Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: Far Gone by Laura Griffin

far goneDear Ms. Griffin,

When your books work for me, they’re a great blend of romance and suspense. When they’re not, they tend to be okay but forgettable reads. Unfortunately, Far Gone falls in the latter category.

Andrea Finch is an Austin police detective currently on leave after a shooting incident that left a young man dead. When her younger brother Gavin asks for a two thousand dollar loan and ends up at Lost Creek Ranch in West Texas, Andrea sets out to investigate and to get her brother out of what looks like a very dangerous situation. Jon North is part of a small team of undercover FBI agents investigating Shay Hardin, the owner of the ranch. Jon suspects that Hardin may have been behind the murder of a federal judge several years earlier and is now involved in even worse. While their agendas don’t quite overlap, Andrea and Jon work together to investigate what Hardin is up to and how exactly Gavin is involved.

It’s often considered a good idea to drop the reader directly into the action, but in this case I felt that it just went too far. The book starts with a terrorist bombing (from the perpetrator’s point of view), Andrea’s shooting incident, the situation with her brother and Jon’s investigation, without offering any good reason for me to care about any of the people involved. I can’t say that I came to know or care much more about anyone as the narrative progressed. While I did enjoy some of the action parts, I couldn’t get any real sense of who the characters were and why the lead couple should be together.

Jon is an FBI agent, he’s good-looking, and he’s a workaholic at the expense of personal relationships. That’s about it in terms of characterization, and it’s not enough. Andrea is somewhat better drawn and less conventional. She had a difficult childhood which left her very close to her brother  but with difficulty forming relationships otherwise. She’s a dedicated cop and very good at what she does, and she can be resourceful and assertive when it’s called for. Andrea’s background and characterization are more in line with heroes rather than heroines in the genre, which was interesting. With multiple points of view and the suspense storyline to juggle, however, I felt that the development of her romance with Jon suffered – too much tell and not enough show. Far Gone would have also benefited from fewer points of view and better characterization, not just of Jon but also most of the secondary characters: Shay Hardin is a stock villain, there’s a senator who’s pretty much a stereotype, and Jon’s colleague Jimmy Torres doesn’t get much to do. I’d have liked more insight as to why and how Andrea’s brother Gavin made some of his initial choices and his later decisions; it’s not really clear how he was so easily drawn in by Hardin.

Far Gone is linked to your Tracers series and some characters from previous books make an appearance, though mostly in minor roles (the exception being FBI agent Elizabeth LeBlanc, who should really get her own book). Your novels tend to work better for me when the main characters are introduced and developed before being given a starring role. In that sense, it works better as a series and not as much when looking for standalone novels.

While I’ve mostly been critical in writing this, I can’t say that I truly disliked Far Gone, and I’ve certainly come across far worse in my romantic suspense reading. But there just wasn’t enough to make it stand out in any way, and I’ll probably remember little of it a week from now. That’s pretty much the definition of a C read for me: not bad, but not memorable in any way.

Best regards,
Rose

AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook DepositoryGoogle

Rose

Rose is a graduate student and will some day find a way to work her romance reading into her research. Until then, she can often be found online discussing romance novels or sports –occasionally both at the same time. She has no TBR pile and is forever looking to change this unfortunate fact; recommendations for historicals, romantic suspense and contemporaries (preferably of the non-small town variety) are welcome.

7 Comments

  1. Jayne
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 10:49:33

    I read this book and was going to do a review until I read yours. You say everything that didn’t work for me, too. Another thing I’ll add is that I didn’t like the way Elizabeth gets dumbed down just a little at the end of this book to heighten the danger and suspense. For me this one started off well but slide downhill as it progressed.

  2. Rose
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 11:22:37

    @Jayne:
    I agree about Elizabeth – there was no need to make her appear less competent. When she first appeared in Scorched, she made mistakes, but she was learning from them, and she’s been written as a good and perceptive agent, and I think the resolution of the suspense plot would have worked just fine if she’d remained that way.

  3. Willa
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 11:30:19

    I felt exactly the same, there was too much going on and not all of it made for involved reading. The hero and heroine I just didn’t root for/believe in as a couple and they spent too much time apart in the book. The intricacies of the suspense plot was endlessly repeated by the characters and I got tired of re-reading it and it not going anywhere. Laura Griffin is an auto buy for me and this is the first book from her I have read that I was disappointed in.

    The good news is that Elizabeth LeBlanc *is* getting her own book – it is due to be the next Tracers novel and she gets together with Vaughn from Scorched – Yay!

  4. Rose
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 11:41:08

    @Willa:

    The good news is that Elizabeth LeBlanc *is* getting her own book – it is due to be the next Tracers novel and she gets together with Vaughn from Scorched – Yay!

    That sounds promising… I hope that she can outsmart him once or twice, since she never really got a chance to do so in Scorched and I think it would make for a more balanced dynamic between them.

  5. Jayne
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 14:05:25

    @Willa: The romance was probably the weakest part of the book for me. The sexual tension hit the spot but once they started to move towards a relationship, it felt too fast and forced.

  6. Jane
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 15:07:16

    @Jayne: Well crap. Now I don’t want to read it. Her romances have gotten thinner of late. Is it the move to hardcover?

  7. janie
    Apr 17, 2014 @ 23:48:22

    I’ve been iffy about whether or not I’m going to read this book. Her books are really hit or miss for me. I also have a problem with characterization in her books, especially as part of the series. Characters presented as one way will completely change by the beginning of the next book in the series with no explanation. This frustrates me. I also feel like she tends to dumb down her female characters so the male can learn to “trust” the female or save the day. There was one of the Tracers books with the female cop who was basically dictating to the seasoned FBI agent what to do, despite his advanced knowledge or her newbie status. They were sleeping together, though, so he followed her orders . . . ugh I think that book killed her series for me.

%d bloggers like this: