Comments on: New York Times Is Behind the Times Again http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F03%2F02%2Fnew-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again%2F&seed_title=New+York+Times+Is+Behind+the+Times+Again Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:10:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Sandra Schwab http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F03%2F02%2Fnew-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again%2F&seed_title=New+York+Times+Is+Behind+the+Times+Again/comment-page-1/#comment-24072 Sandra Schwab Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:49:41 +0000 http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/03/02/new-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again/#comment-24072 Thanks for mentioning my podcast, Sandy's Podchatter. :) Thanks for mentioning my podcast, Sandy’s Podchatter. :)

]]> By: Scott Sigler http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F03%2F02%2Fnew-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again%2F&seed_title=New+York+Times+Is+Behind+the+Times+Again/comment-page-1/#comment-24067 Scott Sigler Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:53:05 +0000 http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/03/02/new-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again/#comment-24067 So let me see if I understand this scoring system - three scifi authors (Morris, Jeffery and myself) have been podcasting fiction since February of 2005. We get points "deducted" for being "just being wrong," when we didn't write the story, nor did the authors make any comments about romance writers. Romance writers get two points, even though they entered the game a year later (give or take). The times actually wrote about this style of storytelling, when the mainstream media and publishers have completely ignored it for two years, and they get NO points? I'd hate to see what the Russian judges scored ... So let me see if I understand this scoring system - three scifi authors (Morris, Jeffery and myself) have been podcasting fiction since February of 2005.

We get points “deducted” for being “just being wrong,” when we didn’t write the story, nor did the authors make any comments about romance writers.

Romance writers get two points, even though they entered the game a year later (give or take).

The times actually wrote about this style of storytelling, when the mainstream media and publishers have completely ignored it for two years, and they get NO points?

I’d hate to see what the Russian judges scored …

]]> By: Podiobooker » Blog Archive » Dodging the bullet with Romance authors http://dearauthor.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&seed=http%3A%2F%2Fdearauthor.com%2Fwordpress%2F2007%2F03%2F02%2Fnew-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again%2F&seed_title=New+York+Times+Is+Behind+the+Times+Again/comment-page-1/#comment-24063 Podiobooker » Blog Archive » Dodging the bullet with Romance authors Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:46:46 +0000 http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/03/02/new-york-times-is-behind-the-times-again/#comment-24063 [...] and comments from writers of romance who felt slighted by the quote. In fact, I’ve only seen one from Dear Author, and the slight was contributed to Sigler! Romances are conspicuously missing from Podiobooks.com. [...] [...] and comments from writers of romance who felt slighted by the quote. In fact, I’ve only seen one from Dear Author, and the slight was contributed to Sigler! Romances are conspicuously missing from Podiobooks.com. [...]

]]>