Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view


REVIEW:  Jack Absolute by CC Humpreys

REVIEW: Jack Absolute by CC Humpreys

“It’s 1777 when Captain Jack Absolute becomes a sensation throughout London. This news comes as a shock to the real Jack Absolute when he arrives in England after four months at sea. But there’s little time for outrage before he finds himself dueling for his life. Right when he thinks he’s finally won, he is forced to flee London by the quickest means possible, becoming a spy in the American Revolution. From the streets of London, to the pivotal battle of Saratoga, to a hunt for a double agent in Philadelphia, this novel marks the exhilarating beginning of an epic historical series and a character you won’t soon forget.”

Dear Mr. Humphreys,

When I initially saw first the cover of this book and then read the blurb for it, I immediately requested the arc from Netgalley. I adore books set in the 18th century and especially those set in the American Revolution – which seems to have fallen from favor over the past 10-15 years – or those that look as if they will be swashbuckler-ish. This book should have rung my bell in all the best ways. Unfortunately I find myself willing to put it aside for a number of reasons, many of which I acknowledge are personal and not the fault of the book.

Jack-AbsoluteI must have been scanning the blurb through rose colored glasses and reading into it what I wanted to find. What I was expecting of a hero described elsewhere as the “007 of the 1770s” was more romantic town-centered daring do-ish romp than what I found 1/3 of the way into the story. I thought the setting would be more in London and Philadelphia instead of on board ship and in the wilds of upstate New York. Jack is forced to flee London after a duel with a character who strikes me as one of these types who will dog Jack through the story. I use the verb “dog” for a reason as the man also comes off as a rabid OTT villain – a type I dislike and try to avoid in my reading. The fact that Jack has strong ties to the Mohawk tribe and can rough it better than some of the warriors of the tribe came as a surprise. It also brings into the story the tragic effect the War had on the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy. The rents in the fabric that would eventually split the Confederacy apart are mentioned early on and I just wasn’t up to watching this happen as I find it too depressing. I also wasn’t excited at the prospect of seeing the terrible way the war played out on the frontier. Though I have read books featuring it
( Independent Heart ) the tone here was feeling especially grim.

Another thing bothered me that I wasn’t expecting. Jack is obviously a British hero working on the side of the Crown. I knew that and was actually looking forward to seeing his side and POV on the war. Jack is intelligent, competent and has a high respect for the Colonials beside whom he fought in the French and Indian War. He wants to bring the Colonies back in the fold as brothers rather than scolded children. But he’s dismayed and handicapped by his fellow British officers and the Loyalists surrounding him. Despite being a patriotic American, I actually found myself sympathizing with the poor man as he was driven towards banging his head against a brick wall and tearing his hair out due to the incompetent and or drunken knobs with whom he was working. This aspect of the story seemed like it was going to do a number on my blood pressure.

The final nail in the coffin is a subplot dealing with a secret society. I hate secret societies. No, let me go further and say I loathe them as plot devices and avoid them if possible. It’s one reason I seldom read romantic suspense novels as they are often chock full of uber black ops groups. I did keep reading far past the point when the Illuminati are first mentioned but it gnawed at me each time they came up and finally I tossed in the towel.

At some future date, I might very well go back and attempt to finish this book. The writing is well done and the plot seems to be solid even if not to my taste. Some things would always bother me but perhaps the grimness might not be such a factor to me as it is now. Some personal issues in my life right now are leading me to put aside darker books for the time being – something that is certainly not the fault of this book. Readers interested in an intelligent and flawed anti-hero in a book set on the brutal frontier during the American Revolution need look no further.


AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook DepositoryGoogle

REVIEW:  The Turncoat (Renegades of the Revolution) by Donna Thorland

REVIEW: The Turncoat (Renegades of the Revolution) by Donna Thorland

“In the year of 1777 in rural Pennsylvania, Quaker Kate Grey is powerfully drawn to British officer Peter Tremayne. But when Kate’s “Aunt Angela”, a master spy posing as a Quaker, steals his military documents, he is disgraced and run out of town. With the support of Peter’s dissolute cousin, Colonel Bayard, Peter returns to Philadelphia to apprehend the women who betrayed him, Angela Ferrers. But when he arrives in town, much to his dismay, he realizes that the love of his life Kate Grey has a new fiancé, and is working undercover for the Rebel cause. If captured, she will be tortured and executed.

Fighting for their love and their life, Peter and Kate are caught between duty and desire…pursuing their military objectives even as they refuse to expose each other. But they can’t hide the truth forever.”

Dear Ms. Thorland,

I began to hear about this book last November when DA received a request to read and review it. Since then there has been a steady build up of notice to its release. I was immediately interested since I adore Georgian/18th century books and haven’t read one about the American Revolution in ages. Still as I finished up some other books also due out in March and got closer to starting it, I got nervous. What if the crescendo lead to a dud? I always want to like the books I read but due to the setting I truly wanted to be able to give this one a green light and then cross my fingers that authors will get enthused about the era as well.

The Turncoat (Renegades of the Revolution) by Donna ThorlandThe book fires off to a quick start that sets the scene – rural Pennsylvania at the home of Kate’s father as they gather supplies for the American cause – which is followed in rapid succession by the introduction or description of most of the important characters we’ll be dealing with as well as a stomach churning look the stakes at hand. You don’t flinch at portraying the uglier side of war in the raid that the women witness or what Angela Ferrers is capable of pulling off in one night. It’s no wonder her character is so eagerly sought by the British as she can flirt, gather information, ride like the wind and take out two British dragoons while shooting backwards at a full gallop. Since Angela’s actions have implicated Kate, and Kate is rapidly proving to be much more than a simple country Quaker girl, I wasn’t surprised that Kate becomes Angela’s newest protegee though the speed at which plain Kate is transformed into dashing “Lydia” and snags a British officer fiance is astounding.

Still since it’s party hardy time in Philadelphia with the Loyalists and British whooping it up over the winter fighting break, the transition is more believable now then it then if it took place later in the war. It’s also the best place for gathering intelligence which Kate becomes quite good at. I would love to have spent more time among the network of spies but realize that with all the other threads of the plot to deal with this would have been problematic. Quaker raised Kate’s wrestling with her conscience over the ultimate use of her information does make sense though I would have bet that no-nonsense Angela might have toughened Kate up had she the time. Somehow I had an image of John Andre as being far more the gentleman spy but this portrayal has altered that and I now will see him as a nasty piece of work, especially given the outcome of the various pies he had a finger in. I had read books with American female spies dying (Shadow Patriots) but the (implied) torture scene was a hard look at the fate some probably endured before death. The re imagining of the motivation behind Elizabeth Loring and her husband’s actions are thought provoking though I’m not sure if I can buy into it especially as there is no evidence to support it.

The romantic relationship between Peter and Kate isn’t cookie cutter from the start. Yeah for a man who is excited and enthused because of the heroine’s intellect. I kinda like the fact that once Kate’s argumentative skills have caught his attention, his initial intent is willing seduction, pure and simple and that Kate discovers within herself the desire to be seduced. After all, why shouldn’t she have sexual desires and want to have them fulfilled? I imagine some readers might balk at the fact that it’s another man who actually begins her introduction to pleasure but then the relationship between Kate, Peter and his cousin Bayard over the course of the novel is intricately twined and twisted to say the least. With each new repulsive revelation in their family tree, Bayard’s character got worse until his brutal conduct was almost a foregone conclusion. The final ‘nail in the coffin’ of the blackness of his character disappointed me – really, BDSM to show this, the non-consensual sex isn’t enough? I do like that when Kate turns Peter’s initial proposal down, it’s not from some misplaced “I will only agree to Twue Love” nonsense. And that the two had already sexed each other up before that.

When the British stay in Philadelphia ends and it’s only 1778, I was curious about how and at what historical point the book would end. The way you move and position Kate and Peter for the remainder of the war is clever and the way they’re brought back together is harrowing and horrible to witness, to say the least. Kate finally redeems some of the earlier mistakes in her spying career – honestly, I could almost feel Angela throwing up her hands in frustration at times – and how they arrive at their final destination is an acceptable way close to Peter’s career as an officer without the worry of further British retaliation.

There’s a darkness to the story as well as a more believable sexuality than the usual “hop in a bed with a complete stranger.” Kate isn’t looking to protect her virginity for marriage so her willingness to experiment and be pleased works better for me than the trite excuses used in a lot of romance books. I think this also fits in with the more casual attitudes of the period about premarital sex. This is a book about war and the spies working to further the cause of both sides so I appreciate that punches weren’t pulled. Horrible things happen even early in the story but this also means Kate is well aware of the dangers she and Angela face. There were times when I wanted to shake Kate into being a more ruthless and efficient operative but to her credit, she hadn’t been at it as long as Angela and she did as much as her conscience would allow. It was a time that tried mens’ souls – on both sides – I think. B


AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook Depository