Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

GUEST REVIEW: The Baron Next Door: A Prelude to a...

Elaina started reading romances in high school, but only started telling people she read romances within the last few years. Historicals will always remain her favorite, although she finds herself reading other genres depending on her mood. Favorite authors include Elizabeth Hoyt, Lisa Kleypas, Tessa Dare and Meredith Duran. She’s always on the hunt for innovative historical romances—especially non-Regency historicals—so drop her a line if you have a recommendation.

 

The Baron Next Door: A Prelude to a Kiss Novel by Erin Knightley

Dear Ms. Knightley:

You’ve been on my radar for a while now as a new-to-me historical romance author, although it’s only until now that I’ve sat down and read one of your books. I was also intrigued to find out that your romances do not include any sex scenes—not even fade-to-black sex scenes. This is rare in romances, I’ve found, especially secular romances.

The Baron Next Door tells the story of Hugh Danby, retired army officer and newly made Baron Cadgwith, and Charity Effington, daughter of a viscount and Hugh’s next-door neighbor. Both have come to Bath for the summer, although for entirely different reasons. Hugh suffered a severe head injury in the war, which now causes him acute headaches, to the point of being bedridden. He has come to Bath to try the waters in hope of some relief.

Charity comes to Bath after having recently ended an engagement with her fiancé: he fell in love with another woman, and she was kind enough to release him from his promise to her. She travels to Bath with her grandmother to take part in the summer music festival. Charity not only plays the pianoforte but writes her own music. She plans to enter the music festival to show off her skills, although there are a few snags to this plan along the way.

Charity’s music, however, is unbearable for Hugh, as their homes are so close together that the sound of her piano playing triggers his headaches. Thus, when they first meet, it is when Hugh has suffered from an attack and rudely asks Charity to stop playing so he can have some peace and quiet. Charity, unsurprisingly, doesn’t take his command to stop playing well. The two start out on an awkward footing, one assuming he is an unmitigated ass, the other just wanting to be alone and in silence.

The strengths of this novel lie in the depiction of the hero, Hugh: his attacks are described in heartrending detail, making his brusque and rude behavior toward Charity plausible and even sympathetic. He believes himself a broken man and undeserving of a woman like Charity. I enjoyed watching Hugh come alive again with Charity’s help and overcoming his fears to embrace love and companionship.

Charity, however, remains a rather static character throughout the story, and quite honestly, I wanted to shake her more than once. She’s rather sweet and naïve, devoted to her music and not much else. Misunderstandings abound, usually with Charity taking offense without examining why Hugh is acting strangely. When Hugh opens up to her but then later leaves abruptly during a party when Charity is urged to play, she takes offense and assumes the worst. Hugh explains his infirmity, Charity feels guilty, rinse, repeat. Charity continues to assume the worst in Hugh, and this happens again and again as the novel progresses.

The novel also suffers from lack of actual romance in the first third, which features more of Charity and her two friends and fellow musicians, Sophie and May, than it does her relationship with Hugh. May, in particular, and her history is beyond farfetched to me. You see, May was born in the East Indies, grew up there, and is sent to Bath after her mother dies. May, we come to find out, is actually named Mei-li, although she is described as the quintessential English rose; neither of her parents is Chinese. Add to that, she describes her homeland as the East Indies—not England, as she does not consider herself English—and May becomes one of the most improbable characters I’ve encountered in a novel.

You will never convince me a 19th century English couple would name their daughter a Chinese name just out of sheer love for the country they’ve been sent to colonize. It’s a bizarre choice and threw me from the story, not to mention the sugarcoating of English colonization that results from this choice. There is also this weird blending of India and China into one mega-country, which seems odd considering how devoted May is to her “homeland” of China, which makes this entire part of the novel seem sloppy and unbelievable.

