Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: A Gentleman Undone by Cecilia Grant

Dear Ms. Grant:

Your debut novel, A Lady Awakened, is one of my favorite Romances of the past year. So I was particularly excited to read A Gentleman Undone, not only to catch up with the delightfully perverse Martha and her new husband, Theo, but also to discover if Martha’s brother, Will, made as fascinating a character study as she did. Had I not loved the first novel so much, I’m not sure I would have persisted to the middle of A Gentleman Undone, where I finally became engaged with the story and invested in the protagonists. In the end, I was glad I did finish the book, but I cannot recommend the novel without some substantial reservations about its pacing.

A Gentleman Undone by Cecelia GrantWill Blackshear brought a dark burden home with him from Waterloo, as well as a promise to provide for the widow and child of a fellow soldier – a man whose suffering and peril Will inadvertently exacerbated in his quest to save him. While we understand that Will’s self-blame is undeserved, his secrecy in regard to his pain makes it impossible for anyone to grant him absolution. What drives Will now is the need to make several thousand pounds quickly, so that he can secure financial freedom for his friend’s widow and son, bringing him to a somewhat respectable London gaming establishment in pursuit of a fortune from vingt-et-un.

So when he finds himself fleeced – by a courtesan, no less – he can hardly believe his poor luck. It is one thing to lose honestly, but this woman, who, not incidentally, had captured Will’s attention in other ways, had no right to cheat Will out of his much-needed and deserved winnings.

What Will does not know is that Lydia Slaughter is as hungry for a quick fortune as he, and she has even less time in which to secure it. Her current benefactor, Edward Roanoke (or “Prince Square-jaw,” as Will likes to call him), got her out of the brothel in which she had been working, and now she has to continue the forward momentum by using one of her greatest natural assets – her incredibly nimble grasp of numbers, especially as they conspire into odds at the gaming table. Lydia does not believe in luck; she keeps her faith in mathematics and in understanding (and thereby profiting from) the rules of the house.

Like Will, Lydia has some dark secrets in her past and an unearned burden of guilt, but unlike him, she does not have the privileges of the male gender, even the lesser benefits bestowed on untitled younger sons. However, Lydia does indulge in her own form of self-punishment, which, like her looks and her demeanor, tends to the unconventional: she indulges her robust carnal appetites without shame and with an almost aggressive ardor.

There are some Romance novels that work for me precisely because they play out genre codes and tropes so skillfully that I buy a love and a happiness I would likely reject in a real life context. This is not one of those books, at least not in terms of what draws Lydia and Will together; this is a book that challenges those very tropes and tries to make its own rules in the process. Will and Lydia’s meeting is one of happenstance that generates a logical need for further engagement and conflict: he will not walk away from the compelling stranger he is convinced cheated him.

In a more conventional Romance, Lydia and Will would likely begin a clandestine romance, endangering Lydia’s position with Edward and spurring all sorts of rescue fantasies in Will. Here, however, Lydia and Will ultimately enter into an entrepreneurial partnership in which they endeavor to help each other win the money they each require. Will needs Lydia’s mathematical skills, and Lydia needs Will’s presence at the lesser (and higher stakes) gaming hells at which they will be playing. And Lydia has made it very clear to Will that she will not sleep with him, especially given her precarious position as another man’s mistress – a man whose whim could send her out on the streets without any protection. Will is certainly in no position to take in a mistress. Because this is a Romance, we know Will and Lydia will eventually end up together, so much of the pleasure of the novel depends on how that relationship will grow and flourish given the somewhat unusual circumstances of its genesis (not the least of which is the fact that Lydia is actively sleeping with Edward while developing an emotional attachment to Will).

As in A Lady Awakened, this novel’s strength is built on the heroine’s intelligence and self-awareness, and on her need for personal agency within a society that seeks to limit a woman’s will in myriad ways. Lydia is incredibly aware of her social marginalization, and of the fact that her sexuality has commercial value, but likely not enough to purchase the economic freedom she seeks. That Lydia enjoys sex is more an irritation to her than a benefit, and she uses her enjoyment as a weapon against the youthful folly of her own past. She is smart, likely smarter than Will, and she is neither overconfident nor self-hating in her life choices. There is an authentic matter-of-fact quality to Lydia that makes her an extremely compelling character.

Will, on the other hand, is not as complex as Lydia, despite his brooding war burden. It may be that he does not diverge as starkly from genre conventions as Lydia. For me, the most interesting aspect of his character is the fact that his good intentions often backfire on him in ways that make it difficult for him to trust his own instincts. This may be why he is willing to trust Lydia to teach him how to beat the odds at the gaming hells, and it works nicely, both as a means to build trust between them and as a means of creating internal and external conflict. For example, when he lashes out at Lydia’s protector, he sets in motion a series of events that could have grave results for him and others, including Lydia. Still, he can’t seem to help himself, which makes his gestures both admirable and problematic.

There are some novels for which I can articulate shortcomings like a grocery list – the reasons that the book did not work perfectly for me are very clear. A Gentleman Undone did not present itself that way; while I absolutely believe that it all comes down to pacing, it is more difficult for me to pinpoint the exact moments in the text where I felt things went awry. Some of my problems with the book stem from the contrast between the first half and the second, because the first part moves quite slowly, while the second half almost barrels forward in comparison, only to sort of dissipate once again at the end. I am going to try to articulate some of my issues without revealing any major spoilers.

While I admire the way Lydia and Will’s relationship begins somewhat unconventionally (and all of this acquaintance takes place on page), between Will’s backstory, the gambling set up (which necessitated long passages explaining the art of card counting and odds calculations), the context of Lydia and Edward’s relationship, which establishes him as boorish (speaking publicly about her skills and her inability to bear a child, for example), and catching up with Martha and Theo through Will’s awkward interactions with his family (his self-imposed isolation makes them awkward), the first part of the book was both crowded with content and frustratingly unfocused. It was not until Lydia and Will begin their gambling outings, at almost the halfway mark, that the plot moves into its groove and begins to draw all the disparate threads of its development together.

It was not the lack of romantic movement in the relationship that made the first half of the book feel to me like it was casting around for purchase as much as the way Lydia and Will’s separateness was mirrored in the novel’s fractured rendering of their backstories. The necessity of Lydia’s distrust of Will also required them to be often out of accord with each other, just as they were getting to know one another, which layered a jagged stop-and-go effect over the extended plot set-up, adding to the slow pacing effect.

Consequently, at the point where Lydia and Will begin gambling together, I had an almost visceral sense of things moving into place and resolving into a coherent narrative purpose. At this point the contemplation of the nature of personal agency, as opposed to fortune, luck, and happenstance, becomes a cogent force in the novel, helping to build the momentum and organize the novel’s thematic priorities.

The issue of knowing and being able to do one’s own will permeates the novel, interwoven with issues of trust: Will cannot fully trust himself, while Lydia cannot trust others, especially men. Will has more liberty than Lydia, even though his exercise of that freedom often creates, rather than solves, problems. Lydia, on the other hand, has less freedom but more determination and self-awareness than Will, and so much of what happens between them in the course of the novel is related to the building of trust through the exercise of individual will. At one point, when the two finally land in bed, Will thinks he can make Lydia value the experience in a way that belies her own experience and self-understanding:

“I’ve told you what I enjoy. You may believe I know my own tastes.” Her voice was growing thin with agitation. She twitched like a cornered animal. “Don’t dare fancy you’ll be the man to teach me the pleasures of tenderness.” Tenderness was a rat whose neck she wrung with her own hands before hurling it over the hedge to rot with feelings.

These are two people who need to be fully resolved within themselves, who cannot save each other but can provide for each other the opportunity for self-salvation. Because the novel so often presents these moments during sex, it makes sense that the novel would move more powerfully once Lydia and Will are sexually engaged:

     “You went to bed with me in the guise of an honorable man but you never were.”
He shook his head, jaw clenched tight. He’d betrayed her. He’d betrayed himself. He could make no earthly defense.
“You threw away your soul when you stopped that man’s blood and you can never, never have it back again.”
“I know.” One more pound of flesh torn away. He’d never wanted to own that truth aloud. He caught his breath on another spasm of sensation, in spite of the despair, and shook his head side to side. Stop. I can’t bear any more of this. Those were the words he ought to say but he’d forgot how to form them. He opened his eyes.
And he knew there’d have been no point in asking for mercy. It was a word with no meaning to the creature whose gaze met his.
She stared down at him, his judge and his ravisher, appalling as the eagle who’d feasted every day on Prometheus’s liver, and he as powerless as that Titan, chained to the rock, rent open, his darkest, most unspeakable secrets laid bare to her view.
Her eyes hardened. Her lips pressed tight. She leaned an inch nearer. “I love you,” she breathed, just loud enough for him to hear.
He gasped, one great rush of sustaining air. And he seized her with unyielding hands, and rolled her beneath him and drove himself into her, into her truth and her terrible strength and the pitiless love that was his only redemption in this world.
And came, claiming her, giving himself up to her, a woman so beautifully broken she could love a soulless man.

