<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SFWA Comes Under Fire Again for Its &#8220;Talks Like a Duck&#8221; New Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/2007/11/30/sfwa-comes-under-fire-again-for-its-talks-like-a-duck-new-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/sfwa-comes-under-fire-again-for-its-talks-like-a-duck-new-committee/</link>
	<description>Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader&#039;s point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/sfwa-comes-under-fire-again-for-its-talks-like-a-duck-new-committee/#comment-104261</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/30/sfwa-comes-under-fire-again-for-its-talks-like-a-duck-new-committee/#comment-104261</guid>
		<description>Prior to his going off the rails on the subject of e-piracy, I had a lot of respect for Andrew Burt.  He is the founder of Critters, the sci-fi critique group, and he was part of the gang who pulled off the &quot;Atlanta Nights&quot; hoax that exposed PublishAmerica as the bottom feeder vanity press it is.  (see Wikipedia&#039;s entry on &quot;Atlanta Nights&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta_Nights&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for a description of the hoax).

However, on the subject of e-piracy, IMHO, Burt is not even rational.  This is the second time (that I&#039;m aware of) that he&#039;s headed up a group trying to stop what they perceive as e-piracy.  I wrote about the first time in my blog of 9/5/07 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mayareynoldswriter.blogspot.com/2007/09/look-back.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  

The thing that surprised me was Burt&#039;s contacting me after I blogged about him back on 11/11/05.  

So, Jane, don&#039;t be surprised if you hear from him after your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to his going off the rails on the subject of e-piracy, I had a lot of respect for Andrew Burt.  He is the founder of Critters, the sci-fi critique group, and he was part of the gang who pulled off the &#8220;Atlanta Nights&#8221; hoax that exposed PublishAmerica as the bottom feeder vanity press it is.  (see Wikipedia&#8217;s entry on &#8220;Atlanta Nights&#8221; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta_Nights" rel="nofollow">here</a> for a description of the hoax).</p>
<p>However, on the subject of e-piracy, IMHO, Burt is not even rational.  This is the second time (that I&#8217;m aware of) that he&#8217;s headed up a group trying to stop what they perceive as e-piracy.  I wrote about the first time in my blog of 9/5/07 <a href="http://www.mayareynoldswriter.blogspot.com/2007/09/look-back.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  </p>
<p>The thing that surprised me was Burt&#8217;s contacting me after I blogged about him back on 11/11/05.  </p>
<p>So, Jane, don&#8217;t be surprised if you hear from him after your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz Augustin</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/sfwa-comes-under-fire-again-for-its-talks-like-a-duck-new-committee/#comment-103716</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaz Augustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/11/30/sfwa-comes-under-fire-again-for-its-talks-like-a-duck-new-committee/#comment-103716</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s actually worse than that. If you read the Board&#039;s recommendations &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfwa.org/news/2007/copyrightcommittee.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; on SFWA&#039;s site, you&#039;ll see that it wasn&#039;t just the head but the entire committee that was reinstated:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Moved, (1) that per the recommendations of the Exploratory Committee, the former Electronic Piracy Committee be revived in toto under the new name &quot;Copyright Committee&quot; &lt;strong&gt;with the same members and chair&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;(my emphasis)&lt;/em&gt; as when it was disbanded;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Can SFWA do &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually worse than that. If you read the Board&#8217;s recommendations <a href="http://www.sfwa.org/news/2007/copyrightcommittee.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a> on SFWA&#8217;s site, you&#8217;ll see that it wasn&#8217;t just the head but the entire committee that was reinstated:</p>
<blockquote><p>Moved, (1) that per the recommendations of the Exploratory Committee, the former Electronic Piracy Committee be revived in toto under the new name &#8220;Copyright Committee&#8221; <strong>with the same members and chair</strong> <em>(my emphasis)</em> as when it was disbanded;</p></blockquote>
<p>Can SFWA do <em>anything</em> right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

