Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: Maybe This Time by Joan Kilby

Dear Ms. Kilby:

When I was growing up, every kid on the playground knew the perfect chant to embarrass some poor boy and girl. “First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes a baby in a baby carriage.” Still, it was–and still is–the stereotypical dream of many girls and boys. The idea that marriage and children are the portrayed as the desirable foundation of happiness makes many angry, sad, disappointed, and/or betrayed. In the years I’ve been reading romance, I’ve noticed a welcome change in the love/marriage/babies script making its way into romance. Now we have heroines who don’t marry, raise children on their own, define themselves outside of that script’s paradigm. Many would argue there are nowhere nearly enough books that celebrate not marrying or not having children and I’d agree with them. But there are more out there each year. What there aren’t very many of in romancelandia are books that portray babies as, well, awful. As someone who had a rough postpartum depression, I think about this often when I read romances in which the heroine has a child. The challenges new moms face are rarely a part of the story and, if they are, they are usually caused by some external factor–poverty, a difficult spouse or family, debilitating social situations. I don’t think I’ve ever read a romance in which the mom struggles to like, let alone love and care for, her new baby. Until I read Maybe This Time.

Maybe This Time by Joan KilbyEmma Lewis and her ex-husband Darcy Lewis divorced a little over a year ago. Their marriage imploded under the extraordinary stress of the death of their eighteen month old daughter Holly who was run over by a drunk in their driveway. In the months following their baby’s demise, Emma pressured Darcy to have another child something Darcy simply couldn’t imagine. They parted, full of anger and pain, and haven’t spoken in months. When they both find themselves on a weekend singles cruise, they end up in bed together, unable to resist the strong attraction fueled by great sexual memories they have of their marriage before Holly’s death. The sex is fabulous but as the post-coital glow fades, they begin the same arguments that drove them apart.  Emma storms out of the cabin saying, as she leaves, “Next time fate throws us together let’s hope we have the sense to walk in the opposite direction.”

Six weeks later Emma realizes she’s pregnant with Darcy’s child. (They used a condom a little too late when they made love.) Emma is happy to find herself pregnant; she’s never stopped wanting another child.


Her arm wrapped protectively around her waist. The situation was far from ideal. She’d hoped that after her divorce she would meet a man she could build a relationship with, someone who would want a child as much as she did. Instead she’d gotten pregnant by Darcy, who didn’t want children, and was the one man she could never have a relationship with again.

Darcy’s reaction was his problem. And yes, she’d wanted to marry again but sometimes things didn’t work out the way you planned. The main thing was, she was having a child. Maybe it was better that she was single.

That way she wouldn’t have to deal with a potential husband’s opposing ideas about child rearing. This time she would be in complete control. She would be able to do everything right, take no chances. She was prepared to raise the kid on her own. That wasn’t a problem. Did she have to tell Darcy? Wouldn’t she be doing him a favor by keeping him in the dark?

No guilt, no responsibilities…that seemed to be the life he wanted.

She didn’t need his help. As a nurse she had decent pay and conditions. She would get a year’s maternity leave on half pay. Less money but more time to care for the baby. Juggling university with work and a baby might be tricky but having the master’s degree would give her a better future as a single mother.

However, when Emma tells her sister Alana and Alana’s husband Dave about the baby Dave is adamant Darcy must know. Emma realizes she must tell Darcy she’s carrying his child. Emma is certain Darcy won’t care but Dave is not so sure.

“What if he wants to be part of your baby’s life?”

A brief surge of hope caught her off guard. She would love to be a family again—she and Darcy and their child. She quickly tamped down the hope. Darcy had never been part of Holly’s life in the way Emma had expected when their little girl was born. He was too busy with the pub, with his friends, anything but being a family man. Oh, he played with Holly and took great delight in her but he wasn’t a hands-on dad who changed diapers or fed her or did any of the mundane caring things that led to real bonding—at least in Emma’s opinion. Since Holly died, he never wanted to look at old photos or talk about her, something that would have given Emma comfort and helped her grieve. It was almost as if he wanted to forget Holly had ever been born.

“He can’t be part of my new baby’s life because I won’t allow it,” Emma said flatly. “But that won’t be a problem. You’re right…he doesn’t want a child.”

“Take your lawyer with you when you tell him,” Dave advised. “Make sure he knows he’ll have to pay child support.”

“I’m not going to ask for support. Getting pregnant is something I want—even though this pregnancy was accidental. This baby will be one hundred percent mine.”

Darcy is stunned when Emma comes to his pub and flatly announces she’s pregnant. She brusquely tells him she doesn’t want a singe thing from him.

“I don’t want your money or your time. I don’t want your interference or token parental effort. I’m going to raise this baby on my own.” She looked him straight in the eyes. “Is that clear?”

“Crystal.” She had it all worked out how she would manage the baby without him. Typical. She’d done that with Holly, too. Made him feel as if he was clumsy and useless. And he had to admit she was right, witness the time he’d let Holly roll off the changing table. That one incident had been a game-changer, a turning point in their little family. From then on he and Emma both accepted that he wasn’t good with babies. He knew how to play with them but he didn’t know how to care for them.

That’s how he saw it and he was pretty sure she did, too, because after that she didn’t let him help.

But whether he was a good dad or not, a baby was on the way. No matter what Emma said about not wanting his money, he couldn’t shirk his responsibilities.

He wasn’t made that way. “I’ll set up an account for the child.”

Money was the easy part. Worse would be the whole emotional angle he would have to deal with. Another baby. Another fragile, vulnerable, mortal human being he was biologically programmed to love more than his own life. He couldn’t do it again. He just couldn’t.

These attitudes of Emma’s and Darcy’s don’t change as Emma goes through her pregnancy. Emma pushes herself professionally and in school and plans for the lovely baby she’s sure she’ll have. When she thinks of Darcy it is with anger and hurt but never with need. Darcy too is angry and hurt. He stays away from Emma, focusing on protecting his pub from a new wine bar going in across the street. Both think often about Holly, Emma blaming Darcy for Holly’s death (she feels he should have taken the keys away from the man who was drinking), Darcy bitter at how Emma never let him be a part of Holly’s life. The reader sees both perspectives as fatally flawed, things that grew out of pain and solidified with anger. The distance between Darcy and Emma is almost as great a loss to each of them as is Holly’s death. Emma and Darcy are emotionally stunted, stuck playing out over and over again the warped narratives they have of their old married life.

Then Emma has a baby–she calls Darcy after the birth to let him know–and, from the moment her newborn son doesn’t latch on to her nipple with ease, things fall apart for Emma. By the time baby William is two months old, Emma is miserable, stressed, and afraid. He’s colicky, a poor nurser (Emma’s nipples are constantly cracked and painful), and he never sleeps for more than two hours at a time. And the most terrifying thing of all? Emma doesn’t love him.

He might as well be a stranger’s baby for all the love she felt. If only she could breastfeed him properly, she was sure the bonding would come. And the joy. At the moment she wasn’t enjoying Billy at all. She felt guilty for not being a better mother and guilt made her resentful.

Despite her misery, Emma is determined to not ask Darcy or his family for any help. Finally, one night Darcy drops by Emma’s to ask her for a professional favor. Emma, literally sick and exhausted, lets him in and Darcy takes in the wreck of her apartment and hears William crying in his crib. Darcy realizes Emma is falling apart, putting herself and William at risk. He cajoles an worn-out Emma into letting him help and the two begin, each with trepidation, to share the care of their child.

I liked Maybe This Time. Emma and Darcy are likable, strong, compassionate people who, after the press of death, see the other through a skewed lens. And, as hard as they are on each other, they are even harder on themselves.  It’s heartbreaking to watch them struggle with denial, anger, bargaining, and depression. For much of the novel, I wondered if they’d ever find the resilience to accept the tragedies of the past.

This is a romance and thus the way Emma and Darcy face the future is haltingly, confusingly, together. In the second half of the book, Ms. Kilby shows us with subtle skill the steps toward the future Darcy and Emma take, steps they themselves often misconstrue as mistakes. I cared deeply about their–and their child’s–happiness and was soundly satisfied with the way all three found a happy ending. It is, unapologetically, a happy ending that celebrates marriage and baby carriages even as it makes clear the path to both is often full of loss and sorrow, struggle and pain.

Maybe This Time is well-written with secondary characters and story lines that compliment the main plot. I enjoyed it immensely. I give it a B+.




AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook Depository

I loved romances when, back in the mid 70's, in junior high, I read every Barbara Cartland novel I could check out from the library. Then, thanks to a savvy babysitter, I got my hands on the hot stuff. To this day I can remember how astonishingly steamy I found Rosemary Rogers' Sweet Savage Love. I abandoned romance when I went to college and didn't pick one up again until 2007 when I got my first Kindle. Since then, I’ve read countless romances; loved many, liked more, hated some. Most of what I read is historical and contemporary romance, but I’m open to almost any genre. I like my books to have sizzle, wit, and plots that make sense. I’d take sexy over sweet any day. I’m a sucker for smart heroes and smart-mouthed heroines. When not reading or writing about reading, or wishing I could rule the world, I'm meddling in the lives of my kids--I have four, ages 17 to 21--, managing my husband's practice, doing bossy volunteer work, and hanging out with Dr. Feelgood.


  1. Annie
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 10:08:09

    What a great review. Cant wait to read it.


  2. hapax
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 10:08:54

    And the most terrifying thing of all? Emma doesn’t love him

    Kudos to Ms Kilby for her bravery in tackling what is perhaps the ultimate taboo in Romancelandia — and, to judge by this review, handling it with realism, care, and hope.

    Still, I don’t think I could read this. It cuts a little too close to the bone!

  3. Mari
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 10:12:14

    Wow, sounds like a great and difficult book. Don’t know if I am ready for such realism in my romance reading, but it makes me happy that essentially this is a romance that doesn’t romanticize marriage. What a concept……

    Its really nice to see a romance working on marriage, with marriage not as an end in of itself, but a sort of “chapter one” of a long and difficult, though ultimatly happy story, if the marriage is successful. As any one who has been married for a long time can tell you (17 years myself) true love is not Ultimate Orgasm brought on by Magical Cock, or white dresses and flowers and sunsets, with cooey perfect happy babies that resemble stuffed animals more than anything else. THis is where most romances leave off and we are expected to believe Ultimate Oragasm will stay Ultimate and there will always be a suset to ride off into. Its fantasy land….fine, as it goes, but fantasy,

    True love comes after, (maybe during) pain and sacrifice, duty and chores and arguments about the toilet seat staying up or down and no sleep and being broke. I would have said I would never read a romance book like this…but now I am not so sure! I guess if one can find romance during these things, then this really is love and not just oragasms! :)

    I will say for a looong time after I had my daughter, I could NOT read baby epilogues….they made me sick and angry. None of the babies featured in them was like my baby! What was wrong with my baby?! ;0

    ANYWAY. Maybe I will read this. Thanks for the review!

  4. Dabney
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 10:15:45

    @hapax: Fortunately for me, that horrible post-partum depression was twenty-one years ago. It lifted, my marriage survived, I had three more kids in the next four years. I never went through that again but, even now, it’s clear to me that that many women who struggle feel as though there is something wrong with them. I tell new moms my least favorite stage of parenting thus far was the first six months of each child’s life. I honestly hated it–though not the kids–and am so glad the rest of parenting has been easier and more rewarding for me.

  5. Rebecca Rogers Maher
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 11:01:14

    This review makes me so happy! There is so much genuine romance in realistic premises like this one. I had post-partum depression after my second child was born, and my first was so colicky and upset I couldn’t put him down for a full year. I’ve known many women who struggled with breastfeeding and/or experienced issues with bonding. To me, these moments where love is most difficult and necessary are the most interesting and moving moments for romance to explore. The stakes are so much higher and the love story is so much more memorable. Can’t wait to read this!

  6. Bree
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 12:00:18

    After nursing two babies with severe reflux (and that was AFTER spending half of each pregnancy with extreme nausea), I’m excited that this book exists. But I don’t think I have enough distance from that time period yet to relive it via fiction.

    And with two little ones, I really can’t handle stories with death or injury to children. I don’t need anything to feed my own paranoia.

    But I am excited to see an author mix these very real elements into a compelling story. And I’m glad I read the review so I can avoid the book in case I stumble across it elsewhere.

  7. Sarah
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 13:33:41

    I bought it and look forward to reading it! I like that romance is diversifying (topic wise) though given the comments that have been posted, it seems more people are excited for the topic but hesitant for personal reasons to read it. I understand that but I wonder if it would hinder titles like this being published.

  8. willaful
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 13:41:52

    That sounds like a terrific reversal of the category romance stereotype “secret baby” story, I have to read it.

  9. cbackson
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 19:51:23

    Wow, I am super-interested in this. As a woman who is on the fence about having children, one of my least favorite things in romance is the “nine months later” epilogue in which the hero paces anxiously downstairs while the heroine is in labor, or greets her as she sits, propped up on pillows, exhausted but beatific holding their infant immediatlely post-partum. So we are made to know that hero and heroine’s happiness is complete now that the heroine has given birth. And yet, anyone who knows anything about parenting (even those of us whose knowledge is secondhand) knows that it’s both a joy and an enormous challenge, especially to relationships.

  10. Dabney
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 19:55:46

    @cbackson: I think fiction in general struggles with the paradox that children are the cause of huge stress and yet most parents will tell you their children are their greatest source of joy. Both things are true, some times at the same time, some times not. This book gets that balance right, at least for me, a happy parent of children long past babyhood.

  11. Annie
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 20:31:25

    Ahhh…u guys are making me eager to read it….its a struggle to not abandon organic chemistry right now and start the book.

  12. leftcoaster
    Mar 07, 2013 @ 22:32:48

    The last two books I read that had the heroine have a baby were by authors I really like (Sarah Mayberry and Shannon Stacey). They drove me so nuts with the lack of realism around feeding and/or sleep I’ve decided to skip books with babies.

    I woukd make an exception about this one but I also have a policy of skipping books where children are harmed, it sets off the crazies for me.

    As a side note, so glad to hear I wasn’t the only one who didn’t enjoy the baby phase of motherhood, thank goodness I find the toddler stage so much fun. Almost enough to contemplate doing it again. But then I think about those first 6 months.

  13. CG
    Mar 08, 2013 @ 06:41:58

    While I’m glad this book exists because there really needs to be more realistic portrayals of the trials of parenthood in romance, I’m so done with the whole baby=everlasting happiness. I would really like to see more stories where there is a decision not to reproduce and it’s no big deal. I’ve always known I’ve never wanted kids, and my spouse is fine with that.

  14. alicet
    Mar 09, 2013 @ 16:56:43

    What a coincidence that I read this review right after reading a book by Joan Kilby that I really liked- To be a Family, which is another Harlequin SuperRomance book. This book featured a a reunion romance between a cancer survivor heroine and her ex-fiance who seemingly abandoned her during her cancer treatment and had a child with another woman. I know this summary doesn’t seem too enticing to read but Ms. Kilby did a great job in developing the story with realism and with relateable characters that are quite different from the usual ones I’ve read in other series romance. Needless to say I quickly downloaded “Maybe this time” in my kindle to read right away.

%d bloggers like this: