<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Midday Links: More on the DOJ suit, Cover Testing, Fake reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/2009/09/21/monday-midday-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/</link>
	<description>Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader&#039;s point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 08:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-370390</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-370390</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-370335&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jill Sorenson&lt;/a&gt;: I never had the reaction to that phrase that you did, but I think that&#039;s because I took it as &#039;ultimate&#039; power vs &#039;all&#039; the power in my head. But I can absolutely see the problems with that phrase.

I&#039;d also love to see a &quot;thoughtful, positive, in depth defense of female submission that explores the power dynamic&quot; too. In fact I want to see it so badly, and it&#039;s such an interesting subject to me, that I might have to write it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-370335" rel="nofollow">Jill Sorenson</a>: I never had the reaction to that phrase that you did, but I think that&#8217;s because I took it as &#8216;ultimate&#8217; power vs &#8216;all&#8217; the power in my head. But I can absolutely see the problems with that phrase.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also love to see a &#8220;thoughtful, positive, in depth defense of female submission that explores the power dynamic&#8221; too. In fact I want to see it so badly, and it&#8217;s such an interesting subject to me, that I might have to write it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Sorenson</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-370335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Sorenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-370335</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369924&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cara&lt;/a&gt;:I have a harder time understanding the Dom role, especially the appeal in causing pain, but I&#039;ll put that aside for now. I get what you&#039;re saying about oral. But what if the sub is bound and the Dom controls the depth of penetration? Sorry, that is a graphic image. I&#039;m not seeing how the sub has any power there, and even the ability to use a safeword is hampered. A lot of trust must be placed with the Dom not to go too far. Trust is power, no?

I would also argue that the ability to cause and withhold pleasure is power. In the above scenario, the sub is giving the Dom pleasure, but he&#039;s still in control.

@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-370289&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Angela&lt;/a&gt;: Ultimate power? Yes, that makes more sense to me.

I just feel like this &quot;sub has all the power&quot; expression is trotted out to ease the concerns of anyone who finds D/s problematic. It has never clicked with me. I&#039;d like to see a thoughtful, *positive*, in depth defense of female submission that explores the power dynamic instead of dismisses it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369924" rel="nofollow">Cara</a>:I have a harder time understanding the Dom role, especially the appeal in causing pain, but I&#8217;ll put that aside for now. I get what you&#8217;re saying about oral. But what if the sub is bound and the Dom controls the depth of penetration? Sorry, that is a graphic image. I&#8217;m not seeing how the sub has any power there, and even the ability to use a safeword is hampered. A lot of trust must be placed with the Dom not to go too far. Trust is power, no?</p>
<p>I would also argue that the ability to cause and withhold pleasure is power. In the above scenario, the sub is giving the Dom pleasure, but he&#8217;s still in control.</p>
<p>@<a href="#comment-370289" rel="nofollow">Angela</a>: Ultimate power? Yes, that makes more sense to me.</p>
<p>I just feel like this &#8220;sub has all the power&#8221; expression is trotted out to ease the concerns of anyone who finds D/s problematic. It has never clicked with me. I&#8217;d like to see a thoughtful, *positive*, in depth defense of female submission that explores the power dynamic instead of dismisses it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-370289</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-370289</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369912&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jill Sorenson&lt;/a&gt;: I think saying the sub has &quot;all&quot; the power is a bit misleading. I do think the sub has the ultimate power - in that it can be stopped. But that&#039;s not all power by any means, and the sub is making one choice to not make any other choices, submitting themselves to someone else&#039;s control. 

But the sub is also making that decision, and the ability to call a stop to everything is pretty damn powerful in a Dom/sub relationship. I think that the &#039;sub has all the power&#039; comes from that dichotomy. They aren&#039;t in control of the details through their submission, but they are in control of the overall picture with that one simple word.

I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;m making sense. You&#039;ve made me think about this a lot last night and this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369912" rel="nofollow">Jill Sorenson</a>: I think saying the sub has &#8220;all&#8221; the power is a bit misleading. I do think the sub has the ultimate power &#8211; in that it can be stopped. But that&#8217;s not all power by any means, and the sub is making one choice to not make any other choices, submitting themselves to someone else&#8217;s control. </p>
<p>But the sub is also making that decision, and the ability to call a stop to everything is pretty damn powerful in a Dom/sub relationship. I think that the &#8216;sub has all the power&#8217; comes from that dichotomy. They aren&#8217;t in control of the details through their submission, but they are in control of the overall picture with that one simple word.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m making sense. You&#8217;ve made me think about this a lot last night and this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaetrin</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-370149</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaetrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-370149</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369912&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jill Sorenson&lt;/a&gt;:  I&#039;d like that post too Jill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369912" rel="nofollow">Jill Sorenson</a>:  I&#8217;d like that post too Jill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Lyn</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369961</guid>
		<description>My cat likes to lay on her back with her legs splayed wide apart. We call it her &quot;whore pose&quot;. Turns out it&#039;s very Odalisque-y. Thanks for tacking on the laugh there at the end, Jane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cat likes to lay on her back with her legs splayed wide apart. We call it her &#8220;whore pose&#8221;. Turns out it&#8217;s very Odalisque-y. Thanks for tacking on the laugh there at the end, Jane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369924</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369924</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369912&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jill Sorenson&lt;/a&gt;: 

Maybe think of it in terms of both parties. After all, the Dom is receiving their pleasure from the sub&#039;s apparent powerlessness. It is hard to explain. The way I think of it is that it&#039;s kind of like giving fellatio. It can seem like the giver is in a &#039;weaker&#039; position, but really, giving head is a super-powerful thing? 

The sub&#039;s pleasure is what drives the Dom, even if that pleasure appears to be out of their control. It&#039;s what gives the Dom their job, and without it, there&#039;s nothing. Idunno, it&#039;s hard to explain, that&#039;s for sure, and I&#039;m no expert. I just think about it and fantasize a lot ;)

We definitely need some more experienced BDSM voices to chime in, here, however!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369912" rel="nofollow">Jill Sorenson</a>: </p>
<p>Maybe think of it in terms of both parties. After all, the Dom is receiving their pleasure from the sub&#8217;s apparent powerlessness. It is hard to explain. The way I think of it is that it&#8217;s kind of like giving fellatio. It can seem like the giver is in a &#8216;weaker&#8217; position, but really, giving head is a super-powerful thing? </p>
<p>The sub&#8217;s pleasure is what drives the Dom, even if that pleasure appears to be out of their control. It&#8217;s what gives the Dom their job, and without it, there&#8217;s nothing. Idunno, it&#8217;s hard to explain, that&#8217;s for sure, and I&#8217;m no expert. I just think about it and fantasize a lot ;)</p>
<p>We definitely need some more experienced BDSM voices to chime in, here, however!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Sorenson</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369912</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Sorenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369912</guid>
		<description>I hate the new Bro-Magnet covers. The original is FINE.

I&#039;m annoyed every time I read the phrase &quot;the sub has all the power.&quot; I can&#039;t stand it! I wish someone would explain this to me with a longer post. IMO the D/s relationship features a negotiation of power, and the turn-on for a submissive is in ceding control. How can you have it both ways? Sure, she/he can say no or use a safeword, but the entire point of a submission fantasy revolves around a certain level of powerlessness and letting go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the new Bro-Magnet covers. The original is FINE.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m annoyed every time I read the phrase &#8220;the sub has all the power.&#8221; I can&#8217;t stand it! I wish someone would explain this to me with a longer post. IMO the D/s relationship features a negotiation of power, and the turn-on for a submissive is in ceding control. How can you have it both ways? Sure, she/he can say no or use a safeword, but the entire point of a submission fantasy revolves around a certain level of powerlessness and letting go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Hilton</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369707</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369707</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369634&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sunita&lt;/a&gt;: Katie who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369634" rel="nofollow">Sunita</a>: Katie who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369701</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369701</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369700&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CK&lt;/a&gt;: It is. Definitely. I can&#039;t take anyone seriously without the right prefatory address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369700" rel="nofollow">CK</a>: It is. Definitely. I can&#8217;t take anyone seriously without the right prefatory address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369700</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369700</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-369685&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eggs&lt;/a&gt;:  I thought the formal way of addressing Jane when you disagree with her was ... Jane, you ignorant slut!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-369685" rel="nofollow">eggs</a>:  I thought the formal way of addressing Jane when you disagree with her was &#8230; Jane, you ignorant slut!  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eggs</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369685</link>
		<dc:creator>eggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369685</guid>
		<description>srpaulsen said: &quot;It might behoove you to restrain the snarky language (“self-published author wanks on about how her purchased review…”), particularly when you’ve got your facts wrong. It just sounds petty, and it will lose you readers.&quot;

Yeah, Jane. This blog SUCKS!! Heh heh heh. Heh heh heh.  

Sorry. I can&#039;t help but think of Beavis &amp; Butt-head, hunched over their computer preemptively powning all the &quot;snarky&quot; review blogs before their self-published romance comes out on Amazon. &quot;We&#039;ll never get a bad review now! Heh heh heh. Heh heh heh.&quot; Sorry. Stopping now ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>srpaulsen said: &#8220;It might behoove you to restrain the snarky language (“self-published author wanks on about how her purchased review…”), particularly when you’ve got your facts wrong. It just sounds petty, and it will lose you readers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, Jane. This blog SUCKS!! Heh heh heh. Heh heh heh.  </p>
<p>Sorry. I can&#8217;t help but think of Beavis &amp; Butt-head, hunched over their computer preemptively powning all the &#8220;snarky&#8221; review blogs before their self-published romance comes out on Amazon. &#8220;We&#8217;ll never get a bad review now! Heh heh heh. Heh heh heh.&#8221; Sorry. Stopping now &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wahoo Suze</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369654</link>
		<dc:creator>Wahoo Suze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369654</guid>
		<description>I heard that chocolate cockroach thing about 15 years ago, and it didn&#039;t turn me off chocolate in any way.  What did was 1. losing my taste for cheap sweetness (if I&#039;m going to ingest that many empty calories, I want them to be HIGHLY pleasurable, so now I only eat Callibeaut or Black &amp; Green chocolate) and 2. finding out about all the child/slave labour involved in the chocolate growing industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that chocolate cockroach thing about 15 years ago, and it didn&#8217;t turn me off chocolate in any way.  What did was 1. losing my taste for cheap sweetness (if I&#8217;m going to ingest that many empty calories, I want them to be HIGHLY pleasurable, so now I only eat Callibeaut or Black &amp; Green chocolate) and 2. finding out about all the child/slave labour involved in the chocolate growing industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SBMary</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369642</link>
		<dc:creator>SBMary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369642</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369438&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kim&lt;/a&gt;: Kim-That&#039;s weird because they show up as Nook books on my computer unless I am reading it wrong

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/jennifer-ashley?store=ebook&amp;keyword=jennifer+ashley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369438" rel="nofollow">Kim</a>: Kim-That&#8217;s weird because they show up as Nook books on my computer unless I am reading it wrong</p>
<p><a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/jennifer-ashley?store=ebook&#038;keyword=jennifer+ashley" rel="nofollow">http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/jennifer-ashley?store=ebook&#038;keyword=jennifer+ashley</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunita</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369634</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369634</guid>
		<description>I honestly do not understand why anyone pays attention to anything Katie Roiphe says. At her best she&#039;s mediocre, at her worst she&#039;s appallingly bad. And yet, she eats up valuable verbal real estate on a regular basis. I understand that places like Slate find her useful for shit-stirring, but why on earth does it work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly do not understand why anyone pays attention to anything Katie Roiphe says. At her best she&#8217;s mediocre, at her worst she&#8217;s appallingly bad. And yet, she eats up valuable verbal real estate on a regular basis. I understand that places like Slate find her useful for shit-stirring, but why on earth does it work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369624</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369624</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369583&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lada&lt;/a&gt;:  I honestly don&#039;t know who exactly answers for Singh&#039;s cover art. But, y&#039;know, just in case Knight has anything to do with that, too... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369583" rel="nofollow">Lada</a>:  I honestly don&#8217;t know who exactly answers for Singh&#8217;s cover art. But, y&#8217;know, just in case Knight has anything to do with that, too&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loosheesh</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369620</link>
		<dc:creator>Loosheesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369620</guid>
		<description>Big &quot;eww&quot; on the chocolate thing! I was at the hair salon this morning and saw a huge cockroach so the image is fresh in my head ... once again, &quot;eww&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big &#8220;eww&#8221; on the chocolate thing! I was at the hair salon this morning and saw a huge cockroach so the image is fresh in my head &#8230; once again, &#8220;eww&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryK</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369591</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369591</guid>
		<description>*I take comfort in the fact that though I&#039;m allergic to cockroaches (and dust) I&#039;m not allergic to chocolate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*I take comfort in the fact that though I&#8217;m allergic to cockroaches (and dust) I&#8217;m not allergic to chocolate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryK</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369590</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369590</guid>
		<description>Oh, how suspiciously sneaky. And reeky. LOL

YUCK(!) on the chocolate thing.

Self-publishing is increasingly well-received by readers?  Do tell!

@&lt;a href=&quot;http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369429&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Darlynne&lt;/a&gt;: A lot of people seem to think that artificially leveling the playing field &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, how suspiciously sneaky. And reeky. LOL</p>
<p>YUCK(!) on the chocolate thing.</p>
<p>Self-publishing is increasingly well-received by readers?  Do tell!</p>
<p>@<a href="http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369429" rel="nofollow">Darlynne</a>: A lot of people seem to think that artificially leveling the playing field <i>is</i> competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lada</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369583</link>
		<dc:creator>Lada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369583</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369572&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cara&lt;/a&gt;: I totally second this! Except...wouldn&#039;t Berkley ultimately be responsible for Singh&#039;s cover art?  I&#039;m guessing The Bro Magnet is published directly through Knight &amp; give them credit for at least trying to repackage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-369572" rel="nofollow">Cara</a>: I totally second this! Except&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t Berkley ultimately be responsible for Singh&#8217;s cover art?  I&#8217;m guessing The Bro Magnet is published directly through Knight &amp; give them credit for at least trying to repackage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Mc2</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/argolinkroundups/monday-midday-links/#comment-369581</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Mc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/?post_type=argolinkroundups&#038;p=43826#comment-369581</guid>
		<description>Katie Roiphe&#039;s piece is widely and correctly described as &quot;link bait.&quot; There are a lot of good responses from feminists popping up--though of course Roiphe, being in Newsweek, will get more views. Their main point seems to be that a) a popular book and episode of a new TV show are hardly evidence of an &quot;increase&quot; in such fantasies; and b) even if submissive fantasies are increasing, that likely isn&#039;t a backlash against feminism but a sign that as women gain more equality in the workplace and in relationships, they are more comfortable experimenting sexually and expressing their desires. I tend to agree. (Plus, people I know who read and *liked* 50 Shades see it as much more about negotiating a relationship, sexual and otherwise, than about submission. I&#039;d file this one under more dumb commentary by someone who hasn&#039;t read the book).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie Roiphe&#8217;s piece is widely and correctly described as &#8220;link bait.&#8221; There are a lot of good responses from feminists popping up&#8211;though of course Roiphe, being in Newsweek, will get more views. Their main point seems to be that a) a popular book and episode of a new TV show are hardly evidence of an &#8220;increase&#8221; in such fantasies; and b) even if submissive fantasies are increasing, that likely isn&#8217;t a backlash against feminism but a sign that as women gain more equality in the workplace and in relationships, they are more comfortable experimenting sexually and expressing their desires. I tend to agree. (Plus, people I know who read and *liked* 50 Shades see it as much more about negotiating a relationship, sexual and otherwise, than about submission. I&#8217;d file this one under more dumb commentary by someone who hasn&#8217;t read the book).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

