<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Romantic Times Reviews Are Not Credible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:36:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deb Kinnard</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-2/#comment-204059</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb Kinnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-204059</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey, the woman has a right to her opinion. And I give her kudos for taking the plunge and posting them in a public forum knowing full well everyone would rip her apart. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not exactly. We all have a right to our opinion, but none of us has the right to falsify. If the original poster felt so very passionate about her position, she should have had the decency to use her real name and not &quot;borrow&quot; (read: steal) someone else&#039;s. Particularly someone with so high a profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hey, the woman has a right to her opinion. And I give her kudos for taking the plunge and posting them in a public forum knowing full well everyone would rip her apart. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not exactly. We all have a right to our opinion, but none of us has the right to falsify. If the original poster felt so very passionate about her position, she should have had the decency to use her real name and not &#8220;borrow&#8221; (read: steal) someone else&#8217;s. Particularly someone with so high a profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilith Saintcrow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kerfluffle! And Stories!</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-2/#comment-166760</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilith Saintcrow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kerfluffle! And Stories!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-166760</guid>
		<description>[...] llama is so very drama all other llamas go home. There&#8217;s death threats from cover models, accusations from magazine editors, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] llama is so very drama all other llamas go home. There&#8217;s death threats from cover models, accusations from magazine editors, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilith Saintcrow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Early in the morning, rising to the street, light me up a cigarette and I slap shoes on my feet&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-2/#comment-166759</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilith Saintcrow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Early in the morning, rising to the street, light me up a cigarette and I slap shoes on my feet&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-166759</guid>
		<description>[...] big flap in emails this morning is all about someone claiming to be Kathryn Falk (of RT fame) and taking bloggers to task for being vituperative. I&#8217;m not sure if this is Ms. Falk, and Dear Author has the scoop on it (plus an update here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] big flap in emails this morning is all about someone claiming to be Kathryn Falk (of RT fame) and taking bloggers to task for being vituperative. I&#8217;m not sure if this is Ms. Falk, and Dear Author has the scoop on it (plus an update here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaden</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-40652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-40652</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not only Romantic Times with this crap going on! There are many other on line groups and online ezines that are doing the same thing! Further, I&#039;m sick and tired of reading reviews written by the authors themselves. I can name a few. 
Jade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not only Romantic Times with this crap going on! There are many other on line groups and online ezines that are doing the same thing! Further, I&#8217;m sick and tired of reading reviews written by the authors themselves. I can name a few.<br />
Jade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emdee</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-27676</link>
		<dc:creator>emdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-27676</guid>
		<description>Sarah at Smart Bitches called Ms Falk and had an interesting conversation where she claimed that someone hacked into her computer and wrote that rambling mess at Karen&#039;s.  It just gets weirder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah at Smart Bitches called Ms Falk and had an interesting conversation where she claimed that someone hacked into her computer and wrote that rambling mess at Karen&#8217;s.  It just gets weirder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashenbo</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-27630</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashenbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-27630</guid>
		<description>Oh man... What a ridiculous string of comments. I have no idea if the commenter was truly who she claimed to be... but good grief. What a nut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man&#8230; What a ridiculous string of comments. I have no idea if the commenter was truly who she claimed to be&#8230; but good grief. What a nut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the romance community dissing RT is bad for black romance authors &#124; the way there</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-27609</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the romance community dissing RT is bad for black romance authors &#124; the way there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-27609</guid>
		<description>[...] May 3, 2007Why the romance community dissing RT is bad for black romance authors  RT&#8217;s integrity is being questioned and far worse, the integrity of their reviews. Why Romantic Times reviews are not credible.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] May 3, 2007Why the romance community dissing RT is bad for black romance authors  RT&#8217;s integrity is being questioned and far worse, the integrity of their reviews. Why Romantic Times reviews are not credible.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate R</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-27581</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-27581</guid>
		<description>Now that I know the reviews are for me, me, me, I want some kind of compensation. Summer books keep getting three stars from RT and it bums me out big time. Can I send my therapy bill to RT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I know the reviews are for me, me, me, I want some kind of compensation. Summer books keep getting three stars from RT and it bums me out big time. Can I send my therapy bill to RT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev(BB)</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-27552</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev(BB)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-27552</guid>
		<description>Ya know, maybe there really are people who can&#039;t tell fantasy from reality and need to be protected from the harshness of life . . . cue the twilight zone theme here, people. Because even if she didn&#039;t write that, somebody did and somebody just needs to get a clue. And if it was really posted by her, whoa, what a hugh PR misstep because I&#039;ll never buy that magazine again in this lifetime nor visit the site. Considering the fact that I&#039;m spending most of this week shuttling back and forth with my father in the hospital, I&#039;m just so happy to know I&#039;m one of those women who spend all my time posting from the &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;quiet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; of my home. 

Sheesh. Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know, maybe there really are people who can&#8217;t tell fantasy from reality and need to be protected from the harshness of life . . . cue the twilight zone theme here, people. Because even if she didn&#8217;t write that, somebody did and somebody just needs to get a clue. And if it was really posted by her, whoa, what a hugh PR misstep because I&#8217;ll never buy that magazine again in this lifetime nor visit the site. Considering the fact that I&#8217;m spending most of this week shuttling back and forth with my father in the hospital, I&#8217;m just so happy to know I&#8217;m one of those women who spend all my time posting from the <em><strong>quiet</strong></em> of my home. </p>
<p>Sheesh. Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.K.</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F05%2F01%2Fwhy-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible%2F&amp;seed_title=Why+Romantic+Times+Reviews+Are+Not+Credible/comment-page-1/#comment-27544</link>
		<dc:creator>S.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/05/01/why-romantic-times-reviews-are-not-credible/#comment-27544</guid>
		<description>Oh my God, are we &lt;strong&gt;STILL&lt;/strong&gt; beating this dead (and by now devoured) horse???

I agree with Charlene. Tina Engler didn&#039;t build her company by being a simpering, fragile female. She&#039;s laughing all the way to the bank. And more power to her, I say. 

Can we move on? Pretty please? Anyone read any good books lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God, are we <strong>STILL</strong> beating this dead (and by now devoured) horse???</p>
<p>I agree with Charlene. Tina Engler didn&#8217;t build her company by being a simpering, fragile female. She&#8217;s laughing all the way to the bank. And more power to her, I say. </p>
<p>Can we move on? Pretty please? Anyone read any good books lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
