Aug 27 2011
REVIEW: Loving Scarlett, Scarlett Rose and the Seven Longhorns Book1 by Lola Newmar
Dear Ms. Newmar:
I had almost forgotten I had read this book until the bull semen news story jogged my memory. I think I was purposely trying to repress it. I understand that this series published by Siren and books like it featuring multiple “heroes” are very popular and are earning you all tons of money. It is one of the more befuddling things in life much like the origins of the universe theories. Maybe unknowable.
Loving Scarlett is the first in a series of 9 stories, all approximately 20K words and sold for $5+ each. The premise of the series is that these bull shifters have one mate that they search for all their lives, some families of shifters never finding their mate. The seven Lenox brothers find their mate in Scarlett. Why there are 9 stories and not 7 is another of those unknowable mysteries. It is important when reading this book, or indeed, even this review, that readers not get caught up in trivial things like consistency or rationality of thought.
The story begins with Scarlett Rose on the side of a cliff. She wakes up with no memory, her clothing torn and her body bruised. She begins to slowly regain her memory by simple things, such as talking:
“Well, that’s nuttier than a fruitcake,” she voiced aloud.
She gasped and covered her mouth in realization she had spoken in a deep Texan drawl. Texas! I’m Texan!
Sweet Mary Joseph. The Lord works in mysterious ways.
From the cliff she can see a vast ranch and a man on a horse herding four huge longhorn. Three of them red and one white. She can even see, from her position on the cliff, that the man on the horse is shirtless and that he has “chiseled muscles and … massive, broad chest and shoulders.”
The man on the horse is Denzel and he is herding four of his brothers because, well, I’m not sure why shapeshifting bulls need another shapeshifting bull in human form to herd them. The scene is told from Devlin’s point of view and he’s not happy about training for his upcoming stint in the rodeo tour. Early on in the book I asked myself all kinds of questions like why is Devlin training. Why is his brother riding a horse around instead of shifting into a bull himself? Why am I even debating with myself the whys and wherefores of BULL SHIFTERS??
It is explained that the longer the bulls remain in bull form, the stronger that they get and the sharper their minds are. You call this “supply and demand” but that’s not really what supply and demand means. Supply and demand is an economic model for pricing. But even taking pricing out of the equation, the supply and demand model searches for an equilibrium at which supply and demand are equal and thus – oh for god’s sake, just take it as a given that your use of supply and demand in this context is incorrect and I’ll move on:
Their shape-shifting strength was a matter of supply and demand. The more they remained in their bull forms, the stronger their strength and the sharper their minds when they allowed their inner beasts to be unleashed.
Devlin, in bull form, is distracted by a “glimmer” in the wooded cliffs and somehow is able to not only see Scarlett picking her way down the cliff, but also that the glimmer came from her “silver necklace.”FN1 Worse, his “inner beast” rockets to the surface at the long bright red streak on her arm.FN2 As he is racing toward Scarlett, he is brought up abruptly once he catches her scent. It is the scent of their mate.
Scarlett and the bulls exist in a state of near constant arousal when near one another. Or are thinking of each other, even from the very beginning (although the beginning is a misnomer as this entire story takes place in one day). Her pussy is constantly clenching or creaming and usually from just getting her hand touched.
Concern crossed his features, creasing his prominent forehead as he pressed his fingers softly against the pulse on the side of her neck. It was obvious the move was only meant to check if she was doing okay, but she felt the channel of her pussy begin to subtly contract from that single innocent touch.
….
Levi reached across the table and grabbed her hand snuggly.
Scarlett was shocked at how she had to squeeze her thighs together for fear of staining the cushioned chair with the juices that had now begun to creep from her pussy.
But when Dr. Leo, the oldest, starts kissing her after she has been examined and showered, she protests when he puts a stop to it yet she is horrified by the idea of someone washing her underthings:
He grabbed her arms and gently tugged them down. “We can’t do this right now,” he whispered.
A stubborn, offended look came over her features, and she lifted her hands right back to the back of his neck. “Why, of course we can. It’s okay, Leo. I know I’m young and probably inexperienced, but I’m not afraid—
…
And, here, Rhett washed your bra and panties—”
“He what!”
Ruh-roh.
“Who the hell is this Rhett, and why in the hell is he handling my underwear?” Her eyes widened in horror, and her chest heaved with anger. But all Leo could pay attention to was the way her full tits moved up and down with each breath. They were such a delicious contrast to her tiny little waist.
The book has one crazy scene after the other. From Leo kissing her, to Scarlett nearly orgasming from getting her hand held, to Leo spanking her in front of his 6 brothers later that evening because she had the audacity to overhear their conversation about her when she was in the bedroom and they were in the kitchen. (Leo had to spank her in front of his brothers just hours after they all first meet because he needed the color red on his mate to make his shift easier. Of course, he couldn’t ask her to run and get the red bookmark that caused him to assault her with his lips earlier in the day.)
But time is a just a mundane, human concept. This is the world of fiction, of bull shifter fiction, so it all makes perfect sense that a virgin girl, never exposed to any paranormal creatures, would choose to lose her ALL of her virginity in an orgy with 7 brothers she had never met before on the very same day she awoke with amnesia on the side of a cliff, injured and alone. It makes as much sense as sentences like these:
She wasn’t an unattractive girl, much to her relief, but she scrunched her nose at the pale, ashy complexion she wore as if she hadn’t eaten in a long time.
and it’s as beautiful as sentences like these:
She could already feel small waves of her juices fall from her newly-broken pussy, making a damp spot under her ass.
In all, I guess it’s a mastery of consistency of the inconsistent. I will admit I was never bored. In 26,000 words, there is so much crazy that the digital format can barely contain it. Like Scarlett’s pussy, the crazy is bursting at the seams.
Let me end with this note. The Lenox have a cattle ranch. Not a diary operation but a cattle ranch. They are bull shifters running a business that ends up with their non shifting brethen being slaughtered for food and shoes, amongst other things. Perfect synchronicity. F
Best regards,
Jane
Cattle have shitty long range vision. Return to text.
Mythbusters busted this myth in 2007 but bringing up facts is probably akin to throwing red paint in front of a bull. No one is going to notice or react. Return to text.
Goodreads | Amazon | BN | nook | Sony | Kobo
Related posts:

















Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:12:57
And yet this is the line of the review I found crazy: 9 stories, all approximately 20K words and sold for $5+ each.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:15:24
@Shannon Stacey: That struck me too. For a couple dollars more you can purchase a full length novel.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:20:24
OMG, I remember Jane #romfailing this. Holy crap. I STILL have no words for this story.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:33:51
Wait, I’m confused: Scarlett appears to be the mate of all 7 brothers, so why the need for additional stories?
And I agree with Shannon – that price is outrageous!
Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:45:27
I think this was one of the first stories they were going to put out. I read the plot and the wtfery was overwhelming. I would not touch it for that price either. I cannot suspend disbelief enough for anything with bull shifters.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:50:17
In cattle, it’s usually one bull to a number of cows. Just saying. Also, cow-shifting women doesn’t have much allure.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 11:57:56
When I am empress of the world, nobody is ever going to be reminded by a bull semen story of a romance they read.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:12:12
Also, as somebody whose past employment includes working a dairy farm and having a hand in more than one calf-pulling, I suggest Scarlett opt for the C-section. Not sure epidurals are enough for chains and a come-along.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:14:43
@Shannon Stacey: And there goes the coffee….. :)
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:19:01
LOL. I think that really did set the tone for the rest of it.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:36:48
So much for gatekeepers.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:48:22
I, too, remember this from #romfail. But this was new: “Ruh-roh.” — like…what Scooby_Doo says?
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:57:07
@coribo25: I feel a horse and barn door metaphor coming on…
Aug 27, 2011 @ 12:57:27
This is the most excellent review I’ve read on your site. If nothing else, I’m grateful for a book with so much wtf’ery to produce such a fun review. I was laughing out loud reading this and my husband insisted on knowing what was so funny – I even read out some bits to him. Of course, now he’s even more convinced the romance genre is a big pile of poo. Sigh. I will never hear the end of this.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 13:45:30
Yay, Jane! Ummm, and I’m ashamed to say that I was so mesmerized by the horror of the first book that I bought the second in the series…(yeah, I’m a sucker). It was so bad that it almost transcended itself, ya know? You don’t even wanna know what they get up to on the second day . What kills me is that I have many friends who are talented, unpublished authors and yet this series is in print…
Aug 27, 2011 @ 13:50:46
@Miss_Thing: I guess there is a point at which something is so bad it becomes awesome? Of course I cannot buy the next Scarlett book because there are so many of these marvels of “so bad it is good” to read and review.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:02:40
Besides the total misrepresentation of elementary economics, I’m not sure I go with the idea that
Wouldn’t it be the opposite? In fact, I’m not generally a paranormal fangirl, but the ones I’ve liked are the ones where the opposite is true and the characters have to figure out where the balance lies between their superhuman qualities and that which allows them to remain human. And then there’s the
— girl, if you don’t know if you’re experienced or not, you’ve been hanging out with the wrong guys.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:03:54
Scarlett sounds like she’s in desperate need of a visit to the gynecologist.
And $45 for 180,000 words? Judging by the samples presented in this review, the 1st story is way overpriced and doesn’t bode well for the rest of the series.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:09:44
Jane, I think I <3 you.
I'd read more romance if more romance writers watched MythBusters.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:15:53
@Jane – oh, no need to get sucked into the “so bad it’s good” trap since I did it for you this time :-). I will say that after the medical fetish and the bukkake scenes my horrified giggling was so loud that I scared the cats. Not to mention the part where one of the heroes demonstrates his extremely long tongue by licking his own forehead. I do have to give the author props for going with longhorns – I don’t think I’ve read another paranormal with a bovine shifter.
Some of the Siren books are really interesting… I’m all for a good menage story but when you get to the point where you need a spreadsheet to keep track of everyone and their respective genitals, it’s a bit much for me.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:24:11
…one of the heroes demonstrates his extremely long tongue by licking his own forehead
I bet that takes the sting out of the baby’s first word being “Moo”.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:26:42
That is indeed the longest tongue that I’ve heard of in paranormals.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:31:15
@Jane: I was not aware that cattle were particularly renowned for having long tongues. I thought the ungulates with that honor were giraffes.
Okay, so now who’s writing the were-giraffe?
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:50:09
I feel like this review begs for links to photos from the Bull City.
Ladies and Gentleman, meet Major, our bronze statue:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhawkins/3423781065/
http://www.city-data.com/picfilesv/picv26650.php
and a nice portrait:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bullfls.jpg
Just in case you need more visualization. He’s anatomically correct and (I think) life size.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 14:55:24
Thank you for this so bad it’s a tiny bit awesome review. You know, it’s more fun to read the review than try to make it through a book like this – thanks for doing that for us.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 16:22:56
Sounds like a giggle-fit antidote for reading late at night after a rough day at work. Laugh your troubles away with Scarlett and her seven bully boys. One of them is named Rhett and, on the silliness scale, you could not want for more. Only problem being the LoveXtreme as in Xtremely expensive.
The review is providing enough laughs for now. I’ve been wasting away my Saturday afternoon contemplating changes for supply and demand. I started with centrifugal force. No, not quite right. Then I thought bottle rockets. Yep, that one works. With apologies to Sir Isaac, sing with me now, Under Pressure.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 17:38:46
@Jennifer: There is a similar statue in Chicago in front of the old Chicago Public Library, now the Chicago Cultural Center, I think. Except it’s a cow. Scarlett, maybe?
Aug 27, 2011 @ 18:36:17
@Jennifer So you will be ordering this series for your county?
Aug 27, 2011 @ 19:17:47
Jackie, Eve Langlais mentions a were-giraffe in Bunny and the Bear. There are were-crocs, were-bunnies that are giant genetic throwbacks. It goes on and on.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 20:05:20
This review was absolutely delicious… and depressing at the same time… delicious that the book was so awful and your review so wonderfully described it in it’s WTF-ness… and depressing in that how the hell does this stuff *ever* get published? And other than “I-gotta-read-how-bad-*this*-train-wreck-is” nature of the book curiousity, why would someone pay that outrageous amount for trash like that?
Aug 27, 2011 @ 21:07:44
Every time I saw bull-shifters, I heard bull-shitters. Very apropos, don’t you think?
Aug 27, 2011 @ 22:13:09
The reason publishers publish this stuff is because readers line up to read it – even when there’s a review saying it sucks. Because it’s like a car accident – everyone wants to read it to see how bad it is. So, sales are good, publisher says, hey, readers like this crap and there we go. More crap.
Jane, you are a goddess to read this and report just how bad it is so others, like me, won’t pick it up. And I certainly won’t – even to see how bad it is. I don’t want the publisher credited with the sales.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 22:28:30
@Susan/DC: I’m guessing she says “probably inexperienced” because she has amnesia and doesn’t actually know for sure. I can’t remember if it was mentioned in the review – did she ever recover her memory? I don’t know, but I think if I woke up hurt and unable to remember anything about myself, I would be more interested in figuring out what the heck happened to me than in having sex with seven complete strangers. Even taking the whole mating lust thing into account, I think it’d be smarter to say “Stay away from me, because 1) I need to think and 2) how do I know you guys aren’t the reason I’m hurt and have no memory?”
Aug 27, 2011 @ 22:29:53
@LG: Yes, she does. When all the men come on her at the same time, she has a vision of her past, specifically getting hit on the head and tumbling down the cliff.
Oh, and for one second she does think about being in a strange house with seven men, but given that her pussy is clenching and creaming, I guess she views them as safe.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 22:41:41
@Sue t: From what I understand from other authors I’ve talked to about this book, this is pretty apropos for this publisher. Apparently, they like this stuff. More power to them, but I’m not buying it. ;)
Aug 27, 2011 @ 22:54:23
I’m slightly alarmed because my October Superromance’s heroine is named, yep, Scarlet Rose. Ah, hell. And she’s from Texas. The only relief I have is there are NO bulls in my book. Yay.
The irony makes me laugh as much as the review.
Aug 27, 2011 @ 23:06:53
At the Ruh-roh my brain was saying “this has got to be fanfic written as a joke that someone published.” But no? It’s real?
My grandpa raised cattle in Texas and yow, so much other hooha my brain can’t handle with the thought of werebulls.
1) Cattle smell. Strongly. You can get used to it, but most folk would definitely notice. If that didn’t come up somewhere I’d have to giggle over it.
2) Brothers or not, bulls don’t share cows. They’re not a happy-family sharing kinda animal. They’re a “put this big thing in his own pen and keep out of his way when there’s a cow in there” kind of animal. Which makes me wonder if the werebulls have been mating with their ranch cattle and then…just selling the calves if any? Many cattle ranches will indeed sell off the calves for veal.
3) Bulls are herbivores – are these big ol’ strapping Texas guys eating meat or vegetarian? Vegetarians in Texas, unless they’re in one of the major cities, have an annoying time of it. Texas is very happy about its beef. Also not to mention werebull eating normal cow – cannibalism? I think?
4) From the rodeos I’ve been to I can’t imagine a werebull wanting to take part in one. The focus is not on making the experience fun for the livestock that take part in it. Unless it’s a bullriding thing and the werebull is needing to kick the crap out of a human for some plot related reason.
Oddly many people don’t realize that not only are bulls often dangerous, so are cows. If you wander into a field and a herd thinks you’re there to feed them (if you’re there for example at the wrong time and gate) they can indeed crowd around you and give you a good trampling on, because they’re excited about dinner and you might have it somewhere on your person. (It’s nothing personal.)
So my brain is totally broken now, but I’ve kinda enjoyed it – the review at least! Werebulls. Wow.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 00:15:00
@jeannie: Indeed. I keep pronouncing it bull-shitters too. :)
Aug 28, 2011 @ 08:18:12
Words fail me.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 09:30:44
Oh wow this looks pretty disastrous and hilarious…
Aug 28, 2011 @ 12:00:39
Is it just me or does the whole pussy clenching/creaming and being turned on by a simple touch sound more like the erotic writings of a frustrated man? Or maybe I just spent too much of my late teens looking up horrible erotica online.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 12:55:05
@Jade:
This is what I was thinking. It reads like it was actually written by a man- or at least for a male audience.
All I know is the description of having a wet spot on my butt does not, in ANY way, get me in the mood for sexy excitement. It has me wondering where the nearest restroom is and how long the line will be.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 13:07:30
@Jade: IMHO, this isn’t erotic romance at all. Maybe erotica, but more like just plain ol’ porn. Stories to jerk off to.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 13:58:54
The idea of having sex with bulls (or bull shifters or whatever) was so strange to me that I googled it. The first thing that came up was a site about cuckolding, which I learned today was when a man watches his wife get banged by others. On that site, the guy who is watching his wife have sex with others is calling the others “bulls.” So maybe the writer is trying to make that idea literal. If so, I think that lends credence to the possibility that this is a man writing as a woman.
I don’t know if that’s the genesis behind the idea, but I feel a little gross just thinking about it. Now I must go scrub my cache.
Cheerio.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 16:53:23
@Cara Ellison: I knew what cuckolding was, but I didn’t know there were terms associated with the participants. Thanks for taking one for the team and googling!
The More You Know(TM)
Also, the idea of Bull Shifters didn’t sound that strange to me. I’ve read paranormal books where there are wolf, bear, [insert predatory animal here] shfifters; rarely this includes shifters of what we normally consider prey animals. However, the execution as it is in this book leaves me feeling really baffled.
Still, I’m leaning toward this being written with a man’s gaze. Woman who gets turned out without the need for any foreplay (hand-holding and/or touching a pulse point is not foreplay), she’s wetter than Niagara Falls, and even as a virgin she’s a sex goddess in the bedroom. Yep, unreasonable fantasy woman usually seen from male writers.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 17:28:33
Thanks @Jade.
The virgin/whore dichotomy definitely points to a man having written it. Also Jane quoted this:
The first time I read “broken”, I thought it was a man. I know of no woman who would ever think of her pussy as “broken.” If you were just de-virginized, I suppose you might think of your hymen being “torn” or even (gross) your pussy being “used” or whatever. But broken? No way.
Aug 28, 2011 @ 17:29:30
@Jade: I didn’t think bull shifters were necessarily all that strange either, but usually if an author picks a particular animal for characters to shapeshift into, the characteristics of that animal are part of that shapeshifter “type.” That’s why it’s so odd that we have seven bulls and one woman, when it would have been more logical, considering the type of animal, for there to be one bull shifter and several women. Maybe the author thought multiple guys would be more appealing to female readers?
Aug 28, 2011 @ 18:21:22
There’s been a historical fascination with the whole “sex with a bull” thing in mythology:
Pasiphae (wikipedia)
“…She was also the mother of “starlike” Asterion, called by the Greeks the Minotaur, after a curse from Poseidon caused her to experience lust for and mate with a white bull sent by Poseidon. …In the Greek literalistic understanding of a Minoan myth, in order to actually copulate with the bull, she had the Athenian artificer Daedalus construct a portable wooden cow with a cowhide covering, within which she was able to satisfy her strong desire. The effect of the Greek interpretation was to reduce a more-than-human female, daughter of the Sun itself, to a stereotyped emblem of grotesque bestiality and the shocking excesses of female sensuality and deceit.”
So there we go, we can laugh at this and be part of an ancient trend of “a woman and a bull, really?!” Though the way I remember reading this myth, Poseidon was punishing Minos by causing his wife to lust after the bull. Which I remember thinking was a completely unfair way of punishing Minos, but this was in the day of it being the worst slam for the wife to have a child that wasn’t her husbands, and a freakish bull-child at that.
Not that the Minotaur is a werebull.
Aug 29, 2011 @ 09:32:40
Baha. Bahahahaha. Oh, I’m sorry, author. “Sorry” is definitely the right word.
Thank you for this, DA.
The ironic thing is, I don’t think this was written for a male audience exactly; it taps into a lot of the more risque female fantasies…in a fashion. But a LOT of “erotic” authors appear to be very disconnected from what they are writing, and this kind of thing is good evidence.
Anyone else secretly hoping for a sequel called something like Good Burger?
Aug 29, 2011 @ 20:56:21
I wonder when are the shifter storys going to stop.After this last longhorns crap whats left.It seems everyones trying to top each other in were junk. I have not seen a female cow yet sure it is coming.The man who loved 6 teats or 8 not sure how many cows have and do not want to know either.I think the longhorns are holding the top spot till something new comes that should not be turned into were shifter.I know everything were is a hot topic in books but this is becoming to much slap togather strange shifters you got a book.
Aug 29, 2011 @ 23:16:29
@Debra S:
My next book is about grasshopper shifters. I find grasshoppers very sexy. You know, they’re green, and they hop. Total alpha material.
(PS. Totally joking)
Dec 21, 2011 @ 20:20:24
I’m not sure what I laughed at more, the review or the comments. Wow. Just, wow.