Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view


REVIEW: Ravishing in Red by Madeline Hunter

REVIEW: Ravishing in Red by Madeline Hunter

Dear Ms. Hunter:

Ravishing in Red by Madeline HunterRavishing in Red begins a set of stories about a home for beguines. As the book describes it, “They were common in medieval France. Lay-women would live together as we do. Some would take employment outside the walls, and none took vows, but they lived communally.” After the war, many women were left without fathers, fiances, and husbands, and without a viable support system. Banding together is one way for the women to live without placing unnecessary strains on their family and to retain a certain form of independence.

Audrianna came to live with her cousin Daphne, a purported widow with a small property, after Audrianna’s father killed himself upon being accused of allowing bad gunpowder to be used during the Penninsular War. There are four women that live there and they all contribute to the household funds. Audrianna sells songs but she also helps to garden and harvest the flowers for Daphne’s trade, The Rarest Blooms.

Audrianna is determined to clear her father’s name, post mortem. She reads a notice that asks for an assignation with her father and immediately believes that this will lead her to information that will exonerate her family name. Once there, however, she is confronted by Sebastien Summerhays who is also seeking to discover the source of this bad gunpowder. A gun goes off, winging Sebastien. Sebastien obtains Audrianna’s agreement that they will present this as some sort of lover’s tiff which will damn Audrianna’s reputation but keep her from being hauled away for attempted murder of a Marquess’ brother.

Eventually the scandal becomes so big that Sebastien is villified and there is nothing to do but to ask for Audrianna to marry him.

Sebastien was a very engaging hero. He dallied in all sorts of scandalous activities until his brother, the Marquess went off to war and returned paralyzed. Sebastien becomes the de facto leader of the family. He notes that his life is not his own anymore, but instead he lives a shared existence.

"The life you must share with your brother. It was the reason you gave me for the investigation. You named an uncomfortable truth."

"I did not mean that the two of you live one life."

"Except we do."

"I do not see-’"

"Then look again. I wield his influence. I have his power. I play the lord on his estates and I sit at his place at tables. I have molded my life and myself to this duty of standing in for him, but not replacing him. Had he died in the war, it would have been a more tragic reason to take his place, but the duty and role would have been a natural inheritance.”

Sebastien is not a brooding hero but one beset with guilt, anger, and resentment. He falls easily for Audrianna yet she does not seem to reciprocate his love, instead sharing her confidences and smiles with his brother and only her body with Sebastien. The brother relationship was also compelling with both brothers thinking that the other is so much more worthy.

I’ve written the most about Sebastien in this book because Audrianna was a pale bloom for me, if I can use the flower metaphor. Audrianna acted silly, trying to insert herself into dangerous places assuring Sebastien that she had a gun (even if she never could use it). The hard lines she drew in the sand were quickly smudged away by her own behaviors. In found her to be lackluster in the portrayal. My attention was riveted on Sebastien and the struggles he had to cope with his new life, his love for Audrianna, and his duty and devotion to his family and Audrianna felt like a placeholder. B-

Best regards,


This book can be purchased at Amazon, Kindle or in ebook format from other etailers.

Dear Author

REVIEW: Secrets of Surrender by Madeline Hunter

Dear Ms. Hunter:

book review I know that you are a gifted writer and I certainly feel like I am supposed to understand the underlying dynamic of the characters’ motivations but I admit to being lost. I do think that you are challenging norms here and I appreciate that but somehow I could never quite connect with the heroine.

Roselyn Longworth is the sister of Timothy Longworth and the cousin of Alexia, heroine of Rules of Seduction. Timothy fleeced a bank of thousands of pounds and fled England when his perfidy was discovered. Rose retired to the countryside. Alone and scandal-ridden, she allowed herself to be seduced by Lord Norbury. She believed that she was his paramour and goes with him to a weekend party. Norbury humiliates her while there and offers her up for auction amongst other licentious nobles.

Kyle Bradwell, a man of affairs and part time architect, has a strange past with Norbury and is present at the party. He impulsively bids on Rose in a manner calculated to suppress the others and wins her even though he really can’t afford to do so. Kyle was a victim of Timothy, indrectly, and his financial circumstance is precarious as a result.

The scandal is such that Rose must cut herself from her family- from Alexia, from her sister, from everyone. She is shunned in her village and has few options. Alexia’s brother in law, the Marquess of Easterbrook confronts Kyle and tells him that he has the power to change Rose’s story.

With each passing page, I grew more frustrated with Rose. The story begins with Rose’s realization that she had been lying to herself.

Roselyn Longworth contemplated her damnation. Hell was not fire and brimstone, she realized. It consisted of merciless self-awareness. You learned the truth about yourself in hell. You faced the lies that you had told your soul in order to justify doing the wrong thing.

But her hard-earned self awareness is inconstant. She’s reluctant to be saved by Kyle, believing falsely she has other options. (and this is a circumstance in which she cannot save herself). She continues to act in ways that are contrary to good sense. Interestingly, different characters confront her on these issues but Rose’s perspicacity is sorely wanting. She does show moments of lucidity such as when she realizes that her association with Norbury has put her beyond the pale but mostly it seems that Rose lives in a deluded state wherein her past rank and her purported brother’s love still matters.

Despite the fact that Tim’s fraud left her and her family susceptible to the whims of unscrupulous men, Rose never really accepts that Tim has done wrong. After all, the victims were all repaid, she reasons. At one point, she even lashes out at the people who refused restitution.

Toward the end of the story it seemed that you wanted to excuse Rose’s constant bad choices by positing that she believed she deserved no better. I found that her bad choices were the result of Rose feeling a sense of entitlement based on birth and society.

There are moments of tenderness such as when Rose bakes pie for Kyle believing that it is a special treat and Kyle eats the pie that Rose makes even though he hates it. In the changing mores of society where those with money were growing in prominence and challenging the society’s valuation, Kyle was in that in-between netherworld where he was too good for those of his past but not good enough for those in his present. The book further contemplates the concept of the definition true gentleman whether they can be made, whether they are born. Kyle, despite the meanness of his birth, embodied the qualities of a gentleman–honorable, considerate of others, a savior. Norbury, an heir to an earldom, was not.

Even though I failed to be convinced of whatever was the point of Rose’s character, I still think this is a quality book. It’s just not one that I would re-read and I’m not convinced I could recommend it without reservation but it’s one in which I recognize the problem could very well rest in me, the reader. C+

Best regards,


This book can be purchased in mass market from Amazon or Powells or ebook format.