The emotional pay-off of a moment like this, expressed in such powerful prose, demonstrates the talented storytelling at work in A Gentleman Undone. Simultaneously, it raises the bar higher than the novel as a whole could reach for me. It is not that I wish the second half were weaker, nor that I wish Lydia and Will were more directly romantic in the first part of the book. It’s just that I wish the narrative felt as compelling and focused in the first half as it did in the second. Because these characters – especially Lydia – are complex and difficult, they require incredibly careful handling. I admire so much the way the novel strives to follow through on its commitment to personal will by not resorting to predictable deus ex machina interventions and coincidences, but I also felt frustrated at the points where the narrative tension dropped prematurely, especially because this happened most obviously at the beginning and the end of the book.

I will not reveal the ending of the novel, but I will say that conceptually speaking, it formed a logical nexus for all of the issues of trust, self-identification, and personal autonomy that were developed in the course of the story. So I’m not completely certain why, in execution, it fell somewhat flat for me. At one level I was thrilled it did not depend on some cheesy plot twist or overused trope. However, after so much emotional build-up, and so much complexity in setting out the conflicts and obstacles that we needed to believe could keep Will and Lydia apart, the final resolution felt too facile and quick. It could be my own genre conditioning, at least in part. But I also think that because the second half of the novel moved so quickly relative to the first half, that when everything just sort of ended, it felt more like dropping into a ditch rather than coming to an easy, smooth stop.

All of which leaves me torn. I adored Lydia and appreciated every unexpected turn the novel took with her story. The prose was often beautifully evocative, and when everything in the book was working together, I was deeply engaged and invested in the world Grant created. But when things felt out of sync, I was frustrated and even bored at times, left wanting more for these characters and their story. Still, I look forward to Grant’s next book, which is its own sort of recommendation for A Gentleman Undone. B-

~ Janet


isn't sure if she's an average Romance reader, or even an average reader, but a reader she is, enjoying everything from literary fiction to philosophy to history to poetry. Historical Romance was her first love within the genre, but she's fickle and easily seduced by the promise of a good read. She approaches every book with the same hope: that she will be filled from the inside out with something awesome that she didnʼt know, didnʼt think about, or didnʼt feel until that moment. And she's always looking for the next mind-blowing read, so feel free to share any suggestions!


  1. leslie
    Jun 04, 2012 @ 19:08:28

    You’ve misspelled her name. Cecilia Grant.

  2. Robin/Janet
    Jun 04, 2012 @ 20:31:23

    @leslie: Thank you so much for pointing that out!

  3. Sebastian Clouth
    Jun 04, 2012 @ 22:20:49


    I am the Books editor at Before It’s News ( Our site is a rapidly growing people-powered news platform currently serving over 3 million visits a month. We like to call ourselves the “YouTube of news.”

    We would love to republish your blog’s RSS Feed in our new Books section. Every post would have a description of your site and a link back to it. Our visitors would love to read your content and find out more about you!

    You could also publish excerpts of your books if you’d like :), along with links back to pages where they are for sale.

    It’s a great opportunity to spread the word about your work and reach new readers. We don’t censor or edit work.

    We will be featuring and promoting content and book excerpts across the web.

    Looking forward to hearing from you!


    Sebastian Clouth
    Books Editor, Before It’s News
    [email protected]

  4. cecilia
    Jun 04, 2012 @ 23:15:23

    I feel like there might be a “You’ve misspelled your name. It’s Sebastian Unclouth” joke in there.

    But just to comment on the review and the book, I agree with your rating. This was a book I think I admired more than I enjoyed.

  5. Meri
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 00:14:54

    I enjoyed A Gentleman Undone more than A Lady Awakened (try as I might, I just couldn’t warm up to Martha), but mainly on the strength of its second half. I agree that pacing was an issue and I skimmed a lot of the technical card playing explanations; I don’t think they were necessary to understand what was going on or why Lydia was so smart.

    I do love Grant’s prose and appreciate her unique characters; she has a distinct voice and I look forward to seeing what she comes up with next.

  6. Rosario
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 06:20:07

    @Robin/Janet: You might want to correct the links as well. The amazon one, at least, still points to “Cecelia”, so no results come up.

  7. Kaetrin
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 06:52:33

    I loved A Lady Awakened and I’m looking forward to reading this one. I hear Lydia explains the game show paradox and that has always confused me! I think Ms. Grant is pretty brave with the premise of this story. I suspect I will have similar thoughts to you Robin but I want to read it anyway. :)

  8. Janet
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 10:12:12

    @Rosario: Thanks, Rosario! I hope it worked; please let me know if it’s still wonky.

  9. Maili
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 10:45:08

    I haven’t read this one yet (no plan to read it for at least a year as I’m still remembering AnimeJune’s unexpected stream of spoiler-ish tweets about this book), but based on your review alone, it sounds like Grant’s another Julia Ross.

    @cecilia: Thanks for giving me the biggest laugh of the day.

  10. Janine
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 13:07:44

    I’m 85% or so through this book. I have to say, this review is torturing me, because I want so badly to read it, but also to avoid spoilers until I’ve finished! I’ll be back to comment further when I’m done.

  11. Janet
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 14:05:19

    @cecilia: I must profess my ignorance here – can you explain the reference (and thus the joke?)

    @Maili: I don’t think I’ve read Ross — is the comparison a recommendation?

    @Kaetrin: I enjoyed the level of detail in regard to the gaming explanations, but I have to agree with @Meri that they might have been a little more extensive than necessary. I hate saying that, but since I had issues with the first half, in general, it might just be a function of what I noted as pacing issues, not the depth or length of the discussions.

  12. Janet W
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 14:18:50

    Meri, I’m with you — I liked A Gentleman Undone more than Grant’s first book too. I didn’t even really like Martha that much in this book … altho *fanning myself* her husband is certainly as appealing as ever.

    As always, Janet’s reviews are the gold standard. Thank you!

  13. cecilia
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 17:06:31

    @Janet: It was just a little pun on the guy’s name and “uncouth,” to suggest it was rude to post what looked basically like advertising to me, inspired also by the first comment in the thread.

  14. Maili
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 17:34:59

    @Janet: Hm, I don’t know. Julia Ross (you probably know her better as Julia Ross Ewing as I think it was you who found one of her books dull?) tends to make readers say: “She writes well, her stories are usually sublime, her heroes/heroines are quite unconventional, there’s a lot to admire, but I don’t know…. There’s something slightly off.” That’s the impression I’m getting about Grant from your and others’ reviews so far on this one and her debut.

    I do think Julia Ross is somewhat underrated (and horribly neglected), but I felt her books are, perhaps, not quite suitable for Romance genre? The kind that seems to want more than what she’s prepared to offer, anyway (I don’t think this is the case with Grant, though). I can’t even recommend Ross’s books that easily, because her books are so unique that one has to read it to know whether it works or not. Some readers found it dull, some found it too clever for its own good; some found it amazing and wonderful, and the rest had mixed feelings. In a way, even though her books are usually marketed as historical romance novels, I think it’s a hybrid of historical fiction and romance genre but not quite. Like Stanley Kubrick’s film Barry Lyndon, perhaps? I do still suggest some of her books for romance readers who want to read more Georgian-era romances, but that’s about it.

    Sorry, that’s a long way round of explaining why I don’t know whether comparing Grant with Ross is a recommendation or not.

  15. Janine
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 17:53:14

    What a thought provoking review, Robin! Though I’m so glad I waited to read it until after I finished the book. I would have hated to read that pivotal confession scene snippet here before I’d read it in the book.

    I still have a lot of pondering to do about this novel. I didn’t mind the leisurely pacing of the first half, partly because it contained the introduction to Lydia, and she fascinated me so much in that section, and partly because the second half of A Lady Awakened also felt slow to me, so my expectations were adjusted for that — does this make sense?

    In any case, I did read the first half more slowly, but I savored it, picking up the book and putting it down after half an hour, not for lack of engagement, but rather because it was so rich and thought provoking that I didn’t want to go too fast. I wasn’t bored at almost any point (the exception was at most one page of card game rules).

    The second half was more eventful and read faster, but in some ways I liked it a little less, because there the characters became more conventional.

    I loved Lydia so much when she was first introduced — her unsentimental cold ruthlessness, her reveling in the pleasures of sex, her inscrutable gaze, her focus on the cards, added up to this sharp and powerful person. I wanted more of that in the second half, and didn’t get as much as I was greedy for, but I still so appreciate her character.

    As she recovered her heart, to use the novel’s language, Lydia lost some of the edges that made her so fascinating to me. Her backstory, when it was revealed, wasn’t as original as the rest of her, and didn’t completely suit the person she’d become. She was like a phenoix risen from the ashes, and that made it hard to believe she’d ever wallowed in guilt to such a degree that she’d wanted to destroy herself in the way she had in the past.

    There were also some times, when she opened up to Will about her past, when I felt that it wasn’t entirely in her character to do so. I think it might have worked better for me to have him be the one to open up about what tortured him first, although maybe I’m wrong about that. He generally seemed like the one more willing to make himself vulnerable, of the two of them.

    As for Will, I agree he wasn’t as complex or interesting as Lydia, but I still appreciated that honor-gone-awry aspect of his character. There was something almost quixotic about him, and in that way, he reminded me a little of Ruck from Kinsale’s For My Lady’s Heart. It is always interesting to come across a couple in romance in which the heroine is the more cynical one. I can only think of a few books that fit that description.

    I do so love Grant’s voice, and that may be why I loved the ending, though I agree it felt a bit rushed. I just adored the writing in (to stay way from spoilers) that scene with Roanoke near the end. It worked for me better than the ending of A Lady Awakened although on the whole I think ALA is the stronger novel.

    One of the things that was so present in ALA but not in this book was a strong sense of place. Although perhaps that’s harder to evoke in a novel set in Regency London, which after all has been the setting of so many historical romances, than in one set in the countryside around the same period.

    Even with the caveats I have, I can’t grade this any lower than a B+. For one thing, whether or not it’s fair, any novel with an infertile heroine and no miracle pregnancy wins automatic bonus points from me.

    For another, there was so much to appreciate in this book — for me, practically on every page. Grant is a master prose stylist and her characters are both real and fresh. I love the way her heroines, in particular, don’t strive to ingratiate themselves with readers right off the bat. Instead you have to peel back layers.

    Part of me would have loved to see Lydia paired with someone just as complex and ruthless as she. That would have been an amazing book, but this was still a very good one.

  16. Maili
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 17:56:05

    @Janine: Heh. I now definitely support the Grant/Ross comparison.

  17. Janine
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 18:01:44

    @Maili: Can I ask why? I’ve only read two Rosses, Love’s Reward and Illusion, both written as Jean Ross Ewing, but I don’t see much similarity there (though I did like the latter of the two books — even though the heroine was a virgin harem-escapee!).

  18. Dallas
    Jun 05, 2012 @ 22:06:54

    While I’d probably rate it a “B,” I felt like I slogged through quite a bit of it, and I attribute that to having to wrestle with prose that too often veered into flowery/over-the-top/melodramatic territory. In fact, there was a bit of that in one of the passages you cited:

    “He gasped, one great rush of sustaining air. And he seized her with unyielding hands, and rolled her beneath him and drove himself into her, into her truth and her terrible strength and the pitiless love that was his only redemption in this world.
    And came, claiming her, giving himself up to her, a woman so beautifully broken she could love a soulless man.

    Similarly, there was this: “Crisis was within sight, then within reach, then it was upon her, blinding her to the picture she made with him, shutting out whatever thing he was murmuring, robbing her of every sense and setting her ablaze like a pagan pyre.”

    The abundance of many such overwrought phrases (and/or long sentences), made this narrative hard to read sometimes. (Not to mention that the accompanying rolling of my eyes tends to give me a headache.) Too bad, because I think that when Grant is at her best in both AGU and ALA, the writing is sublime.

    I have to say I liked the characters better in ALA than in AGU. I just think they were more likable. I got a little tired of Will’s martyrish self-loathing. I also felt that he loved Lydia in part because he saw her as being as corrupted or degraded as he. It’s as though he–feeling consigned to hell for his sinful deeds–only felt comfortable with a woman whose own soul was stained. Or something like that. I don’t know; it just didn’t sit well with me.

  19. Review: A Gentleman Undone by Cecilia Grant | Smexy Books
    Jun 06, 2012 @ 11:01:13

    […] Reviews: Dear Author – B- Gossamer Obsessions – A+ The Passionate Reader – B+ […]

  20. A Book Unreviewed: On Cecilia Grant’s A Gentleman Undone | Something More
    Jun 12, 2012 @ 10:02:03

    […] are tons of proper reviews around, including two at Dear Author and a (spoilery, I thought) A+ from AnimeJune. Kelly at Insta-Love has a great […]

  21. Cecilia Grant ROCKS my romance world! « bookworm2bookworm's Blog
    Jun 16, 2012 @ 00:10:49

    […] out. BUT, don’t take just my word for it! Check out some of the buzz around the blogosphere … Dear Author; Kay’s Blog; Rakehell; Happy Ever After/USA Today are just a few out there that are raving about […]

  22. Review: A Lady Awakened by Cecilia Grant
    Nov 25, 2012 @ 16:24:59

    […] ever since the second in her Blackshear Family series released in May, and especially since I read Robin Reader’s review of A Gentleman Undone over at Dear […]

%d bloggers like this: