Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

midwife

REVIEW:  The Harem Midwife by Roberta Rich

REVIEW: The Harem Midwife by Roberta Rich

harem-midwife

The Imperial Harem, Constantinople, 1578. Hannah and Isaac Levi, Venetians in exile, have overcome unfathomable obstacles to begin life anew in the Ottoman Empire. He works in the growing silk trade, and she, the best midwife in the capital, tends to the hundreds of women in Sultan Murat III’s lively and infamous harem. One night, Hannah is unexpectedly sum­moned to the extravagant palace and confronted with Leah, a Jewish peasant girl who was violently abducted. The sultan favors Leah as his next conquest and wants her to produce his heir, but if the spirited girl fails an important test, she faces a terrible fate. Taken by Leah’s tenacity, Hannah risks everything to help her. But as Hannah agonizes over her decision, an enchanting stranger arrives from afar to threaten her peaceful life with Isaac, and soon Leah too reveals a dark secret that could condemn them both.

Dear Ms. Rich,

When I’ve enjoyed an author’s book(s), I’ll try and keep an eye open for new releases. “The Midwife of Venice” was one of my happy discoveries in 2012 so when I saw this book had been released and that it’s a continuation of Hannah and Isaac’s story, of course it went on my want list.

One thing I noticed immediately is that the pace and “feel” seemed off. Chapter One is a violent yet strangely emotionally unmoving opening to the story. A young girl’s life is upended but I never felt my heart catch. She acts as if her feelings are blunted – shock, I guess – but the way the scene is written my response was more ho-hum than Oh-dear-God. After this, the action moves to Constantinople where Hannah and Isaac now live after the events of “Venice.” Hannah is a midwife to the Sultan’s harem and Isaac is now a silk merchant. Hannah is called to the palace and more time gets spent describing the journey there and the palace rather than what happens after. Lots of things about the city, palace and court are described but all of it seemed more a well integrated college lecture instead of pulling me into a “you are there in this splendid world.”

The main point of view is told by Hannah yet the opening chapter is from Leah’s view though it’s the only time this happens in the book. I wanted more. What were her feelings during her journey from her capture to the Seraglio? If we’re only going to get her past tense feelings as related to Hannah, why have the first chapter at all? The villain, Cesca, is fascinating to dive into early in the story but after some scenes giving her more depth and a background which explains her drive in life, we only get two short POV chapters much later in the tale. And poor Isaac who was such a delight to read about in the first book is little more than a life size cardboard cutout from whom we get nothing.

No wait we do get something from Isaac. We get actions that swing wildly depending on what the plot needs at that moment rather than anything that feels like a real character. We need to see how happy Isaac and Hannah are in their new life? Isaac is on automatic as a kissing fool. When Hannah is needed to be seen as unsure of her life, suddenly Isaac appears to be falling for another woman. When that part of the plot is resolved, just as quickly he’s back to his old self almost as if a fairy waved a wand. None of it felt real.

Lots of aspects of the plot get rushed over too. It’s almost as if the plot skipped over water like a stone. “Two months later…” “several weeks had passed…” and I feel as if I’m getting glimpses of a story that got drastically edited down. Seemingly major issues would loom largely, get truncated build-ups and then, whoosh, they’re over with little drama. The whole has a curiously flat feel. I thought “this is it??” In addition, lots of the plot is already laid out and revealed so that I already knew what was going to happen without even peeking at the end. That took a lot of the suspense right out of it.

The finale reminded me in a way of a bad mystery/crime story in which a lot of villain exposition occurs to wind things up and explain all the things needed for closure. And rather than having Hannah or Isaac take charge as they did in “Venice,” another character serves as the all powerful judge who dictates everyone’s actions. It was all too neat, too pat and too easy.

After my delight in “Venice,” I have to say that “Harem” was a sad disappointment. From the way certain events are left, I can tell that the plan is for another book to wrap them up. However, I’m not sure I’ll be eagerly waiting since this book certainly won’t be one I’ll probably think much about after a week or so. It’s rare that I say I’m glad I bought a book at used book prices but for this one, I am. It does have a pretty cover, though. D

~Jayne

AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook DepositoryGoogle

REVIEW:  The Midwife’s Tale by Sam Thomas

REVIEW: The Midwife’s Tale by Sam Thomas

the-midwifes-tale

“It is 1644, and Parliament’s armies have risen against the King and laid siege to the city of York. Even as the city suffers at the rebels’ hands, midwife Bridget Hodgson becomes embroiled in a different sort of rebellion. One of Bridget’s friends, Esther Cooper, has been convicted of murdering her husband and sentenced to be burnt alive. Convinced that her friend is innocent, Bridget sets out to find the real killer.

Bridget joins forces with Martha Hawkins, a servant who’s far more skilled with a knife than any respectable woman ought to be. To save Esther from the stake, they must dodge rebel artillery, confront a murderous figure from Martha’s past, and capture a brutal killer who will stop at nothing to cover his tracks. The investigation takes Bridget and Martha from the homes of the city’s most powerful families to the alleyways of its poorest neighborhoods. As they delve into the life of Esther’s murdered husband, they discover that his ostentatious Puritanism hid a deeply sinister secret life, and that far too often tyranny and treason go hand in hand.”

Dear Mr. Thomas,

While it’s lovely to see the 17th century utilized as a setting and I learned a lot about York and midwifery (is that the correct term?), I can’t say that this book got me much more than lukewarm as far as a mystery. I just couldn’t get caught up in the anger, tension and fear that I should have felt. Something about the relationship of the two main characters didn’t feel right to me either.

Other things in the book felt off to me as well.”Filled me in?” Is this period as it sounds far too modern a term especially when juxtaposed after a paragraph with the word “cozen” in it. Perhaps the intention was to make the book feel more accessible to a 21st century reader but at times the seeming difference in wording was jarring. I have a hard time believing that a relatively new servant to the household would so easily question her mistress about personal matters. A long time family retainer? – sure, such a relationship would lead itself to the servant bossing a family member about but even the event which “bonds” these two women doesn’t seem as if it would allow for this. Since care is taken to spell out the social differences between gentlefolk and their lessors and Bridget often uses this to gain an advantage while seeking the truth, it just seems odd for it to be almost discarded at times in her relationship with Martha.

I did learn a great deal about common feelings and beliefs of the times such as the importance of the “natural order” of King, lord, husband/master and then the lowly women and servants. Also of how important religion still was and not merely for the Parliamentarians. It’s not just the Roundheads doing the psalm singing. Unfortunately this interesting stuff is dragged down by

lots of pedantic “telling” and un-useful information – neat little facts but hardly relevant. For instance, did we need to know how many churches were in York or be given so many detailed directions through the city for the characters to take? If I wanted a history of the city, this would have been great but here it just made the narrative crawl. The political intrigue was just so much “blah, blah, blah.” This is one of the more pivotal eras in English history and I didn’t learn a thing. When I’m more interested in the midwife aspect than the murder or the potential reasons behind it, it’s a bad thing. Personally, I dislike the use of “later I would discover that” or “soon I would learn of” as a way to convey information in a first person book. It’s used a lot, I know, and getting this info across in other ways might not work as well or be as easy to write but I still dislike it.

Throughout the book, almost every case or event delved into by Bridget – either as a midwife or investigator – has to do with sex. Usually it’s masters raping their maidservants but one in particular made me sigh. One character is already established as a villain before it’s revealed that he’s also homosexual. I thought we were past using this as shorthand for an even more vile villain.

What I loved are the sections spent on Bridget as a midwife. I had no idea about their duties – both to their clients and to maintain public morality – or how formal a position it was then. The jealousy and determination with which the midwives guarded their knowledge and prerogatives was amazing and not a thing for the men to mess with. The idea of a bunch of gossips (friends) gathering to help with a birth, chat amongst themselves and get rip roaring drunk at a new father’s expense is hilarious but also touching. Fewer mothers and babies die with today’s modern medicine but I think we might have lost something along the way.

I finished the book feeling disappointed. Often the description of the action felt dry and distancing. It’s like the writing kept me at arms length and I was not engaged enough to wish to continue with the series. After the murder was solved, there was too much trying up of loose ends that felt anti-climactic. I appreciate the historical period you used and the fact that the main character is based on such an interesting historical person but this one gets a C from me.

~Jayne

AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook Depository