<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avon&#8217;s Fan Lit Ready for Publication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2006/11/28/avons-fan-lit-ready-for-publication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2006/11/28/avons-fan-lit-ready-for-publication/</link>
	<description>Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader&#039;s point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2006/11/28/avons-fan-lit-ready-for-publication/#comment-10584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2006/11/28/avons-fan-lit-ready-for-publication/#comment-10584</guid>
		<description>oops. I heard about that.  I still think that the level of participation was quite good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops. I heard about that.  I still think that the level of participation was quite good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2006/11/28/avons-fan-lit-ready-for-publication/#comment-10581</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2006/11/28/avons-fan-lit-ready-for-publication/#comment-10581</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s a really...uh, large...graphic. lolol

I think this is a cool idea, though I was really saddened by the reports of people cheating and purposely sandbagging other entries (creating multiple accounts and giving as many entries as possible low scores). It makes results of things that allow voting like this kind of questionable (I have similar feelings about the Preditor and Editor poll that&#039;s held every year).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s a really&#8230;uh, large&#8230;graphic. lolol</p>
<p>I think this is a cool idea, though I was really saddened by the reports of people cheating and purposely sandbagging other entries (creating multiple accounts and giving as many entries as possible low scores). It makes results of things that allow voting like this kind of questionable (I have similar feelings about the Preditor and Editor poll that&#8217;s held every year).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
