Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

CLASSIC REVIEW: A Soldier’s Heart by Kathleen Korbel

Cleo is an artist, designer and avid reader. She’s been reading romance for more than thirty years. She reads almost every type of romance, except those with vampires, serial killers or jerky heroes.

kathleen korbel a soldier's heart

Dear Ms. Korbel,

When I read Jane’s call for reviews of classic romances, I knew that I wanted to review your book, A Soldier’s Heart. I read it in the mid 90s and it stayed with me. I finally tracked it down and re-read it last year and was impressed with how well it held up. It’s the first romance with protagonists with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) that I ever read. Twenty years, and many PTSD romances later, I still think it’s one of the best I’ve read.

The book opens with a prologue – an unnamed army nurse saves the life of an unnamed marine sergeant in an evac hospital during the Vietnam War. The story begins some twenty years later, with the marine, Tony Riordan, working up the courage to go introduce himself to Claire Maguire Henderson, the nurse who saved his life. Seeking out Claire is part of Tony’s healing – he’s spent years laying to rest his ghosts from Vietnam. He unintentionally sets off a crisis for Claire, who hasn’t dealt with her past trauma yet. Tony realizes that his appearance brought up repressed emotions that Claire’s not quite ready to deal with, so he comes up with a way for him to stay in town and help if possible. Claire’s renovating an old inn, and he just happens to run a construction company, and offers to do some of the renovations at cost. I liked Tony so much that I was willing to accept the convenient coincidence. He’s upfront with Claire, and everyone who wonders what he’s doing, that he’s there primarily to help her heal. He’s also honest with himself that he’s attracted to Claire.

Most of the story takes place over a period of several weeks, while Tony works on the inn. There’s not a lot of external conflict – most of the story is about Claire facing her past while falling for Tony. I loved reading about two adults cautiously, and then not so cautiously, start a new relationship. Tony and Claire are both forty-something single parents, with careers, support networks and responsibilities, and they act like grown ups. There’s a sub-plot involving Claire’s older child, 17-year-old Johnny, who’s learning to fly and wants to enlist in the Air Force. The story’s set during the UN intervention in Somalia in 1993 or 1994, and the build up of US troops in Somalia triggers both Johnny’s desire to join the military and Claire’s PTSD symptoms. While the main story arc is Claire moving from denial to asking for help with her PTSD, it’s not a dark story. It’s emotional, but there’s also humor and sweetness.

I really like the portrayal of PTSD, which is almost a separate character. I have PTSD (from childhood trauma, not military service). I can only speak for myself, but this book rang emotionally true. The focus of the story is on Claire. We see her dealing with nightmares, flashbacks, and rages. We see her telling herself that she has no right to be upset, and that she’ll be fine as long as she keeps busy. We get hints of Tony’s past struggles too, but he’s further along in his healing, and it’s not really his story. I suppose I could be annoyed by the fact that the story is set up so that the man knows more than the woman, at least about dealing with PTSD. But Tony’s character is written in such a way that he doesn’t feel like an overbearing romance hero, who knows what the heroine needs better than she does. He doesn’t come across as thinking that he has all the answers, either for her or for himself. I love that he seeks out help for Claire almost immediately, but waits until she asks before telling her about the resources he’s found for her. As he says, “I’m like the library Claire. Information’s all there for the asking. But I’d never walk into your house and demand that you read.” (p 181) I’ve played variations of both Tony’s and Claire’s roles in my life, as the giver and receiver of help recovering from trauma, and they both resonated with me.

Treatment for PTSD has changed in the past twenty years, so before I re-read A Soldier’s Heart, I wondered if it might seem dated. Because the story focuses on Claire’s feelings, and on her journey from denial to asking for help, rather than on her actual treatment, I didn’t find it outdated. Some of the discussions about women and PTSD, however, did strike me as old-fashioned. Tony’s surprise that women who served in Vietnam also had PTSD made me roll my eyes. For example, here’s a passage from Tony’s first conversation with his vet center counselor about Claire and his concerns about how to help.

He’d somehow always thought of the victims as men. The men had suffered and the women had soothed. The women had appeared like a gift in Nam, bright-eyed and brash and smelling like Dove soap. A reward for having survived the time back in the boonies, a reminder that somewhere in the world there was still grace and compassion.

He hadn’t considered, all these years, that the women had brought home their own nightmares home.

Well, he thought it now.

Tony sighed, wished he were a lot smarter. A lot.

“We’re stupid, aren’t we?” he finally countered….“I really screwed it up, man. Tell me what to do.”

“Same thing you do with any of the guys you’ve run across. Just be there until I can get you extra help.” (pp. 48-9)

The thing that made it work for me is Tony’s self-deprecating sense of humor and the fact that he’s helped other, male, vets before. This isn’t just about saving the poor little woman. I also really liked that once Claire admits she needs help and finds someone at her local vet center to work with, Tony consciously backs off and lets her heal without becoming a crutch for her.

A few things bothered me as I was re-reading it for this review that I don’t remember noticing the first two times I read it. I thought the beginning was slow and the initial set up requires a suspension of disbelief – if I didn’t know that Tony was a romance hero, I’d worry that he was acting like a creepy stalker. Some of the supporting characters seemed one dimensional or cartoonish, particularly Peaches, Claire’s overprotective, ex-con pastry chef. And the writing style isn’t to my taste. It reminds me of Nora Roberts, particularly 1990s era Nora Roberts. I’m not sure how to characterize it except that I find it a bit choppy and distancing. Here’s an excerpt.

Claire turned her attention to her surprise houseguest. He was a dangerously good-looking man, filling out that apron and T-shirt with disconcerting effect. Well-honed muscles and long, lean lines. The glint of a well-worn chain and medal around his neck, worn for purpose rather than decoration, betraying his lack of pretension. The kind of man any sane woman would want in her kitchen cooking her pasta. (pp. 58-9)

But while I noticed some problems, I didn’t really care about them, because I LOVE THIS BOOK. I was completely emotionally invested in the characters and swept away by the story. I love the two main characters. I love their honesty, vulnerability, and subtle humor. I love how Tony helps Claire face her past and begin to heal so they can have a future together. Hell, I even love Tony’s mustache. I completely believe that they’ll live happily ever after. I’m not a crier and A Soldier’s Heart had me crying in public.

I’ve read quite a few romances with characters with PTSD in the past 20 years, some good and some really bad. In my opinion, they can go bad in two ways – either by taking the PTSD much too seriously or not seriously enough. Either the past trauma completely defines and overwhelms the heroine’s or (more often) the hero’s identity to the exclusion of everything else, or it’s magically cured by true love and/or hot sex. A Soldier’s Heart avoids both pitfalls. Re-reading it reminded me why I keep reading PTSD romances, despite the duds that I’ve encountered, because when they’re done well, the emotional payoff is incredibly rewarding. This is a lovely book. Thank you for writing it. My grade is an A-.

Sincerely,

Cleo

AmazonBNBook Depository

Do you have an old favorite you’d like to share with us? Send your classic romance review to [email protected]

Guest Reviewer

16 Comments

  1. Sunita
    May 25, 2014 @ 11:46:16

    Cleo, what a fantastic review. I love this book so much. It balances between the hero and the heroine really well, and the HEA is hard-earned and believable. Tony is such a sympathetic character without being too good to be true, and the way he gives Claire space is something a lot of heroes could learn from.
    Thanks so much for this.

    ReplyReply

  2. Beret Brenckman
    May 25, 2014 @ 11:47:39

    Thank you for this review. I remember this book fondly. I too read it in the 1990′s when I was reading a lot of category romances. In fact, this book is in a box in my Dad’s attic waiting for me to claim and read it again. I remember liking the fact that the heroine was center stage and that Tony helped her but didn’t take her over. I also remember really believing in PTSD and how the author handled it. Thanks again for bring up this really great book!

    ReplyReply

  3. Janine
    May 25, 2014 @ 12:44:20

    Great review, Cleo! I know so many people who love this book.

    I found some notes I took when I read A Soldier’s Heart back in 2005 and although I thought it was better than average, the trauma overwhelmed the romance — Claire seemed so caught up in her trauma that the book never convinced me that she could enjoy a romantic relationship with Tony.

    I also felt that Tony was too supportive — I never saw him get angry or hurt by Claire, or lead his own life, he was just there for Claire 100% of the time. It seemed like he was more Claire’s therapist than her lover, and that dynamic bothered me — I felt Claire would be better off with an actual therapist who had no romantic interest in her.

    My favorite part of the novel was the prologue that took place in Vietnam. I remember crying my way through that part of the book. At the time I read this book I had just finished reading Sebastien Japrisot’s A Very Long Engagement, a powerful book about the aftermath of war, and that may have affected the way I viewed A Soldier’s Heart.

    ReplyReply

  4. library addict
    May 25, 2014 @ 12:52:00

    Kathleen Korbel was an autobuy for me, but I don’t remember this one as clearly as some of my favorites (The Ice Cream Man, Edge of the World, Jake’s Way.

    The good news is Eileen has the rights back to many of her early Silhouettes and plans to release them digitally this year.

    ReplyReply

  5. cleo
    May 25, 2014 @ 14:31:13

    Thanks you guys – it was fun to review a book I feel so passionately about. And it’s great to discover that I’m not the only one who remembers it.

    @library addict: That’s great news.

    ReplyReply

  6. Annette
    May 25, 2014 @ 14:31:26

    After reading this review and the comments, I really want to read this book. But the mustache…gah…don’t like. Perhaps if the author doesn’t mention it very much, and I do something with the cover…

    ReplyReply

  7. cleo
    May 25, 2014 @ 14:53:35

    @Annette: There’s some mention of the mustache in the story, but not a lot (iirc). I do remember Claire noticing it when she kisses him but I don’t remember a lot of description of his mustache (of course I’m not objective about this book at all – I just visualized him as Tom Selleck and went with it).

    ReplyReply

  8. Annette
    May 25, 2014 @ 15:16:11

    @cleo: Thanks! Yeah, Tom Selleck was my back up plan. :)

    ReplyReply

  9. cleo
    May 25, 2014 @ 17:43:12

    @Janine – I see where you’re coming from. I didn’t read their relationship as too therapeutic, but I can see why you read it that way. I know that I’m completely unobjective and even I can see that Tony didn’t have much of a character arc outside of helping Claire.

    It would have been nice to see more of them together post crisis, working as a couple on something that wasn’t Claire’s recovery.

    ReplyReply

  10. Susan
    May 25, 2014 @ 19:45:43

    @cleo: He looks more like Stacy Keach in the cover thumbnail. :-) Great review, Cleo.

    ReplyReply

  11. Jayne
    May 26, 2014 @ 07:39:21

    I loved this book when I read it about 10 years ago. I need to reread and see if it holds up for me.

    ReplyReply

  12. nasanta
    May 26, 2014 @ 09:03:27

    Haven’t read this before. Great review. I’ll put it on my virtual mountain and wait for the digital to come out.

    Edit: I think there’s an issue with the math CAPTCHA. It doesn’t like algebra. x + 8 = 14. I put 6 and it told me I was wrong.

    ReplyReply

  13. cleo
    May 26, 2014 @ 10:54:58

    @nasanta – I hope it comes out in digital soon.

    And I’ve had a couple issues with the math anti spam thing too, when it rejected my correct answer.

    ReplyReply

  14. Erin Burns
    May 27, 2014 @ 12:36:09

    Thanks for the review. I don’t think I have read this one before, and since it is available on OpenLibrary, I am checking it out.

    ReplyReply

  15. Eileen Dreyer
    Jun 05, 2014 @ 02:36:10

    Cleo and everybody-
    Kathleen Korbel is my evil twin, who used to write all those Silhouettes. I can’t thank you enough for the really thoughtful review of Soldier’s Heart. It is my most personal book, as it started out with my own brother’s journey to close his books on Nam and was completed the weekend the Women’s Memorial was dedicated in Washington. I was actually going to write my brother’s story. He was the one who said to me to write the women’s story, because no one had really done it.

    I know it seems ridiculous that nobody considered that the
    women also suffered PTSD, but they really didn’t. It was why my brother insisted I write this story. The women never stayed in support groups, because none of the men understood their perspectives. The VA had no idea what to do with them. So, like Claire, they just tried to slog through. Remember. PTSD wasn’t even considered a legitimate psychological issue until 1976, and it wasn’t even the soldiers who made the medical world figure it out. It was 26 children who were kidnapped in Chowchilla and buried in a bus. So even though we always knew there was trauma from war, nobody had figured out how to define it or treat it. My brother was one of the first streetside counselors after the war, and they just flew by the seat of their pants.

    I’m very grateful that you guys remember the book after all this time. I’m delighted it provoked discussion. As for the reissue, yes. It will be coming out within the year. I’m putting up all my RITA winners, including Soldier’s Heart, Ice Cream Man and A Rose for Maggie. So it will be out there again, probably next spring.

    Oh, and as for the mustache? Yeah, I know. The problem is, if I was going to write as realistic a book as I could in romance, the hero had to have facial hair. I never knew a Nam vet in those days who did not have facial hair. It was how you could first identify them in the years when they wouldn’t identify themselves.

    ReplyReply

  16. cleo
    Jun 05, 2014 @ 08:27:55

    @Eileen Dreyer – thanks for your comment! It made my day.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: