Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: Deadly Descent by Kaylea Cross

Dear Ms. Cross:

I enjoy romantic suspense but I like a good military romantic suspense primarily because other RS often rely upon serial killers for the suspense but the military setting or paramilitary setting is more action driven, less psychological.  I also like the camaraderie between the soldiers but rarely do we ever read about female soldiers.  I was excited to see that this series is about a number of females, at least a couple of them pilots, in a combat setting.

Deadly Descent Kaylea CrossI had read an article back in 2006 about a female helicopter pilot in the Army so good that the troops nicknamed her “Saint”.  When I read about “Saint,” I thought she would be an incredible heroine for a romance story.  Five years later, Deadly Descent and its progeny aim to deliver on the female led military romantic suspense.  Hooah.

Captain Devon “Spike” Crawford lost her boyfriend Ty, an Air Force Pararescueman, during a failed mission in Afghanistan.  They hadn’t been dating a long time and Devon was ready to end the inappropriate relationship when Ty was deployed overseas.  She didn’t though and thus was still considered his girlfriend when he died.  Her lack of strong feelings for Ty coupled with his death and her involvement with him, fuels a strong sense of guilt.   Devon had also felt something toward Ty’s best friend Tech Sergeant Cam Munro.   Cam has always returned these feelings, although both never acted on them.  I felt a little uncomfortable at how the two of them reacted so strongly to each other directly after Ty’s funeral, particularly with Cam trying to ferret out the depth of Devon’s feelings for Ty, as if to measure whether he would have a chance later.  Perhaps for soldiers who are constantly in danger, living is done moment by moment.

The story fast forwards and puts us back at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan where Cam is currently stationed and to where Devon is being deployed.   Devon flies BlackHawks on medevac missions.

The issue of Devon, an officer, having a relationship with an enlisted man, Cam, is addressed but it wasn’t really resolved well and I think individuals with a lot of military knowledge might be put off by this.  When Dev gets to the base in Afghanistan, she learns from one of the other female pilots that a female lieutenant has been brought up on fraternization charges.  For all their attempts to hide their relationship, it was fairly well known amongst their friends and things like that can’t stay secret.  Further, there was some implication that fraternization wasn’t an issue for the two of them when they weren’t deployed. My understanding is that fraternization is verboten regardless of whether the soldiers are deployed.

It may have been less of a problem because Devon was in the Army and Cam was in the Air Force, but that wasn’t addressed in the book so I don’t know.  While the fraternization issue was the basis of conflict for Devon and Cam, it was my least favorite part of the book.  I think it is because I know it is wrong, that it endangers both of their career advancements and even with the overt acknowledgement that they shouldn’t be doing this, it still seemed as if the book ignored the consequences, suggesting that marriage would solve any problem.   What’s possibly worse is that it appears future books in the series deals with the enlisted/officer pairing.

Having said that, while some of the narrative prose was a little rough, particularly in the transitions, the battle scenes were very exciting.  I don’t recall reading a military book that took place on an actual base other than maybe Linda Howard’s MacKenzie book.  The part of the story that took place on the base and in the rescue and war scenes  was vivid and fascinating.  I felt immersed in the action.  I loved how the women were portrayed as completely competent, involved in the rescuing instead of being rescued.  In large part, the prominence and importance of the role of women in this story; their friendships; their portrayal as capable soldiers, are what appealed to me the most and what sets this book apart.

I wasn’t sure if it was intentional messaging or part of the world building but there are several scenes from an Afghani militant’s point of view and through him we hear the opinions of an Afghan warlord.  The warlord expresses the belief that if they kill enough troops the US will withdraw and that will be a victory. The Afghani militant was a man set on revenge for the death of his brother. For romance readers, this story will sound very familiar. How often have we seen the hero have the very same mind set?  I liked that we saw both an extreme and dangerous viewpoint from the Aghanis but also one of a man driven from peace to revenge.  These are universal emotions.

I was a bit surprised at the way in which everyone on base seemed to accept Cam’s feelings for Dev and his near constant concern for her, particularly out in combat. I know that one of the arguments against women in combat is that the men will be overprotective of the women instead of treating her like any other soldier and thus weakening the whole unit. Cam’s actions didn’t put any one in danger as that isn’t how the story was written but it made me feel vaguely uncomfortable, as did Dev’s overt response to Cam being placed in danger. Wouldn’t she, of all people, understood his need and desire to save others?

While I had some problems with it, I did find the story to be very engaging and I am interested in reading more about the men and women at Bagram Airfield. I only hope that there aren’t too many more of the fraternization stories.  C+

Best regards,

Jane

Jane Litte is the founder of Dear Author, a lawyer, and a lover of pencil skirts. She spends her downtime reading romances and writing about them. Her TBR pile is much larger than the one shown in the picture and not as pretty. You can reach Jane by email at jane @ dearauthor dot com

11 Comments

  1. CK
    Oct 08, 2011 @ 14:51:21

    Yes. Yes. Yes. I had the same issues. Only for me, the way fraternization issue was handled totally threw me out of the story really early on. The second half is way better than the first but I simply didn’t care by then. Which is really too bad because the ‘forbidden’ aspect of the officer/enlisted romance is terrific fodder. If it had been set in an alternate reality where military rules are only similar but totally different from reality, then it would have been easier to stomach. As it is, the chances of me reading the rest of the series are non-existent and it’s really a bummer because I totally want a Clancy-esque romance. ;)

    ReplyReply

  2. Cara Ellison
    Oct 08, 2011 @ 15:44:07

    @CK:

    Your comment cut me to the core. My first book I described as “Tom Clancy for women.” My agent loved it. Editors liked it – some were confused. But one editor said that “strong women just don’t do well as heroines in romantic fiction.”

    That just killed me!

    But I’ve written a few more, and the heroines are always strong.

    In any case, I’ve never read this book, but I have been looking for a strong woman in a military or paramilitary book, so maybe I’ll give it a try.

    ReplyReply

  3. Cally B.
    Oct 08, 2011 @ 18:37:31

    Maybe it’s just me but I can’t imagine why an officer in one branch of the military can’t date someone enlisted in the other branch. Usually the root of the problem is dating someone within your chain of command, right? But you’re right, it’s definitely something that should be addressed in the book and laid out for people not familiar with the military life.

    ReplyReply

  4. Jane
    Oct 08, 2011 @ 19:49:22

    @Cally B. I don’t know but if it wasn’t a problem then I was confused why the fraternization issue was a core conflict.

    ReplyReply

  5. Cynthia Justlin
    Oct 08, 2011 @ 22:33:47

    I’m not sure how it works in the Army/Air Force, but I know in Border Patrol they *will* transfer someone based on this. Even married couples are often transferred to different ‘bases’ because of the idea that their relationship will interfere with the job.

    Haven’t read this book yet, but I love my romantic suspense to be on the action side rather than serial killer plots, so I may have to check it out.

    ReplyReply

  6. LisaCharlotte
    Oct 09, 2011 @ 12:18:01

    I spent 6 years in the USAF ( a million years ago it seems!). Fraternization is forbidden, however, military members are still human and it happens A LOT. Even within the same service there are commissioned/enlisted couples dating and married. Basically they hide as much as possible while dating and come out as a couple after marriage. I can’t remember there being as much of a stigma/problem if the couple was from different services. Of course, depending on your job, being stationed together is a challenge if you’re in the same service. It gets much harder if you’re mixing services.

    ReplyReply

  7. Brian
    Oct 09, 2011 @ 13:29:22

    I must be losing it as I could swear you’d posted a review of this when it first came out.

    ReplyReply

  8. Jane
    Oct 09, 2011 @ 13:31:19

    @Brian: I posted about it in my reading list and on goodreads.

    ReplyReply

  9. What Jane’s Been Reading, week ending September 15 - Dear Author
    Oct 09, 2011 @ 13:42:18

    [...] REVIEW: Deadly Descent by Kaylea Cross [...]

  10. Kim in Hawaii
    Oct 09, 2011 @ 14:20:13

    I spent 12 years in the USAF and the past 10 years as a military spouse. It is my general perception that “fraternization” is a bit passé as the military has changed:

    - the separate social clubs for officers and enlisted have combined on most bases (operating budgets and shrinking patronage are also factors)

    - the separate spouses’ clubs have also combined

    - privatized housing on military bases have combined officer and enlisted in the same neighborhoods

    - “family readiness groups” need the families of officers and enlisted to work together to support the families of deployed personnel.

    That being said, the military still has a need for “order and discipline.” Any incident of perceived “favoritism” can be considered as fraternization, whether it is a platonic or sexual relationship. The senior person would be the one punished for “conduct unbecoming.”

    Indeed, many couples of different ranks hide their relationship until they are married. Once married, their relationship is official and personnel decisions can be made – most likely the married couple would serve in separate offices and in no way command the other.

    I have not deployed in the current conflict where personnel from different services are interacting with each other. But it goes back to “order and discipline”. If any relationship is interfering with the mission, the commander will take action.

    Regarding the “fraternization” as the conflict, I commend Kaylea for writing the heroine as the ranking officer concerned about what others would think of her personal actions. This is the slippery slope of women’s advancement in male oriented professions – their actions will be scrutinized.

    Likewise, I thought the hero’s “near constant concern” for the heroine demonstrated that he was human. No matter what is written on paper, “Women can serve in combat zones,” it has been my experience that men are still concerned about women. It is hard to erase how they may have been raised or the feelings resulting from a romantic relationship.

    ReplyReply

  11. Ebook Review Central for Carina Press September 2011 | Escape Reality, Read Fiction!
    Oct 24, 2011 @ 13:06:01

    [...] Deadly Descent by Kaylea Cross has been reviewed all over the blogosphere so far, everywhere from Dear Author to Smexy Books to the Maldivian Book Reviewer. This romantic suspense title will particularly [...]

Leave a Reply


3 + = 10

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

%d bloggers like this: