<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Reader Purportedly Better Than Sony&#8217;s But Also More Expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/04/18/amazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Famazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive%2F&amp;seed_title=Amazon+Reader+Purportedly+Better+Than+Sony%26%238217%3Bs+But+Also+More+Expensive</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:05:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josephine</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Famazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive%2F&amp;seed_title=Amazon+Reader+Purportedly+Better+Than+Sony%26%238217%3Bs+But+Also+More+Expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-28368</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/04/18/amazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive/#comment-28368</guid>
		<description>this thing looks like my old Texas Instruments Graphing Calculater from 1988. Way to go Spamazon on your first forray into electronic devices. Id rather use a book than this hunk of plastic. Looks like they outsourced the design to Radio Shack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this thing looks like my old Texas Instruments Graphing Calculater from 1988. Way to go Spamazon on your first forray into electronic devices. Id rather use a book than this hunk of plastic. Looks like they outsourced the design to Radio Shack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle D</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Famazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive%2F&amp;seed_title=Amazon+Reader+Purportedly+Better+Than+Sony%26%238217%3Bs+But+Also+More+Expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-26897</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/04/18/amazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive/#comment-26897</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I think I will stick with my eReader ....$400.00 is a lot of money to spend on a reader plus the cost of books.  That is until they bring the price down a couple of hundred dollars&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>I think I will stick with my eReader &#8230;.$400.00 is a lot of money to spend on a reader plus the cost of books.  That is until they bring the price down a couple of hundred dollars</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelle</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Famazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive%2F&amp;seed_title=Amazon+Reader+Purportedly+Better+Than+Sony%26%238217%3Bs+But+Also+More+Expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-26881</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/04/18/amazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive/#comment-26881</guid>
		<description>Wow...I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s a prototype or what, but it&#039;s one ugly device.  And for $400?!!!  No way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s a prototype or what, but it&#8217;s one ugly device.  And for $400?!!!  No way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah McCarty</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F04%2F18%2Famazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive%2F&amp;seed_title=Amazon+Reader+Purportedly+Better+Than+Sony%26%238217%3Bs+But+Also+More+Expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-26868</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah McCarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/04/18/amazon-reader-purportedly-better-than-sonys-but-also-more-expensive/#comment-26868</guid>
		<description>That is an ugly little device, isn&#039;t it?  For over $400 though,  I&#039;m sticking with my ebookwise. Featurewise it beats out the Sony  ereader at 1/3 the price  and  I can&#039;t see Amazon&#039;s having that much more appeal seeing as it&#039;s jsut going to  to rehash  an old  DRM and try to trap me into their delivery program.   It looks flat too.  One of my  big gripes with the Sony is how egronomically unfriendly it is.   *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an ugly little device, isn&#8217;t it?  For over $400 though,  I&#8217;m sticking with my ebookwise. Featurewise it beats out the Sony  ereader at 1/3 the price  and  I can&#8217;t see Amazon&#8217;s having that much more appeal seeing as it&#8217;s jsut going to  to rehash  an old  DRM and try to trap me into their delivery program.   It looks flat too.  One of my  big gripes with the Sony is how egronomically unfriendly it is.   *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
