &lt;em&gt;The Tale of the Body Thief&lt;/em&gt;, he concludes that given the choice, he would always choose to be a vampire.  It was a great ending to a somewhat disappointing book.  

I liked &lt;em&gt;Interview with the Vampire&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;The Vampire Lestat&lt;/em&gt;, and (to a lesser degree) &lt;em&gt;Queen of the Damned&lt;/em&gt; best, and I&#039;m always thinking that maybe I should reread one of them and review it here, but that TBR stack never gets any smaller...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe I mean something more like: I’m looking for a hero with balls (as Stephen Colbert would say). One who doesn’t spend half the book whining about how unworthy his is, how damaged he is, or how he’s unsalvageable.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well then in paranormals I would definitely recommend <em>Dream of Me </em>(the hero is an incubus, and the book is both funny and dark).  And I think <em>The Smoke Thief</em> might work for you as well.  </p>
<blockquote><p>For me, the PERFECT paranormal romance is Anne Rice’s THE MUMMY (even though it’s not published as a paranormal romance). I have yet to find anything else in the market that hits the same sweet spot as that novel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm.  I read that book when it came out and was disappointed in it at the time.  I wonder if I would appreciate it more now?  I was a huge fan of Rice&#8217;s early vampire novels, and <em>The Mummy </em>seemed positively tame compare with something like <em>The Vampire Lestat</em>, or even Rice&#8217;s emotional BDSM romance <em>Exit to Eden</em>.  </p>
<p>Now if Lestat were a romance hero, I would totally agree with you.  Lestat knows he is bad, but he doesn&#8217;t angst over it like Louis does.  To the contrary, he embraces his bad side and thrills in it.  I think at the end of <em>The Tale of the Body Thief</em>, he concludes that given the choice, he would always choose to be a vampire.  It was a great ending to a somewhat disappointing book.  </p>
<p>I liked <em>Interview with the Vampire</em>, <em>The Vampire Lestat</em>, and (to a lesser degree) <em>Queen of the Damned</em> best, and I&#8217;m always thinking that maybe I should reread one of them and review it here, but that TBR stack never gets any smaller&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96297</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96297</guid>
		<description>Meljean, I agree that teenage relationships are melodramatic, but I guess this is why I wasn&#039;t invested in the Buffy/Angel pariring.  It felt very adolescent to me, like something Buffy was sure to outgrow, and Angel, who was over a hundred IIRC, should know better than to involve himself in.  Perhaps if they had both been teenagers, I might have been moved to care, but since Angel wasn&#039;t, the immaturity of the relationship was what struck me more than anything else.

I agree with you that the Buffy/Spike pairing was more adult, and to me it was also (becaue the age difference factor wasn&#039;t there) a whole lot sexier.  

But I&#039;m sure my preference also relates to other factors like the fact that I loved James Marsters, and thought David Boreanaz&#039;s performaces were wooden as Angel and over-the-top/scenery chewing as Angelus.  And that the whole show seemed better written, filmed and edited to me in four of its later seasons.

It&#039;s great to hear that you loved &lt;em&gt;Dream of Me&lt;/em&gt;, too.  Such an underappreciated book. It&#039;s not flawless (I wish the historical and setting details were more developed) but I adored Theron too.  And you&#039;re right, he&#039;s a hero unlike any other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meljean, I agree that teenage relationships are melodramatic, but I guess this is why I wasn&#8217;t invested in the Buffy/Angel pariring.  It felt very adolescent to me, like something Buffy was sure to outgrow, and Angel, who was over a hundred IIRC, should know better than to involve himself in.  Perhaps if they had both been teenagers, I might have been moved to care, but since Angel wasn&#8217;t, the immaturity of the relationship was what struck me more than anything else.</p>
<p>I agree with you that the Buffy/Spike pairing was more adult, and to me it was also (becaue the age difference factor wasn&#8217;t there) a whole lot sexier.  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m sure my preference also relates to other factors like the fact that I loved James Marsters, and thought David Boreanaz&#8217;s performaces were wooden as Angel and over-the-top/scenery chewing as Angelus.  And that the whole show seemed better written, filmed and edited to me in four of its later seasons.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to hear that you loved <em>Dream of Me</em>, too.  Such an underappreciated book. It&#8217;s not flawless (I wish the historical and setting details were more developed) but I adored Theron too.  And you&#8217;re right, he&#8217;s a hero unlike any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalen Hughes</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96250</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalen Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96250</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m not saying it right.

I don&#039;t like angsty heroes, regardless of subgenre, but they seem to be a common feature of the paranormal books that I&#039;ve tried. They crop up a lot in other subgenres too (lots of angst-ridden Regency Dukes and Navy Seals in Romancelandia; I don’t much care for them either). Maybe angst isn’t even the right word? Maybe I mean something more like: I’m looking for a hero with balls (as Stephen Colbert would say). One who doesn’t spend half the book whining about how unworthy his is, how damaged he is, or how he’s unsalvageable.

Maybe what I’m looking for is an anti-hero romance? Maybe it doesn’t exist. Maybe it never will (unpublishable comes to mind). It just seems to me that the real freedom of the paranormal subgenre is that BIG BAD LOVE should be possible.  

For me, the PERFECT paranormal romance is Anne Rice’s THE MUMMY (even though it’s not published as a paranormal romance). I have yet to find anything else in the market that hits the same sweet spot as that novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m not saying it right.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like angsty heroes, regardless of subgenre, but they seem to be a common feature of the paranormal books that I&#8217;ve tried. They crop up a lot in other subgenres too (lots of angst-ridden Regency Dukes and Navy Seals in Romancelandia; I don’t much care for them either). Maybe angst isn’t even the right word? Maybe I mean something more like: I’m looking for a hero with balls (as Stephen Colbert would say). One who doesn’t spend half the book whining about how unworthy his is, how damaged he is, or how he’s unsalvageable.</p>
<p>Maybe what I’m looking for is an anti-hero romance? Maybe it doesn’t exist. Maybe it never will (unpublishable comes to mind). It just seems to me that the real freedom of the paranormal subgenre is that BIG BAD LOVE should be possible.  </p>
<p>For me, the PERFECT paranormal romance is Anne Rice’s THE MUMMY (even though it’s not published as a paranormal romance). I have yet to find anything else in the market that hits the same sweet spot as that novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meljean</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96243</link>
		<dc:creator>Meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96243</guid>
		<description>And I forgot to add: I love love love &lt;em&gt;Dream of Me&lt;/em&gt;. Highly recommended, and the hero is unlike any other in romance (paranormal or otherwise) that I&#039;ve read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I forgot to add: I love love love <em>Dream of Me</em>. Highly recommended, and the hero is unlike any other in romance (paranormal or otherwise) that I&#8217;ve read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meljean</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96242</link>
		<dc:creator>Meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96242</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe because Buffy was still a teenager, and Angel looked too old for her, I just couldn’t take that relationship seriously and angst about it along with the characters.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think this is at the core of why it does work for me: her age. For me, teenage relationships and melodrama go hand-in-hand, and anything more probably wouldn&#039;t work for me, just because it doesn&#039;t fit. Like, if Buffy&#039;s (or any other teenager&#039;s) relationship had been as layered and interesting as hers and Spike&#039;s, I couldn&#039;t maintain that suspension of disbelief. I&#039;d be like: this is a teenager? Pfft. But for a teenager looking to define herself and find out how strong she is, the melodrama completely works for me (and his age, too). 

Teenage relationships are hard for me to take seriously or believe in a HEA -- but as a step along the way, I did think it was compelling. 

Spike/Buffy comes at a point when I feel she&#039;s already established who she is and her strength, so the relationship as a whole just feels more adult (and any melodrama there would have just felt wrong, like it was a kiddie relationship). And (to bring it back to the main topic) in romance, this is definitely the type of relationship I prefer to read about. A little bit of over-the-top melodrama and angsting is fine, but I like two characters who are coming together as equals (even if they are opposites), and where their relationship is funny, hot, and complex. 

So both relationships still work for me (and I see something similar to the first type in, say, a Harlequin Presents, which are a huge guilty pleasure of mine) but the other types of romances aren&#039;t a guilty pleasure at all, more just a pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe because Buffy was still a teenager, and Angel looked too old for her, I just couldn’t take that relationship seriously and angst about it along with the characters.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think this is at the core of why it does work for me: her age. For me, teenage relationships and melodrama go hand-in-hand, and anything more probably wouldn&#8217;t work for me, just because it doesn&#8217;t fit. Like, if Buffy&#8217;s (or any other teenager&#8217;s) relationship had been as layered and interesting as hers and Spike&#8217;s, I couldn&#8217;t maintain that suspension of disbelief. I&#8217;d be like: this is a teenager? Pfft. But for a teenager looking to define herself and find out how strong she is, the melodrama completely works for me (and his age, too). </p>
<p>Teenage relationships are hard for me to take seriously or believe in a HEA &#8212; but as a step along the way, I did think it was compelling. </p>
<p>Spike/Buffy comes at a point when I feel she&#8217;s already established who she is and her strength, so the relationship as a whole just feels more adult (and any melodrama there would have just felt wrong, like it was a kiddie relationship). And (to bring it back to the main topic) in romance, this is definitely the type of relationship I prefer to read about. A little bit of over-the-top melodrama and angsting is fine, but I like two characters who are coming together as equals (even if they are opposites), and where their relationship is funny, hot, and complex. </p>
<p>So both relationships still work for me (and I see something similar to the first type in, say, a Harlequin Presents, which are a huge guilty pleasure of mine) but the other types of romances aren&#8217;t a guilty pleasure at all, more just a pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meriam</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96238</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96238</guid>
		<description>Damn you, winky icon! I&#039;ll never learn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn you, winky icon! I&#8217;ll never learn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meriam</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F11%2F16%2Fsupernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them%2F&amp;seed_title=Supernatural+Boys+and+the+Reason+Readers+Love+Them/comment-page-1/#comment-96237</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/16/supernatural-boys-and-the-reason-readers-love-them/#comment-96237</guid>
		<description>I was never a huge Buffy/ Angel fan, and my Spike love withered by the end of season 5. But season 2 - when Buffy has to kill Angelus, all alone, after the most tumultuous year of her life - awesome. Shiver inducing awesome. I loved the second half of that season and the last two episodes in particular (when Buffy and Spike strike up their first alliance...). For me, whilst the following seasons were more polished and had better standalone episodes, nothing matched the emotional heights of Becoming parts I and II. Nor quite personified Buffy&#039;s &#039;hero&#039;s journey.&#039;

Also, I secretly belonged to that tiny minority of Buffy/ Xander shippers... the anti-supernatural boy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never a huge Buffy/ Angel fan, and my Spike love withered by the end of season 5. But season 2 &#8211; when Buffy has to kill Angelus, all alone, after the most tumultuous year of her life &#8211; awesome. Shiver inducing awesome. I loved the second half of that season and the last two episodes in particular (when Buffy and Spike strike up their first alliance&#8230;). For me, whilst the following seasons were more polished and had better standalone episodes, nothing matched the emotional heights of Becoming parts I and II. Nor quite personified Buffy&#8217;s &#8216;hero&#8217;s journey.&#8217;</p>
<p>Also, I secretly belonged to that tiny minority of Buffy/ Xander shippers&#8230; the anti-supernatural boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