And the crème de la crème of this exotification is that May has brought along her Chinese maid Suyin (who we never see, mind you), who just so happens to be an expert in tui na, a type of Chinese massage. Of course, Suyin the Chinese maid is a magical masseuse from the East Indies. And conveniently, Suyin is able to teach Charity her massage techniques to help Hugh with his attacks. Convenient, those foreigners.

Overall, though, I enjoyed Charity and Hugh’s romance, as it was both sweet and heartwarming once they stopped misunderstanding each other. The parts where they talk on their respective balconies are the strongest and most romantic parts of this story, especially when Charity plays for Hugh. The story remained a solid B until the ending that brought in conflict for conflict’s sake mixed in with one of the most obnoxious romance tropes ever, a trope I wish would be banned for all eternity from romances.

So, with all that combined, I have to give The Baron Next Door a C+.

Sincerely,

Elaina

AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook DepositoryGoogle

Guest Reviewer

11 Comments

  1. Marian Perera
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 08:11:27

    Now I’m really curious about what “one of the most obnoxious romance tropes ever” is.

    ReplyReply

  2. Diana
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 08:55:02

    @Marian Perera: Yes, I’m curious about that, as well. The Big Misunderstanding? The Boyfriend Test?

    ReplyReply

  3. Elaina
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 09:17:01

    SPOILER(ish)
    SPOILER(ish)
    SPOILER(ish)
    SPOILER(ish)
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    It’s the, “I’m not good enough for you for x and y reasons, so I’m going to treat you badly so you’ll hate me forever” trope. Instead of, you know, talking about things like an adult. Drives me bonkers.

    ReplyReply

  4. cleo
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 09:37:53

    @Elaina: I really hate that trope too. So annoying.

    ReplyReply

  5. Elaina
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 09:47:58

    @cleo: It’s in romances so much and I don’t understand why. How is lying and making yourself miserable so attractive? I guess it’s an offshoot of the Big Misunderstanding trope, really (another one I haaaaaaaaaaaate).

    ReplyReply

  6. hapax
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 12:49:37

    Has anyone, EVER, behaved that way in real life? Anyone above the age of fourteen, I mean?

    ReplyReply

  7. Erin Satie
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 13:46:32

    I think if you really, seriously intend to break up with someone, it can make sense burn your bridges.

    The problem with this trope is the way that it’s executed. When bridge-burning is the third-act black moment, there’s very little time left in the novel to fix the damage that’s been done & wrap up the whole story.

    So, as a result, the bridge-burner does a quick about-face & then doesn’t look serious, so the bridge-burning itself seems irrational or cruel.

    ReplyReply

  8. Elaina
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 14:10:43

    @hapax: I think this may happen in real life without the person knowing it, i.e., acting badly because they’re afraid of commitment. But premeditated “I’m doing this for your own good” kind of deal? Well, I hope only teenagers would think to do that.

    @Erin Satie: I’d be interested to see a story where this trope is used believably/effectively. I’ve yet to find one.

    ReplyReply

  9. Erin Satie
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 17:00:51

    Elaina–

    In my original comment, I almost said, “What would be interesting would be a FIRST ACT bridge burning,” but then I realized that actually, a lot of books DO have a first act bridge burning. A lot of romances start with a hero or heroine doing something that ought to keep them permanently apart–and then the whole novel is the story of how that’s fixed.

    There MUST be examples along these lines–where the hero or heroine does something very cruel early on, intending to drive the other person away. I’ll see if I can think of one.

    ReplyReply

  10. Isobel Carr
    Jul 23, 2014 @ 17:29:31

    @Erin Satie: It’s not an uncommon trope in reunion/second chance stories either, where it can be quite effective. That’s basically my WIP (not “you’re too good for me so I’ll drive you away,” but “this won’t work, so I’m going to burn you good so you’ll leave me alone”).

    ReplyReply

  11. Erin Satie
    Jul 24, 2014 @ 00:08:33

    I feel like “you’re too good for me” is a separate trope entirely. And there’s truth there, too, sometimes.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

%d bloggers like this: