<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW:  Tangled Up in You by Rachel Gibson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/07/tangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F08%2F07%2Ftangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson%2F&amp;seed_title=REVIEW%3A++Tangled+Up+in+You+by+Rachel+Gibson</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: che</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F08%2F07%2Ftangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson%2F&amp;seed_title=REVIEW%3A++Tangled+Up+in+You+by+Rachel+Gibson/comment-page-1/#comment-54867</link>
		<dc:creator>che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/07/tangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson/#comment-54867</guid>
		<description>I give this one a B as well, but unlike you, I thought her trademark humor was missing, except for the scenes with the cat. I actually liked I'm In No Mood For Love- an A for me, better than this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give this one a B as well, but unlike you, I thought her trademark humor was missing, except for the scenes with the cat. I actually liked I&#8217;m In No Mood For Love- an A for me, better than this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F08%2F07%2Ftangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson%2F&amp;seed_title=REVIEW%3A++Tangled+Up+in+You+by+Rachel+Gibson/comment-page-1/#comment-54738</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/07/tangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson/#comment-54738</guid>
		<description>Jayne, you mean all the hand wringing and soul searching and OMG what if he finds out and general neurosis Maddie exhibited around keeping the truth from Mick?  LOL, I sure can't argue with you there.  I've noticed lately a real intolerance for heroines who project the END OF THE RELATIONSHIP in detailed and melodramatic terms over and over and over and over again.  You know, the "I can't have him for forever, but I can have him for tonight," and "this is the last time we'll ever boink" internal monologuing that MAKES ME CRAZY.  I know authors think it amps up the tension in getting readers to root for the ultimate commitment, but since we KNOW it's going to end up there anyway, I just find it an annoying waste of word count.  So yeah, lol, I think I know what you mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayne, you mean all the hand wringing and soul searching and OMG what if he finds out and general neurosis Maddie exhibited around keeping the truth from Mick?  LOL, I sure can&#8217;t argue with you there.  I&#8217;ve noticed lately a real intolerance for heroines who project the END OF THE RELATIONSHIP in detailed and melodramatic terms over and over and over and over again.  You know, the &#8220;I can&#8217;t have him for forever, but I can have him for tonight,&#8221; and &#8220;this is the last time we&#8217;ll ever boink&#8221; internal monologuing that MAKES ME CRAZY.  I know authors think it amps up the tension in getting readers to root for the ultimate commitment, but since we KNOW it&#8217;s going to end up there anyway, I just find it an annoying waste of word count.  So yeah, lol, I think I know what you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayne</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F08%2F07%2Ftangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson%2F&amp;seed_title=REVIEW%3A++Tangled+Up+in+You+by+Rachel+Gibson/comment-page-1/#comment-54677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/07/tangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson/#comment-54677</guid>
		<description>Robin, I think if Gibson hadn't made such a big deal about Maddie keeping her true identity from Mick, it wouldn't have bothered me as much. But she did, so it did. It all seemed like such a typical "romance book" plot device to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin, I think if Gibson hadn&#8217;t made such a big deal about Maddie keeping her true identity from Mick, it wouldn&#8217;t have bothered me as much. But she did, so it did. It all seemed like such a typical &#8220;romance book&#8221; plot device to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AAR Rachel</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F08%2F07%2Ftangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson%2F&amp;seed_title=REVIEW%3A++Tangled+Up+in+You+by+Rachel+Gibson/comment-page-1/#comment-54560</link>
		<dc:creator>AAR Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/07/tangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson/#comment-54560</guid>
		<description>I haven't been totally nuts about the last several Gibson books, but because of your review, I've put my name on the library list for this one.  We'll see [fingers crossed].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been totally nuts about the last several Gibson books, but because of your review, I&#8217;ve put my name on the library list for this one.  We&#8217;ll see [fingers crossed].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F08%2F07%2Ftangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson%2F&amp;seed_title=REVIEW%3A++Tangled+Up+in+You+by+Rachel+Gibson/comment-page-1/#comment-54552</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/07/tangled-up-in-you-by-rachel-gibson/#comment-54552</guid>
		<description>I am still a little gun shy after the last two Gibson books,  Jayne, but I agree with you that this book was a definite step in the direction of her classics.  I liked the seriousness that Maddie and Mick's shared history lent their relationship, not the substance of that past, but the fact that it bound them in a way they could choose to change for the future.  

As for Maddie keeping her real identity from Mick, I'm ambivalent about that (note to Jane:  ambivalence is my most favorite word, even more than conflation), because had she told him right up front, I think he may have taken his sister's victimized approach to the situation and eschewed a neutral relationship with Maddie.  Or if they became close, would his feelings have come from some weird sense of guilt or responsibility?  In keeping it from him, it's true that Maddie was being dishonest, but that didn't belittle her in my eyes, because I think it was good for Mick to have to find his own way to forgiving her after realizing  he loved her.  It made it more difficult for him to ignore what REALLY happened and to face the fact that if anyone had a right to feel like a victim it would be Maddie (but she didn't).  I don't know; I liked the untidiness of the emotional connections here, and I thought they made sense.  And at least the stakes were higher than in See Jane Score, where Jane keeps her identity from Luc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still a little gun shy after the last two Gibson books,  Jayne, but I agree with you that this book was a definite step in the direction of her classics.  I liked the seriousness that Maddie and Mick&#8217;s shared history lent their relationship, not the substance of that past, but the fact that it bound them in a way they could choose to change for the future.  </p>
<p>As for Maddie keeping her real identity from Mick, I&#8217;m ambivalent about that (note to Jane:  ambivalence is my most favorite word, even more than conflation), because had she told him right up front, I think he may have taken his sister&#8217;s victimized approach to the situation and eschewed a neutral relationship with Maddie.  Or if they became close, would his feelings have come from some weird sense of guilt or responsibility?  In keeping it from him, it&#8217;s true that Maddie was being dishonest, but that didn&#8217;t belittle her in my eyes, because I think it was good for Mick to have to find his own way to forgiving her after realizing  he loved her.  It made it more difficult for him to ignore what REALLY happened and to face the fact that if anyone had a right to feel like a victim it would be Maddie (but she didn&#8217;t).  I don&#8217;t know; I liked the untidiness of the emotional connections here, and I thought they made sense.  And at least the stakes were higher than in See Jane Score, where Jane keeps her identity from Luc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
