1) The new user agreement basically has ebay taking over the dispute process and ordering the buyer to “destroy” anything they feel is an imitation or counterfit good. And then, they will charge the seller the cost. This is going to get really interesting considering a) they do not have the legal right to do this and b) ebay is already a haven for scammers on both sides of the buying/selling fence.

2) Ebay has tanked big time. Most of the smaller, casual sellers have left. Some like me, who had it as a quasi-business have left, and sell through listings of ratios are in the toilet

3) Ebay doesn’t care. From listings that practice fee avoidance, to store sellers who violate ebay’s Terms of Srevice with outside links, to buyers scamming sellers … as long as ebay gets their listing fees, they do not care.

Good sellers know, get delivery confirmation of everything that’s sold and better yet, use a secret “seller’s mark” and photograph serial numbers, because there’s a good chance that someone is going to file a SNAD with paypal to get thier money back, and they don’t even have to send back the goods.

I used to love ebay, but it’s business practices drove it into the ground, and rulings like this don’t help. The “Seller Central” board at Ebay is a real eye-opener.

I can’t use EBay. I feel so bad if I get a good deal on a purchase that I will often Paypal the seller the difference between my winning bid and what I would have paid for it if the item was in an antique store. That sort of defeats the purpose.

The downside for eBay is that if it doesn't rigorously police its offerings, people might begin to lose confidence in the products sold.

This is precisely why Amazon Marketplace is kicking eBay’s @$$.