Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

REVIEW: How to Engage an Earl by Kathryn Caskie

Dear Ms. Caskie

How to Engage an EarlI picked up your book with the vague impression that I had read you before and enjoyed you. Unfortunately that is not the impression that I was left with at the end of How to Engage an Earl. How to Engage an Earl had all the standard regency hooks: a lofty titled gentleman who is a rake, a connected story of sisters, an overlooked heroine, and a scandalous situation that leads to a faux betrothal. In a crowded book field, this story fails to stand out.

Anne Royle is the middle sister of three who might be the secret daughters of the Prince Regent. Despite being a “startling vision swathed completely in white”, she easily blends into the background to the extent that she is invisible. She is able to drift from couple to couple in a party, lifting glasses from peoples’ hands, just for the fun of it. Of course, she plays this game knowing that she is not supposed to draw attention to herself. Which makes complete sense to me. Of course, a beautiful woman with pale hair, snowy porcelain skin and described as “an angel incarnate” would easily be overlooked doing strange things in a ballroom filled with bored people looking for a scandal to whisper about.

And what of the hero? The Earl of MacLaren, Laird Allen, is similarly a mass of contradictions. The book opens with our dear hero taking his turn in the garden with his second woman of the night. He’s supposed to be reforming but the minute he got back into society, he couldn’t resist the midnight garden pleasures with eager society matrons showing us he is a) a rake and b) very manly.

Anne and Laird are caught in a compromising position in Laird’s bedchambers so they embark on a faux betrothal to save Anne’s reputation and to make Laird more appealing to his former fiance. Lady Henceforth (!) left Laird at the altar because she felt he was always on the verge of disgracing her. (Lady Henceforth is a smart girl). Laird is believes that by participating in the betrothal that he can convince Lady Henceforth of his reformation. Because every woman who is afraid of your past inconstancies will be won over by the fact you’ve thrown over your fiancee for her.

The majority of the plot surrounds finding proof that Anne is one of the secret triplets of the Prince Regent. Like most every aspect of this story, I found it to be a bit on the silly side. Anne is somewhat appealing and there are some fun moments such as Anne making up the story of how she and Laird met and then having to fill Laird in on the details later. It is possible that this story was supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek sort of romp ala Jasper Fforde with characters named Festidious (the butler) and Lotharian (an old roue), but I just kept rolling my eyes at every turn of the page. D

Best regards,


Release Date: June 26, 2007

Jane Litte is the founder of Dear Author, a lawyer, and a lover of pencil skirts. She self publishes NA and contemporaries (and publishes with Berkley and Montlake) and spends her downtime reading romances and writing about them. Her TBR pile is much larger than the one shown in the picture and not as pretty. You can reach Jane by email at jane @ dearauthor dot com


  1. Estelle
    Jun 23, 2007 @ 08:17:08

    Oh, boy I almost couldn’t believe it when I read this review. I’m used to books opening with the hero bedding his mistress/random woman of the day, but apparently this hero has 2 women in the same evening! What a special guy and what a great way for an author to introduce the hero of her book. And it just kept getting better and better. Compromised! Faux bethrothal! completely twisted subplot with hero’s former fiancée! Secret baby!

    Reading the review I thought at first it might be a spoof, because I have trouble believing even Avon would let a book with a synopsis like that loose on the shelves.

    Thanks for the advance warning Jane. I’ll definitely stay clear of this one.

  2. Robin
    Jun 23, 2007 @ 08:53:12

    Hmm. Sounds like it’s supposed to be descended from Wilde or Sheridan. I haven’t read this one, but that kind of superficially broad but ironically incisive humor is very difficult to pull off. What would have discouraged me, though, is the cover. That cover model looks wayyyyyyyy to contemporary to me, and she looks like she’s wearing a two sizes too large Sears housedress, not a lovely Regency gown of which the hero has just divested her. Although perhaps it’s better than those hideous clinches or the shirtless, headless, beefcake covers.

  3. Sarah
    Jun 23, 2007 @ 09:03:48

    I couldn’t agree more! I found the first in this series to be somewhat appealing, but this book was devoid of anything interesting for me at all. It was just boring. I couldn’t hate it or like it, it just left me feeling blah and that I wasted a few precious reading hours, never a good thing.

%d bloggers like this: