DOJ

Monday News: Macmillan settles price fixing suit; Eink revenues are up; Another wonderful love story;

A Message from John Sargent – On Friday, DOJ filed papers indicating that the last publisher, Macmillan, had agreed to settle the price fixing suit. John Sargent had said in his previous letter to “Authors, Illustrators and Agents” (no readers in Sargent’s equation)  that he wasn’t going to settle because he felt that Macmillan did(…)

Thursday News: ABA and Barnes&Noble receive permission to file amicus brief; Harlequin earnings up but sales down

Thursday News: ABA and Barnes&Noble receive permission to file amicus brief; Harlequin earnings up but sales down

The Straight Dope: Who decided women should shave their legs and underarms? – “The gist of the article is that U.S. women were browbeaten into shaving underarm hair by a sustained marketing assault that began in 1915. (Leg hair came later.) The aim of what Hope calls the Great Underarm Campaign was to inform American(…)

Tuesday News: Department of Justice Publishes Comments to Proposed Settlement and Responds

Tuesday News: Department of Justice Publishes Comments to Proposed Settlement and Responds

Introduction Yesterday, the Department of Justice released 868 comments made in support and in protest of the proposed settlement.  You can find both the comments and the response here at the DOJ site.  This is nothing compared to the number of 30,000+ comments that the Microsoft settlement with the DOJ generated. (A side note.  The(…)

Price Fixing Lawsuits Against Publishers Summarized with Timeline of Events

Price Fixing Lawsuits Against Publishers Summarized with Timeline of Events

Intro: In April, the DOJ filed suit against five of the big 6 publishers alleging an illegal price fixing conspiracy with Apple that increased prices of digital books.  Three publishers have agreed to a settlement which has yet to be approved by the court. Penguin, Macmillan and Apple are proceeding forth with the suit against(…)

Agency pricing and MFNs are like peas and carrots or why the DOJ settlement won’t disallow discounting

Agency pricing and MFNs are like peas and carrots or why the DOJ settlement won’t disallow discounting

Retail price maintenance v. Agency pricing The retail price maintenance (“RPM”) instituted by five of the big 6 publishers is commonly known as Agency Pricing. It is a pricing model wherein the producer of a widget, like the publisher of a book, gets to control the price.  For nearly 100 years, RPM was considered per(…)

Thursday Midday Links: 50 Shades plans on destroying every good thing; Amazon bids for .book; Amazon deal with State Dept. under scrutiny

Last week at BEA I spoke with a number of publishing people about 50 Shades. I was beginning to feel sanguine about the book. A book that made women feel more comfortable about their sexuality was a good thing. A book that got people reading was a good thing. The publishing path of 50 Shades(…)

Analysis of Barnes & Noble’s Objection to DOJ Settlement on Agency Pricing

Analysis of Barnes & Noble’s Objection to DOJ Settlement on Agency Pricing

Introduction I wasn’t going to do anything other than mention that Barnes & Noble objected to the proposed settlement between the government and three publishers: Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster but the adulatory statements of those publishing insiders about the statement really irked me and therefore, I had to post. For instance, Mike Shatzkin,(…)

Thursday Midday Links: Macmillan and Penguin assert dinners just social; Overdrive launches web based reading app

Deals: The Dark Glamour by Gabriella Pierce * $0.99 * A | BN | K | S – this is the sequel to 666 Park Avenue 666 Park Avenue by Gabriella Pierce * $0.99 * A | BN | K | S The House of Velvet and Glass by Katherine Howe * $2.99 * A(…)