Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: Silent Night: A Lady Julia Christmas Novella by Deanna...

Dear Ms. Raybourn:

While waiting for the next “Lady Julia” mystery novel, I noticed that this little novella is on offer for the Christmas season. It’s not long, it’s not complicated and it’s not that different from any other Lady Julia story. If readers like this world and it’s people, it should be a nice little nibble to devour in an afternoon. But they shouldn’t look for new situations or a different direction for Julia and Brisbane.

Silent-NightDespite her initial plans to spend the holiday in Italy, Julia, Brisbane and their assorted menagerie find themselves headed towards Bellmont Abbey for a March family Christmas. The other usual suspects are with them – Portia plus Jane the Younger and dogs – or will be soon – Plum and his waistcoats. Julia’s plans to stay separately at the Rookery are dashed by a large oak demolishing the roof of the little dower house her father had gifted her with. Stuck at the Abbey she and Brisbane soon discover that all is not well. The butler is in the pantry with the best brandy, half the staff are sick, there’s been a new ghost sighted and soon tiny, but expensive, items begin to go missing. And what is the reason for her father’s foul mood? Julia is determined to solve the mysteries and continue to wind Brisbane around her little finger.

I almost hate to say it but this novella is verging on a parody of the Lady Julia oeuvre. Half of the March family will be home for the holidays and those who are traveling there are loaded down with more animals than there are at the London Zoo. Plus Jane the Younger is teething and squalling, Brisbane disagrees with Julia wishing to investigate, Portia is overbearing, Plum is slightly waspish, the Abbey staff are at sixes and sevens and Julia is alternately playing Lady Bountiful to the staff and using sex to manipulate Brisbane.

Honestly, there’s nothing new here. The mystery is fairly easily solved just by following the trail of stolen objects, Lady Julia sticks her nose into every one’s business, Brisbane glowers in between intensive marital bouts in bed, Jane the Younger screams, animals create mayhem and the Earl acts Lord of the Manor. Well, he is Lord of the Manor but you know what I mean. As a filler until there’s a new novel, it’s fine if a trifle familiar in every aspect and most details. B-

~Jayne

AmazonBNSonyKoboAREBook Depository

Another long time reader who read romance novels in her teens, then took a long break before started back again about 15 years ago. She enjoys historical romance/fiction best, likes contemporaries, action- adventure and mysteries, will read suspense if there's no TSTL characters and is currently reading very few paranormals.

5 Comments

  1. Brian
    Dec 03, 2012 @ 11:39:08

    As a filler until there’s a new novel, it’s fine if a trifle familiar in every aspect and most details.

    A very good description. I found it a nice short visit with the various characters.

    ReplyReply

  2. Katie T.
    Dec 04, 2012 @ 02:28:35

    B- is far too generous of you. I loved (or at least liked) all the Lady Julia books, but absolutely loathed this one. There’s no plot whatsoever, it’s like a mishmash of characters thrown together with a poorly contrived plot (arguably, there was none) because Deanna Raybourn had a midnight deadline and forgot all about it until 2 hours before. I hated Jane the Younger too, although she is not exclusive to this novella. The good thing about a fictional teething baby and a flatulent pug is that I can imagine kicking and stomping them both in my mind with no guilt whatsoever.

    ReplyReply

  3. Jayne
    Dec 04, 2012 @ 04:25:16

    @Katie T.: Well, Portia has always been my least favorite character – and not because she’s lesbian, just because she’s a PITA – so I’m not surprised that my next least favorite characters – Jane the Younger and the pug – are associated with her. But perhaps there’s hope for Jane since she’s just an infant. The pug is a lost cause.

    ReplyReply

  4. jennifer
    Dec 04, 2012 @ 09:19:05

    I know it’s meant as a trifle, but oh, I miss the angst.

    Not sure I like the “smug marrieds”* that Julia and Nicholas have become; want the romantic anguish, not Julia telling me on very other page how much she’s gettin’.

    *pulled out a Bridget Jones reference, woo!

    ReplyReply

  5. Jayne
    Dec 04, 2012 @ 11:22:00

    @jennifer: Yeah, they are burning up the sheets, aren’t they? I’m surprised Nicholas isn’t described as a man with a hunted look in his eyes yet. Or that he isn’t staggering down the Abbey hallways.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

%d bloggers like this: