Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: The Dark Enquiry by Deanna Raybourn

Dear Ms. Raybourn,

By now the Lady Julia Grey series is well known among fans of historical mysteries. And it’s also had time for flaws to emerge from it. I doubt any long running series is immune from this. The initial bloom is off the rose so to speak. You also have to balance a continuing romance in with the mystery and that always opens up a new can of worms since new ways of maintaining the tension in the relationship must be found after a dueling pair get married. In “The Dark Enquiry,” I think you succeed in one sphere while stumbling in the other.

The Dark Enquiry by Deanna RaybournSeptember, 1889. Lady Julia Brisbane and her fairly new husband Nicholas are returned to London from their latest adventure in India. It’s time to settle into married life post honeymoon. Nicholas has promised Julia a bigger role in his detecting if she can master the skills needed and she dives into this with gusto. She’s making progress even if she’s also irritating the landlady of their business quarters, and a few of the neighbors, with her less than successful forays into replicating self igniting gunpowder.

But even with Nicholas’s promise to include her in his business, Julia still feels the need to push his envelope. When she spies on Nicholas and sees her eldest brother emerging from the consulting rooms, Julia is hot on the trail of why Bellmont has professionally approached the brother-in-law he dislikes. What starts out as a simple blackmail case quickly balloons into something much worse – something that, if not stopped, could end up bringing down the entire government and tipping the balance of power in a Europe poised for war.

The last two books in the series had the problem of long separations between Julia and Brisbaine. This book fixes that and the two of them are center stage for much of the story. Once again, Julia is almost desperate to be included in Brisbane’s work and pushes far past the level of involvement that he thinks is safe for her. But I can see that this is her nature. She grew up in a large family that held few secrets from each other and which delights in getting in each other’s affairs. I don’t think she’s capable of just sitting at home and not trying to figure out the why of the cases Brisbaine gets hired to do. She’s also an aristocrat and honestly seems to think that, due to her status as such, nothing really bad could happen to her.

Nicholas, on the other hand, knows all to well and continues to grind down his back teeth in exasperation at the hijinks she gets into. But in this book, I truly see why Nicholas is so concerned and reluctant to include her. He grew up without much either materially or emotionally and in Julia has found the woman he loves almost to distraction. When he tells her that he loves her above all else it’s almost as if it has to be dragged out of him and this makes me believe it more than pages of flowery declarations of undying devotion. He isn’t just stubbornly putting her off, he’s trying to protect her.

Here I think their relationship truly advances – once they’ve butted heads a bit – as they talk and open up about why she feels the need to keep pushing and why he can’t help but want to swaddle her from all hurts. They’re still going to have problems about this issue but at least they’re dialoguing about it and not at such cross purposes.

So, on to the mystery part of the book. The basic premise here is fantastic and something that I can easily see happening. What is it about politicians and sex? Every time a new scandal emerges I can’t help but think, “Do these idjuts not pay any damn attention to the others who have – pardon the pun – fucked up with their peckers?” Since it has kept happening for centuries, I guess the answer to that is “No.” But while the basis for Brisbane and Julia’s investigation is age old and totally believable, the resolution of the case here leaves me cold. One thing I hate in a mystery is when the villain is out of the blue and totally from left field. Authors don’t have to drop BIG OBVIOUS CLUES throughout the book but some hints that might allow me to work out the villain’s identity is appreciated. When the reveal occurs and my first thought is “where the hell did that come from?!” I get pissed.

Here everything hinges on one piece of information that Julia conveniently forgets until a gun is being brandished in her face. Oh yeah, that clue! This is augmented by a couple of “let me spell out my complete involvement in this case” scenes wherein various people suddenly and happily quote chapter and verse to Julia and Brisbane about all they know regarding the case. Let’s hear it for deus ex machinas solving everything.

There’s also one last thing that I didn’t see the need for. When the villain is overcome, something happens to Julia which is another “where did this come from” issue. Since nothing is even hinted about it until that moment, I have no emotional investment at all and when it is seemingly just as quickly moved past, I have to wonder why include this at all? To me, this is a pretty major deal to be tacked on and then rushed over.

I finished the book conflicted about the grade. On the one hand, the relationship between Julia and Brisbane is delved into and focused on much more than in past books. Everything still isn’t rosy and smooth sailing, which I see the need for as the series will continue – on to Rome next – but at least the two of them are physically together more and talking. Julia also shows Brisbane that she’s learning to reason out a case and not just plunge into it. But the resolution of this case sideswiped me in more ways than one and that does not make me happy. End balance? a B-


Goodreads | Amazon | BN | nook | Sony | Kobo

Another long time reader who read romance novels in her teens, then took a long break before started back again about 15 years ago. She enjoys historical romance/fiction best, likes contemporaries, action- adventure and mysteries, will read suspense if there's no TSTL characters and is currently reading very few paranormals.


  1. Kim
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 18:02:22

    @Jayne I just finished this book and really liked it.That said, I think Julia acted too impulsively in this book. If she wants Nichola to trust her in his investigations, then shouldn’t she be more cautious? In the past she’s been much smarter in her activities. In this book she kept making foolish choices.

    I have to disagree with two sections of your review. I did figure out the villain. Didn’t you find the villain a little too conveniently involved with the Brisbanes? As for the secret at the end, I thought that was a possibility half way through the book. I’ll give why below, but other readers, don’t look further if you don’t want any spoilers.
    There were a couple of passages about Julia’s fatigue and ravenous appetite.I wondered if the secret was the cause.

    I look forward to the next one in the series, but Deanna Raybourn said her publisher wants her to take a break and write something new.

  2. DS
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 18:33:37



    Goodness, I hate that particular trope. I always pick up on it and feel irritated. I just read a mystery where the heroine was a gynecologist and the author still used it.

  3. Jayne
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 18:33:56

    @Kim: Well, the Brisbains have so many people coming in and out of their lives that no, the id of the villain didn’t occur to me. And I must have totally missed the other info you mentioned as well. Still, what happened seemed like it needed…I don’t know…more airtime or something. Maybe it will be revisited or resolved in the next book.

  4. Marg
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 20:01:48

    For me this is one of the strongest historical mystery series currently going around. I was shocked by the events at the end, and I think it will be revisited in future books, but in a way it also means that the mysteries can continue to be the focus.

    I am already looking forward to the next one!

  5. R E G
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 20:45:43

    I love this series, but I have to admit Julia is a spoiled brat and Nicholas is a bit of a jerk.

    That’s OK. If Daddy is an earl you will be a spoiled brat, and if you are a Victorian husband, you will be a bit of a jerk.

    Somehow that just adds to the realism for me.

  6. Debbye
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 20:46:54

    If you’re going to review a book, I suggest you get the characters’ names right. It’s Brisbane, not Brisbain.

  7. SN
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 21:47:48

    Great review!

    The name is the same as the Australian city: Brisbane. I suspect many Americans would get it wrong because they mispronounce the city’s name too.
    It’s pronounced “Briz-benn”. The A sound is very soft.

  8. Laura
    Jul 26, 2011 @ 22:20:22

    Geez Debbie, have a hard day? Oops, Debbye. Sorry. Atleast it wasn’t a book review.

  9. Jayne
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 07:09:47

    @R E G: I think Nicholas was a bit less jerky this go round. Or his motivations were explained more to Julia’s (and our) understanding. I wouldn’t exactly say he’s mellowing out but he is easing up slightly. ;)

  10. Jayne
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 07:11:34

    Oops about the name mistake. It’s been corrected here and I went back and checked all my other Lady Julia Grey reviews to ensure I hadn’t done it previously.

  11. Jayne
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 07:13:27

    @SN: If I ever get the chance to visit Brisbane, at least I’ll know how to pronounce it now. Thanks!

  12. Stephanie
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 09:20:32

    I enjoy the series, but this was the first one in which I felt Raybourn didn’t quite play fair with the reader. Ideally, the author gives the reader enough of the pieces to solve the mystery before the Big Reveal. For me, the biggest sticking point in this whodunnit is how the villain could have been in two places at once. Yes, an explanation is ultimately provided, but Raybourn kind of fudges the facts by being purposefully vague about the distance between the villain’s supposed whereabouts and the scene of the crime.

    The development on the personal front was a bit too reminiscent of a recent entry in Tasha Alexander’s Lady Emily mysteries, also set in the Victorian period. Granted, the tone of both series is different–Raybourn’s has more humor, I think, and Julia is more flawed and human than the “practically perfect” Emily– but I still wish the issue hadn’t arisen and been resolved in so similar a fashion.

    That being said, I still look forward to the next Lady Julia mystery, and Raybourn’s next effort, which I’ve heard may be something different altogether. It’s good for an author to shift gears now and then, and Raybourn writes well enough that I’ll sample whatever she decides to turn her hand to.

  13. orannia
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 15:44:06

    Lovely review Jayne. I am looking forward to reading this, but I think the first book will always be my favourite. The first two lines of the first book still blow me away.

  14. Jayne
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 18:43:13

    @Stephanie: I read the first two Lady Emily books then sort of lost interest. I wonder if Raybourn will try something more contemporary next since she did a gothic book earlier.

  15. Hannah
    Jul 27, 2011 @ 20:03:55

    @Jayne apparently she’s writing a book set in 1920s Kenya with a half-British, half-American heroine.

  16. Jayne
    Jul 28, 2011 @ 13:24:24

    @Hannah: That description has me salivating already.

  17. The Dark Enquiry by Deanna Raybourn | Janicu's Book Blog
    Nov 01, 2011 @ 16:43:46

    […] less frustrated viewpoint on this installment) Angieville – positive (ditto to the above) Dear Author – B- Share this:StumbleUponDiggRedditTwitterEmailPrintFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to […]

%d bloggers like this: