<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USA Today Besteller List, Week Ending August 5, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearauthor.com/2007/08/09/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/</link>
	<description>Romance, Historical, Contemporary, Paranormal, Young Adult, Book reviews, industry news, and commentary from a reader&#039;s point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Vivanco</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55356</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Vivanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/09/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55356</guid>
		<description>Oh I see. I hadn&#039;t worked out that it was the paranormal aspect that was innovative.

I&#039;m not sure that paranormal world-building is more difficult. It requires an initial effort, I&#039;m sure, but once it&#039;s set up, all the authors would be working from, one hopes, fairly detailed guidelines. I imagine that one of the problems that may arise when creating a connected series of contemporaries is that people may make assumptions about the contemporary world precisely because it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; contemporary, and that may mean that they trip up over details which differ from one location/culture/social group to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I see. I hadn&#8217;t worked out that it was the paranormal aspect that was innovative.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that paranormal world-building is more difficult. It requires an initial effort, I&#8217;m sure, but once it&#8217;s set up, all the authors would be working from, one hopes, fairly detailed guidelines. I imagine that one of the problems that may arise when creating a connected series of contemporaries is that people may make assumptions about the contemporary world precisely because it <i>is</i> contemporary, and that may mean that they trip up over details which differ from one location/culture/social group to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/09/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55347</guid>
		<description>The Dorchester books are connected paranormals which I view to be more difficult to craft than modern contemporaries with connected families.  I think the first similar series that Harlequin did was Raintree series which I thought was a mess.  As I am not a writer, perhaps the effort is the same but I view detailed world building harder to accomplish than creating a realistic contemporary setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dorchester books are connected paranormals which I view to be more difficult to craft than modern contemporaries with connected families.  I think the first similar series that Harlequin did was Raintree series which I thought was a mess.  As I am not a writer, perhaps the effort is the same but I view detailed world building harder to accomplish than creating a realistic contemporary setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Vivanco</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55288</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Vivanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/09/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55288</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Dorchester was innovative in creating these connected books by different authors and I would love to see other houses do something like this.&lt;/em&gt;

Harlequin Mills &amp; Boon have been publishing connected books by different authors for a while. What&#039;s different about this Dorchester set of connected books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Dorchester was innovative in creating these connected books by different authors and I would love to see other houses do something like this.</em></p>
<p>Harlequin Mills &amp; Boon have been publishing connected books by different authors for a while. What&#8217;s different about this Dorchester set of connected books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55200</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/09/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55200</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wouldn&#039;t it be fun to read a connected series with Meljean Brook, Nalini Singh and Marjorie Liu from Berkley?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What an awesome series &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; would be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wouldn&#39;t it be fun to read a connected series with Meljean Brook, Nalini Singh and Marjorie Liu from Berkley?</p></blockquote>
<p>What an awesome series <i>that</i> would be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherry thomas</title>
		<link>http://dearauthor.com/features/industry-news/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55138</link>
		<dc:creator>sherry thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2007/08/09/usa-today-besteller-list-week-ending-august-5-2007/#comment-55138</guid>
		<description>According to last years PW article featureing 10 fresh voices in romance (authors debuting in 2007), Monica McCarty&#039;s print run is 250,000.  Even if one gives it a 20% discount, since publishers tend to puff up the print run number when speaking to PW, that is still 200,000 books.  I expected to see her on the list.

I found the link to the article on Meljean Brook&#039;s website, if anyone&#039;s interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to last years PW article featureing 10 fresh voices in romance (authors debuting in 2007), Monica McCarty&#8217;s print run is 250,000.  Even if one gives it a 20% discount, since publishers tend to puff up the print run number when speaking to PW, that is still 200,000 books.  I expected to see her on the list.</p>
<p>I found the link to the article on Meljean Brook&#8217;s website, if anyone&#8217;s interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

