Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader's point of view

About Sunita

Sunita has been reading romances since she ran out of Cherry Ames, Student Nurse and Chalet School books and graduated to Mary Stewart and Georgette Heyer. Other old favorites include Mary Burchell, Betty Neels, Elsie Lee, and Edith Layton. Among current writers, she reads and rereads Anne Stuart, Tamara Allen, Sarah Morgan, Marion Lennox, Josh Lanyon, and Susanna Kearsley. She blogs as VacuousMinx and tweets as @sunita_p.

Posts by Sunita :

JOINT REVIEW:  Return on Investment by Aleksandr Voinov

JOINT REVIEW: Return on Investment by Aleksandr Voinov

Return on investment voinov

Martin David, an eager but inexperienced financial analyst, is the newest member of the investment team at Skeiron Capital Partners in London. His boss is an avowed financial genius, but he’s also overbearing and intense. Despite his erratic behaviour, Martin can’t help being drawn to him both professionally and personally.

Too bad his boss doesn’t seem to feel the same. In a firm where pedigree and connections mean far more than Martin’s newly-minted business degree, Martin feels desperately inadequate—at least until he meets the enigmatic investment manager Alec Berger, who promises to help Martin establish himself in the financial community. Martin is so charmed by Alec’s sophistication and wit that he gives him data that should have stayed confidential.

Then the financial crisis hits. Banks burn, companies teeter on the brink, and Skeiron’s survival is at stake. Martin is pushed into the middle of the fight for Skeiron—against both the tanking economy and a ruthless enemy who’s stepped out of the shadows to collect the spoils.

Return on Investment is the new gay financial thriller from EPIC Award winner and Lambda Award finalist Aleksandr Voinov.

Dear Aleksandr Voinov,

You kindly sent me a copy of your new, self-published novel and Sirius was also keen to read it, so we decided on a joint review. While the book is a Kindle Select release, it is free of geographical restrictions.

Sirius: I will confess that despite really enjoying your writing in the last couple of years I have read very few if any of your solo project due to the subject matter not being my cup of tea. This book sounded like something I could read, so of course I was interested in reviewing it. I do not know how I would characterize this book, but I do think that “gay financial thriller” is not a sufficient description for me. There is a very strong erotic element in it and I would argue that a romantic storyline is also present, although I definitely would not call this book a pure romance.

Sunita: I have the same subject matter issue with Voinov’s solo backlist, although the Dark Soul series remains one of my favorite m/m reads of the last few years. I totally agree with your take on this new novel. It is strongly erotic and there is an obvious romance storyline by the midway point of the book (although it’s not clear at all at the beginning). The erotic parts drive the story forward but they do not need to be as long and detailed as they are for that to take place. I’m not complaining about them, just pointing out that this kind of detail is usually present in erotica and romance, not in the thriller category (even when there is on-page sex). That said, it didn’t matter to me that I couldn’t categorize it easily, because I like books like that. I agree that someone looking for a traditional romance would find aspects of the story to violate some of the unspoken rules, but other parts of the book reminded me a lot of mainstream romance.

Sirius: For the first 30-40 percent of the story I was very irritated with the main character of this book. I could barely tolerate his stupidity in any character of any genre. In theory I had no problem with Martin being attracted to Alec. I mean to me he had all the charm of a snake from the very beginning, but I fully admit that I may have been influenced by the blurb. The blurb clearly states that Martin gives him confidential information, so this probably made me prejudiced againt him from the start. Quite honestly, I feel that the blurb gave out a very significant spoiler which should have stayed hidden, because it made me form expectations and I usually try very hard to enter the book without any preconceived expectations.

To go back to Martin and Alec, I guess I can see how Martin was charmed by Alec but only to a certain degree. I do not see how Martin could share confidential information so easily and without much (if any) hesitation. And he did it twice, although apparently he remembered that he had a brain eventually and did not give out a final piece of information which I guess was more confidential than what he gave to Alec the first two times. I get that people in real life do criminal things like “insider trading” because they want to make a lot of money and they do not care that it is illegal. But making a lot of money at least counts as some kind of reason to do illegal things, right? This was a young idiot doing stuff and I am not quite even sure why. I do not want to give out even more spoilers, but it felt strange. I did not feel that he was even in love with Alec – in lust maybe, not that it would have been enough for me, but at least it would have been some kind of explanation. Martin acted as if he did not understand all the seriousness of passing confidential numbers about his firm productivity to an outsider. Was he not given a drill about any information about a firm being confidential the first day he started work? I know I am sensitive about the issues of confidentiality, I am a lawyer, but I just could not buy that somebody in the world of finance is so dim. He just acted as if he had no or very little clue – without any thought. If he acted as a seasoned criminal I may even had less problems with this. I also think that in light of another thing Alec did Martin should have run away pronto.

I have probably spent enough time on this issue. I just want to say that there is *a lot* of page space devoted to sex between Martin and Alec and a lot devoted to their “relationship” – them together is the main reason why I would insist on the word “erotic” in the book description.

Sunita: I found Martin frustrating as well. At first I felt sorry for him, since he was clearly in over his head with Alec and apparently in thrall to him. But I didn’t understand at all why he was so willing to give Alec confidential information. He didn’t hate his job, he seemed to want to progress in his career, so why would he jeopardize his future like this? For secret trysts at the Ritz and some fancy suits? There’s a word for someone who unethically exchanges confidential data for fancy gifts, and that word is not “ingenue.” I would have had a much easier time seeing Martin as going through a coming-of-age experience if he hadn’t *started out* so ethically challenged. Maybe this is influenced by the movie Wall Street and Martin is Charlie Sheen, but we just didn’t get enough of a sense of why he behaved the way he did at the beginning for me to have much sympathy for him. Since Alec was pretty clearly a weasel and dangerous from the first chapter and Martin experienced those qualities first-hand, I wasn’t on board to see the latter as starting out dumb and then growing up.

About halfway through the book I started to think about what it would be like if Martin had been an unreliable narrator. That would have been fun and I would have found his character much more interesting, because I really had trouble liking him as a naif (which I felt I was supposed to do).

“It’s not personal, Martin. Maybe it is for you. Be smart.” Francis gave him a smile, then brushed past and raised a hand to shoulder level. “Good night”.

Sirius: Martin’s crush on one of his bosses, a financial genius who is one of the partners in his firm, was much easier to understand and much easier to sympathize with. Feelings of never being able to measure up to him, wanting to mean something in Francis’ eyes, while I would not consider this storyline a full blown romance, I felt that this provided romantic element to the book and I liked them together.

Sunita: Yes, the Francis-Martin storyline was much more conventional and made more sense. Francis was a bit too larger-than-life in his character traits for me to fully warm to him as an individual: he was so handsome, so smart, so obsessed with his job, even his quirks seemed predictably fabulous, if that makes sense. I thought it was interesting that in the end he turned out to be quite old-fashioned in his approach to finance. It was as if we were supposed to see old-time M&A as somehow more ethical than the current financial world, and I’m not sure I buy that. But it was an intriguing twist and not one I expected.

There was something about Francis that intimidated Martin, from the first, rushed meeting during his interview to now, and probably for the rest of his time at the firm. The best way to deal with it was to stick to the claustrophobic concerns at Skeiron, pounding out one report after another. He knew those portfolio ultimately now, knew their market shares, their profit margins, their current value. To him, they were just set of stats, not people. Maybe the management figured prominently in Francis’s mind; after all, he did catch up with his CEOs regularly – but the people on the bottom rungs were invisible.

Sirius: I thought that Martin grew up a lot by the end of the book. I was very happy that apparently he learned enough ruthlessness from the villain but also had some fundamental decency in him. I really liked that and when I finished I even was glad that I “met” him.

Sunita: I wanted Martin to pay for the stupid things he did, or pay in a different way. In the end he had a bright future, the romantic relationship he wanted, and loyal friends. Everyone around him sacrificed more than he did. That kind of annoyed me, mostly because I didn’t think he deserved his good fortune.

Sirius: I really liked the settings of this book and this is a testament to the writer’s talent that he made finance sound so fascinating. Although I think the fact that I am completely ignorant about the finance played its part too – usually the more ignorant I am about the setting, the more eager to learn I am. The finance part of the book is written with authority, and since I have no knowledge to question it, the story swept me away.

Sunita: I agree, the setting was terrific, and the small details about the office, about deal-making, and many of the secondary characters were among the best parts of the book. The pacing felt off; it took a long time for the crash to happen, especially considering that’s the tagline of the book, and the last third was overstuffed with events (some of them really eyebrow-raising, like the bit with the priest).

Sirius: I also want to mention that I really liked Martin’s trainer and friend Josh – I get that Martin needed a friend outside of the crazy world of finance, but Josh ended up being such a sweet normal character in the sea of crazy, more importantly he felt like his own person with agency, not just existing to support Martin if that makes sense. Grade: C+

Sunita: I liked him too, and I liked Martin’s friendship with Ian. That was a very good depiction of how competitors are also friends. I found many of the smaller scenes (between Martin and Ian, Josh, and some of the other business associates) were more effective than the big set pieces. The one consistent misstep was the way the Dubai investor (and other potential Arab investors) were portrayed; they came way too close to stereotypes for my comfort (and the blanket description of “Arabs” didn’t help). Also, the description of British Asians as “exotic” needs to die a fiery death. Immediately. So, overall, a mixed but interesting read for me. Grade: C+

AmazonBNKoboAREBook DepositoryGoogle

REVIEW:  The Preacher’s Promise by Piper Huguley

REVIEW: The Preacher’s Promise by Piper Huguley

Dear Piper Huguley:

I first learned about your new historical romances when several readers in my Twitter feed raved about your lovely covers. When you posted in DA’s author open thread I decided I wanted to read and review the full length novel. Jayne had independently decided to read and review the novella, so we thought reviews of both stories would be fun to do. I hadn’t read anything about the novella when I read the novel, so I think readers can pick up either installment without difficulty.

The Preachers PromiseI didn’t know that these books were in the Inspirational genre when I bought The Preacher’s Promise, but I didn’t think it would be a big deal for me unless they were heavily tilted toward proselytizing, and since they aren’t, it wasn’t. I hadn’t read an Inspie before this, so I’m sure there are things I missed (and there were a couple of phrases that were unfamiliar to me), but I didn’t notice anything that made me feel as if I wasn’t part of the potential target readership.

The story opens in 1866 with Amanda Stewart mourning the recent death of her father, a lawyer dedicated to the abolitionist cause. She has just graduated from Oberlin College, but she has no job and very little money, and when her father’s white partner makes her feel as if he has designs on her, she decides to take the teaching position in a small Georgia town that was recently offered to her father. When she arrives in Milford, the mayor and town blacksmith, Virgil Smithson, is surprised and dismayed to meet a young, attractive lady rather than the older gentleman he was expecting. Virgil is determined to put her back on the next day’s train north, but Mrs. Milford, whose family owns the large plantation which gave the town its name, basically orders Virgil to keep Amanda on as teacher and marry her for the sake of convenience and respectability. Although each finds the other physically attractive, southern, small-town Virgil and northern, college-educated Amanda don’t see themselves as a match at all, but Mrs. Milford’s word is still law to Virgil in many ways, and Amanda has nowhere to go if she leaves Milford.

The rest of the novel tells the story of Amanda’s adjustment to life as a wife and schoolteacher in the south, Virgil’s growing acceptance and respect for his “Mandy,” white resistance to a school for blacks, and the revelations of Virgil’s (and his daughter March’s) personal histories, which wind up being enmeshed with Amanda’s. This is both an opposites-attract romance and a cross-class romance, since Amanda is free and highly educated for a woman (especially a black woman), and Virgil, although a respected preacher and blacksmith who appears bound for politics, is a former slave with little formal education.

I enjoyed many things about this story. The setting, the plot, and the supporting cast are all imaginative and the choice to set the book directly after the end of the Civil War gives us a community that is still grappling with making the transition from slavery to freedom. Mrs. Milford still rules the roost, however benevolent she may be, and the less powerful whites in the neighboring town (we only see the men) are deeply suspicious and always threatening, implicitly or explicitly, to put blacks back in their former place. The laws of the time (such as those covering the manumission of slaves) are woven effectively into the storyline. Mrs. Milford, March, and Pauline (who looked after March in Virgil’s absence) are depicted with sympathy and skill, and the overall life of Milford remained with me after I finished the book.

Virgil and Amanda are interesting and sympathetic characters, but I felt that the execution didn’t quite live up to the promise where they were concerned, especially as their relationship developed. Part of this was because the gulf between them seemed so wide, and the author’s decision to use dialect for Virgil in both his thoughts and his words meant that the gulf between him and Amanda (whose speech was quite formal in its grammatical and vocabulary choices) was even wider. There is a very good scene in which we see Virgil preaching and believe the way the congregation responds so positively to him, but for much of the time Virgil seemed tongue-tied not only in his conversations but in his interior thoughts. It would have worked better for me if he had been hesitant in his speech but more fluent in his thoughts.

As a result, while I was rooting for Virgil and Mandy, I didn’t feel as if I really saw them fall in love on the page. I don’t think this was because the book is an inspirational and therefore the physical passion aspect is more muted. The author effectively conveys their mutual physical attraction and their growing respect and affection, but I never got that “oh, there they go, they’re in love” feeling. That could entirely be me rather than the book, though.

The writing was serviceable, but at times it became rough and a bit clunky. Perhaps because Amanda and Virgil didn’t have an easy time communicating, a lot of the story unfolded in exposition or interior monologues, and these often interrupted the rhythm of the story. Sometimes points were repeated, which slowed down the pace even more. The first half of the book contains a lot of setup, while the second half has much more action as the several plot points are resolved. There are some glitches in the copyediting; I noted a couple of homophone errors and a supporting character’s name changed spelling partway through the book. Overall, while the cover was indeed lovely, the rest of the production values (including the formatting) could have been better. It wasn’t enough to stop me because I really wanted to see how everything turned out, but if you’re not committed to the story, I can imagine it being enough to cause some readers to put the book aside.

This is definitely an inspirational romance. Both characters invoke God regularly and Virgil is a real preacher, as opposed to a Regency vicar, for example. The characters read the Bible to each other and they talk about their relationship in terms of serving God. I didn’t find this emphasis to detract from the romance (although I did wonder why Virgil felt it would be wrong to consummate the marriage, since they were lawfully wedded, lots of people married for reasons other than romantic love, and they were planning to stay married). I felt as if the emphasis on not just religion but spirituality fit the community and the characters, but readers who want to keep their religion and their romance separate are probably going to have some trouble with this.

Despite the flaws, I’m glad I picked up this book. It wasn’t the smoothest read, but the historical setting and the characters made up for that. I look forward to seeing what happens next with these characters and the Milford community. Grade: B-/C+

~ Sunita

AmazonBNKoboAREBook DepositoryGoogle