Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: Scarlet by A.C. Gaughen

Dear Ms. Gaughen,

I picked up your debut because it looked like a good change of pace from all the paranormal YA. Now I’ll be the first to admit I’m not a die-hard fan of Robin Hood but this seemed like it could be fun. Sometimes that’s more than enough reason for me.

Scarlet	GaughenScarlet is the Robin Hood story retold from the POV of Will Scarlet. With one major difference: Will Scarlet is actually a girl. Some people may not care for this change but I liked the idea of the “true” story being muddled by history. Everyone knows history passed down can warp the facts, whether by design or just by inaccurate retellings, so I found it believable that Will Scarlet’s true gender was forgotten by time. After all she assumed the identity of a boy, so aside from a few people, who would know?

And I would just like to say, after reading a rash of fantasy and paranormal novels in which the heroine is a redhead, thank you for not going that route with Scarlet. I was fearful of potential twee, but her nickname does not come from her hair color at all. (They come from her hair ribbons that she now ties to her knives.)

Other than the genderbending of the Will Scarlet character, the book follows the general Robin Hood story. King Richard is away at the Crusades. Robin was a noble himself but his lands were taken away, and now he has assembled a band of thieves and they steal from the rich and give to the poor. The story itself is not meant to be a surprise.

What did surprise me was the narrative voice. Scarlet is written in first-person POV and the style evokes an old English feel. I could hear Scarlet’s voice in my head, talking rough and sounding like a common peasant.

I really enjoyed Scarlet as a protagonist. She’s not everyone’s cup of tea. She’s very flawed. She’s secretive and distrustful but all those things fleshed out her character and made her very real to me. Scarlet ran away from an unwanted marriage and in truth, has been running ever since because her fiance is a vindictive sort. I can understand that first impulse to run. Robin and the others may dislike it and view it as being disloyal, but it made a lot of sense.

The one thing I did not enjoy as much was the romantic subplot. There is a love triangle between Scarlet, (Little) John and Robin. Scarlet is obviously in love with Robin, even if she doesn’t admit it herself, but for various reasons she considers him out of her league and won’t even consider the possibility of them ever becoming a couple. She also likes John but really only as a friend and comrade. John is a bit of player and Scarlet knows this, so she doesn’t entirely trust his intentions towards her since she’s not one for random hook-ups.

If the subplot had been left at this, I would have been fine with it. I could sympathize with Scarlet. She doesn’t think she’s worthy of Robin, so she’s confused about their relationship. She likes John well enough and maybe a relationship with him might be worth pursuing. These are all things we experience as we get older, and I see nothing wrong with that.

What I do see wrong is John’s pressuring of Scarlet. He kisses her once and then he thinks he owns her. When Scarlet later tells him that she doesn’t want a relationship with him, he doesn’t take no for an answer. Robin gets angry about the relationship between John and Scarlet but doesn’t do anything about it. He takes John’s behavior over Scarlet’s words when she tells him there’s nothing going on between them. He doesn’t go after Scarlet but he apparently doesn’t think anyone else can either. He assumes Scarlet is playing with John’s feelings. (Remember that John is the one who sleeps with multiple girls.) He says Scarlet will break up the band with these antics. This is irritating. Why is everything the girl’s fault? Oh, that’s right. It’s because she’s a girl so she gets 100% of the blame and the guys none.

Finally, I found the ending to be too open and lacked closure. I can’t figure out if this book is the first of a series or a standalone. I assumed it was a standalone because it’s based on the Robin Hood story and how much more can you drag that out? But given the way it actually ended, I wonder.

Overall, the character of Scarlet made this book worth reading for me. I found the narrative voice to be interesting and unique. On the downside, the love triangle left me irritated at best. For a good stretch of the book, I didn’t believe either of the two options deserved her considering the way they treated her. C

My regards,


Goodreads | Amazon | BN  | Kobo

Jia is an avid reader who loves fantasy and young adult novels. She's also currently dipping her toes in the new adult genre but remains unconvinced by the prevalent need for traumatic pasts. Her favorite authors are Michelle West and Jacqueline Carey. YA authors whose works she's enjoyed include Holly Black, Laini Taylor, Ally Carter, and Megan Miranda. Jia's on a neverending quest for novels with diverse casts and multicultural settings. Feel free to email her with recommendations at [email protected]!


  1. Anachronist
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 04:14:48

    Dear Jia,

    Thanks for reviewing this book. I’ve read a lot of reviews of this one around and I am still in two minds about it. You see, I hate love triangles, especially in YA. They feel WRONG in almost all circumstances. On the other hand a clever twist to Robin Hood story seems to be an interesting idea…well, anyway thanks!

  2. Maili
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 07:16:09

    I think the most interesting retellings of the Robin Hood legend are Anne Stuart’s novella High Sheriff of Nottingham and Gayle Feyrer’s historical romance The Thief’s Mistress. FWIW, anyhow.

  3. DS
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 08:53:59

    I was thinking I might try it until I got to the Little John/Robin/Will Scarlet triangle. The rest of it just confirmed I would end up being annoyed. What a waste of what sounds like an interesting character.

  4. Hannah E.
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 09:54:30

    Note that during the time period when Robin Hood was supposively doing his thing, the term “scarlet” refered to a type of expensive, high-quality woolen cloth, not a color. The first known references to “scarlet,” meaning the color, don’t show up until a few decades after the end of King John’s reign. Therefore, the fact that Scarlet’s nickname supposively comes from red ribbons tied to her daggers makes no sense.

  5. Anthea Lawson
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 10:02:31

    Good review – I’ve always loved Robin Hood retellings. My absolute favorite (plus being incredibly romantic!) is Jennifer Roberson’s Lady of the Forest.

  6. Jia
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 10:47:03

    @Hannah E.: Interesting! Thanks for mentioning that fact.

  7. Joy
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 20:30:08

    My favorite Robin Hood retelling to date is Nicholas Chase’s _Locksley_, but I’ll probably pick up hte Jennifer Roberson book before this one.

  8. cleo
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 21:32:29

    My favorite retelling is Robin McKinley’s The Outlaws of Sherwood. There’s a cross dressing character in it too, but not Will Scarlet – although you don’t know the character is cross-dressing until the last 3rd of the book.

  9. Meagan
    Feb 15, 2012 @ 23:53:36

    I second cleo’s The Outlaws of Sherwood. Not as awesome as some of McKinley’s others (Sunshine and the Blue Sword are much better), but still an interesting retelling. Though I figured out the cross-dressing character fairly early on. ;-)

  10. Charlotte
    Feb 17, 2012 @ 13:01:14

    I found myself frustrated by the romantic subplot too! And I strongly prefer Outlaws of Sherwood in that regard–the romance in that one is very tender and understated.

  11. Scarlet by A.C. Gaughen – Review
    Apr 02, 2012 @ 21:07:38

    […] Dear Author says: […]

%d bloggers like this: