Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: Because of the List by Amy Knupp

Dear Ms. Knupp:

In looking in my past reviews, I don’t see that I’ve read you before but I believe I have and just not reviewed the book(s) that I’ve read.  Because of the List starts out with a old but favorite premise.  Hero is best friends with heroine’s older brother.  The twist in this book is that the hero, Alex, is beset with guilt for having piloted the BlackHawk helicopter in which the older brother Quinn was riding when the helo was shot down.  Quinn died in that crash.  Alex returns home to recuperate and return to service because while it was only a job for Alex, the military and the war was a calling for Quinn.   Returning to service is a way for Alex to honor Quinn’s death.

Because of the List Amy knuppTaylor’s only family was Quinn and she was so socially awkward, she had zero friends. No female friends, no male friends.  Her only companionship was the presence of two household cats.  There was a real opportunity to explore grief and loneliness in this book but instead the focus was on the heroine’s lack of confidence and the story rolled out in a multitude of clichéd scenes with clichéd characters and unclear emotional transitions.

Taylor was a list maker. It’s something that Alex ribbed her about and is, obviously, referenced in the title.  She makes lists about everything including the kind of man she wants to marry.  Yet, it wasn’t until midway through the book that Taylor’s internal monologues included list making.  This is a small point but it exemplifies the shallowness of the characterizations in this book. The list making is a hook and instead of being integrated into Taylor’s character (as it should be) it’s used as a gimmick to provide laughs and point of conflict.  Both Taylor and Alex’s characterizations are inconsistent with certain attributes being tacked on to provide conflict at certain points.

For instance, Taylor is so fearful of dating that she is nearly hyperventilating at one point yet she is sexually aggressive at with Alex the first time they had sex, initiating it with a proposition.  I actually had a hard time buying that Taylor wasn’t a virgin given she had zero friends and she’s even portrayed as having nerve wracking anxiety by a non sexual overture from a female who wants to be her friend (that female is Alex’s sister). Her social awkwardness was played up at certain points in the book that I felt like she verged on having a true psychological disorder, but of course, social awkwardness like the list making was only there superficially to provide conflict in the moment.

The tearing down of the geeks in this book was ridiculous.  Taylor was a self declared computer nerd yet it seemed at every opportunity, she was internally mocking the geeks she went out with.  The first date she had was with someone she met on the internet who had “hidden his weirdness” which included being addicted to a computer game, so addicted that he left their date to rush off to save his guild.  Later, another nerd she dated actually wasn’t over his ex and had asked Taylor out only to make the ex jealous.  Taylor chalks this up to more geek bad behavior yet she wasn’t an innocent schoolgirl herself. She had very little heat with Joel and she was thinking of Alex the entire time they were together, comparing Joel unfavorably to Alex.   In many ways, she was using him as well yet sees nothing wrong with activities.  Her actions aren’t absolved simply because he’s a dick because she doesn’t know he’s a dick until later.   Post hoc activities showing Subject A to
be a douche does not wipe away a priori acts of douchebaggery on Subject B’s part.

Another nerd she dates gives her some qualms because he has a hard time getting dates. “As he’d humbly admitted, his dating life had been almost nonexistent of late, Taylor had smiled and nodded. She ignored the fleeting voice in her head—the one that sounded a lot like Alex— cautioning her to beware of a man who willingly admitted to having trouble getting a date.”

Alex describes one of the “nerds” as follows:

inches shorter than Alex and as scrawny as a teenager. His hair thinning—he’d be half-bald in two years, max. In his favor, he didn’t have a pocket protector or tape on his glasses. His wardrobe was nondescript but neat…wasn’t that another criterion on the holy list.

There was an uncomfortable focus on physical manliness in this book, particularly when juxtaposed with Alex’s mocking thoughts of how deficient the geeks were in his eyes.

“Joel Cavelli wasn’t drop-dead gorgeous or dripping with raw masculinity the way Alex was. He didn’t turn her into a tongue-twisted idiot just by looking at her. “


When she’d taken two steps into her room, her heart nearly jumped out of her chest. Alex lay diagonally across her double bed, sound asleep. That was the raw masculinity she was talking about. Lord above.


Brian rested his warm hand on her arm, which helped marginally. As they listened to the relaxing music, she studied his hand. It was white- collar all the way, nails neatly manicured, wisps of light hair on each thin finger. Gentle strength. Reassuring in a way. Unlike, say, Alex’s hands, which were rough and calloused. Brimming with raw masculinity that could make her squirm.

The constant references to how hot Alex looked particularly juxtaposed with how smart and nice the “geek” typified the shallowness of the characters. Just because Alex had a hard body didn’t make him a hero or a heroic lead. It merely made him a man with a good body and that is hardly sufficient in creating a fully dimensional character.

In fact, the only thing that Taylor seemed to really love about Alex was his body.

For Alex, he seemed to like that Taylor was pure and innocent. Or strangely he could smell this on her.

“As he breathed, he caught her scent. Apples and sugar. Sweet, pure.” and “Damn her sweet scent of apples and innocence.”

So pure and innocent smells like a baked apple pie?

But the gaming geek was just another clichéd character like the waitress that comes on to Alex while he is drinking and eating with Taylor. (So many inept waitresses in romance books!) Taylor doesn’t need condoms. She’s on the Pill for medical reasons. I’m not sure if this even needs to be an excuse any more. Is there
any other reason for a romance heroine to be on the Pill?

I actually would have enjoyed seeing Taylor hook up with one of the Five Brainiest Bachelors of Madison (a newspaper article provides this fodder) rather than mopey Army helicopter pilot who was one dimensional and who, while bartending at his sister’s MBA graduation party, rates the chicks around him. Probably just something those guys with “raw masculinity” do all the time:

He managed to continue to interact—albeit in a half-assed way—with his apparent fan club while making a game of privately rating the women who came up to the bar on a scale of one to ten. He probably
would’ve given Page and Kylie a seven and a six and a half when they’d first approached, but they’d each had a point deducted for wearing out their welcome.

It wasn’t so much that Alex rated these women but the way in which he gave points and deducted them (points deducted for flirting and looking sexy!) But still, Alex’s predilection for rating chicks shows how highly he values other women. Fortunately he is attracted to the brainy types now and so I’ll assume Taylor is his ten, even though it is unstated.

In the whole story, though, Alex and Taylor’s love for each other is never defined. Why does Alex love Taylor? We know that Taylor loves Alex for his raw masculinity and hard body but Alex’s attraction to Taylor is unexplained. We readers are left to fill in those gaps. What we do know (and what is stated repeatedly) is that she’s not good enough for him and that he cannot love, standard issue military bad boy think.

There were other areas of the book that contained throwaway lines which, if you thought about them, led not to the conclusion that was intended. For instance, Taylor comes upon Alex sleeping in her bed after he’s been fixing things around her house. They haven’t slept together yet and she has no idea that he is attracted to her but her thought was that if she were a different type of woman, she would throw off her clothes and climb in bed with him. What kind of woman is that? The type that gets rated down by Alex for “wearing out” her welcome? The type that accosts men while sleeping? I’m sure it is supposed to mean that if Taylor was a sexually adventurous woman that she would climb into bed with random sleeping men but I don’t think that a sexually confident women actually needs to accost sleeping men. Sexually confident women approach men who are awake and capable of consent.

Another consistent problem was that the emotional transitions were absent.  We would flip from one point of view to another but we wouldn’t get the transition.  For instance, Alex was resisting having sex.  Then he agreed to a one night stand but that was going to be it.  No more.  Then next sex scene is Taylor climbing on top of Alex and Alex showing no resistance.  There was no transition between Alex internally deciding that he wasn’t going to have sex with Taylor ever again and Alex and Taylor’s subsequent encounter. I expected some voiced resistance given his previous adamant stance.

This story was shallow, reaching for the clichéd, low hanging fruit for emotional angst. There are appealing elements but those were overshadowed by, well, everything described above. C-

Best regards,


Goodreads | Amazon | BN | nook | Sony | Kobo


Jane Litte is the founder of Dear Author, a lawyer, and a lover of pencil skirts. She self publishes NA and contemporaries (and publishes with Berkley and Montlake) and spends her downtime reading romances and writing about them. Her TBR pile is much larger than the one shown in the picture and not as pretty. You can reach Jane by email at jane @ dearauthor dot com


  1. SN
    Nov 29, 2011 @ 20:08:15

    Oh damn. I would have been interested in a heroine like this – socially awkward heroines interest me – but it looks like the execution was less than perfect.

  2. Jane Lovering
    Nov 30, 2011 @ 02:41:36

    This sounds like another book where ‘socially awkward’ is used as a plot device without consideration for all the add-ons that true social difficulty produces – such as asking for directions (leading to characters often getting lost because too shy to ask the way), fear of offending people, so not liking to say ‘no’… I have to say that I haven’t read this novel but it sounds as though the author hasn’t considered the fact that what they consider to be one, small, interesting flaw on the part of the character, leads to a whole, huge, life-affecting series of behavioural traits.
    Signed Jane – soooooo not socially awkward, honest….

  3. Cally
    Nov 30, 2011 @ 08:28:43

    *facepalm* Is romance so cliched and traditional that we really can’t find any room for modern popular culture? I’ve seen plenty examples on this site to make me believe otherwise, then something like this comes along to smack me in the face. Argh. So only hard bodied army/navy/firefighter/cop/amazingly young and in good shape billionaire types need apply for our 21st century contemporary fantasies, despite the great variety that modern ladies represent? This story sounds like a wasted opportunity.

    Sorry if I sound grumpy! This geeky list making girl throughly enjoyed your review.

  4. Jane
    Nov 30, 2011 @ 19:39:33

    @Cally: I couldn’t believe all the sad geek bashing.

    @Jane Lovering: The socially awkward stuff was used as a plot device. It didn’t seem well integrated.

    @SN: I wished I had enjoyed it before. It’s the type of story I gravitate toward.

  5. Jeannie
    Dec 02, 2011 @ 12:59:10

    I have to ask why you gave this story a C- and you gave the Jo Goodman book the same grade when, by the tone of the review, it sounded as though you disliked this one so much more? This book sounds like it deserved more like a D.

    Just curious.

%d bloggers like this: