Comments on: Simon & Schuster Agrees that You Can Leave Them without Getting a Restraining Order

By: jack3_al

jack3_al — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:12:22 +0000

ïîðíî ðàññêàçû èíöåñò èñòîðèè ñåêñ ïîðíî ôîòî äåâóøêè áîëüøàÿ ãðóäü ýðîòèêà äåâóøåê ñåêñ êîíåì âèäåî posting ýðîòè÷åñêèå ôîòî çíàìåíèòîñòåé

By: Joe

Joe — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:57:56 +0000

By: Diesel

Diesel — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:34:37 +0000

By: Arnie

Arnie — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:08:10 +0000

By: Bill

Bill — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:12:00 +0000

By: Emily

Emily — Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:55:13 +0000

Indeed, they accidentally said exactly what they meant… you don’t ‘whoopise’ a legal contract.

By: Karen Scott

Karen Scott — Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:58:44 +0000

I read this yesterday, and wasn’t surprised at the turnaround. With the Author’s Guild’s firm opposition to the ridiculous contractual terms, I think they would have found it difficult to get their big named authors to sign up to the marriage from hell.

Good news for authors.

Isn’t if funny that whenever a big company comes up with a sucky idea, that meets with staunch opposition, they call it ‘miscommunication’, why can’t they just admit that they f*cked up, and be done with it?